Debunking Creationism #1 - How Human Evolution Works

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Yes

Then you should know that 'kind' and 'species' are synonymous and have the same definition.

Actually, 'kind' is used by a lot of YEC to help them explain way the impossibility of the Ark story by using 'kind' as equivalent to 'genus'.

Boru

[Jehanne]

Creationism is garbage 

I would say that it is completely rational, but based upon nonempirical, nontestable assumptions.

[Anomalocaris]

Yes

Then you should know that 'kind' and 'species' are synonymous and have the same definition.

Sorry, boy, the concept of “definition” hasn’t been created yet when the maker uppers of your god were busing making up all the bullshit, including the so call genesis, about your god.   You see, “definition” is a component invented for and needed by intellectual vigor.     Nothing associated with either your bullshit religion or the bullshitters who made all the crap such as genesis that is your religion, have ever had any use whatsoever for intellectual rigor because Intellectual rigor reveals for all to see the bullshit of your religion for what it is, and the bullshitters who made up your religion for what they are.     That’s why they would never bother with it, or parts of it such as concept of definition, as they invented your beloved bullshit.

[Huggy Bear]

[Anomalocaris]

[Angrboda]

[Jehanne]

One way to achieve speciation is to prevent sex; how does such square with the Biblical commandment to go forth and be "fruitful & multiply"?

[The Architect Of Fate]

The videos I link literally address how the biblical concept of kinds can't be used to mean the same thing as the modern idea of species. It makes no sense in terms of taxonomy and it only gets worst as you go up the taxonomic tree.

[Huggy Bear]

[The Architect Of Fate]

Actually it is an own in fact every response so far is an own because you don't know what the heck your talking about