Banning circumsicion

[Gawdzilla Sama]

You had only one "lower" but two "slightly lower" as "benefits". And ONE "low risk".

"There's a lot more benefits than risks to circumcision" which you didn't post. Ie. Bullshit.

Even then there's barely any reason that you would be against the idea of circumcision, at most you can call it genital mutilation

No, I call it useless. But I find it interesting that "genital mutilation" of SOMEBODY ELSE'S PENIS isn't very serious for you.

I was lucky. My older brother was circumcised. I wasn't. I'm sure Mom didn't know what was involved. I know I'm intact, and I can guess why.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Even then there's barely any reason that you would be against the idea of circumcision, at most you can call it genital mutilation

Sure there is. The right to not have your body hacked up permanently without any say should be ensconced in law.

Here's a question: Should the parents of a newborn be legally able to give their baby a facial tattoo? Such a tattoo would have life-long ramifications. Should that be legal?

[Gawdzilla Sama]

Should one parent be allowed to kill a child because it has the WRONG hair color? I know how I'd vote.

[FrustratedFool]

Why not just wait until the person having their genitals surgically altered can express a preference? I mean, we do that with every other non-medically necessary surgical procedure.

[The Grand Nudger]

Because they'd say no, lol. This is exactly what circumcision in the us ran up against when they were trying to get it started in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Those damned sick masturbators wouldn't even try to help themselves.

Insanity, jerking it, epilepsy, paralysis, hernia, tb, cancer, vd....headaches. This is why we started docking dicks. It was supposed to cure all of this. The things we think it helps with have changed right alongside the things that make us anxious.