Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2024, 9:23 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ludicrous Labour
#41
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
[Image: Auy2j9d.jpeg]

Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Reply
#42
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
Labour MP Rosie Duffield criticises image of school children holding Pride flags

Pink News
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#43
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
(July 1, 2024 at 9:56 am)Pavlov Wrote:
(July 1, 2024 at 9:55 am)Angrboda Wrote: FTFY.  You're basically begging the question if you use male sex as a synonym for man, and similarly with female sex.  It's implicitly rejecting the concept of gender.

I do reject it explicitly. It's garbage. I hope that clarifies.

Gender is a word, like all words it defines what most people understand it to mean. in this context I am not sure exactly what you're saying, how does one reject common usage of a word? FWIW I remember people rejecting the word gay, when it's etymology changed ot refer to homosexuality, it seems odd to me, like refusing to accept the tide is coming in. 

gender
noun
1. the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.
Reply
#44
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
(July 18, 2024 at 8:20 am)Sheldon Wrote:
(July 1, 2024 at 9:56 am)Pavlov Wrote: I do reject it explicitly. It's garbage. I hope that clarifies.

Gender is a word, like all words it defines what most people understand it to mean. in this context I am not sure exactly what you're saying, how does one reject common usage of a word? FWIW I remember people rejecting the word gay, when it's etymology changed ot refer to homosexuality, it seems odd to me, like refusing to accept the tide is coming in. 

gender
noun
1. the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.

If you're anticipating a response from Pavlov, you might have a long wait.
[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]
Reply
#45
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
(July 18, 2024 at 9:01 am)Angrboda Wrote:
(July 18, 2024 at 8:20 am)Sheldon Wrote: Gender is a word, like all words it defines what most people understand it to mean. in this context I am not sure exactly what you're saying, how does one reject common usage of a word? FWIW I remember people rejecting the word gay, when it's etymology changed ot refer to homosexuality, it seems odd to me, like refusing to accept the tide is coming in. 

gender
noun
1. the male sex or the female sex, especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones, or one of a range of other identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female.

If you're anticipating a response from Pavlov, you might have a long wait.

Yes, I see now that he's banned, I was just curious what he was actually rejecting, and why of course.
Reply
#46
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
When it comes to between the Tories and Labour it seems to me that Labour is the lesser evil. But I voted Green.
Schopenhauer Wrote:The intellect has become free, and in this state it does not even know or understand any other interest than that of truth.

Epicurus Wrote:The greatest reward of righteousness is peace of mind.

Epicurus Wrote:Don't fear god,
Don't worry about death;

What is good is easy to get,

What is terrible is easy to endure
Reply
#47
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
Labour is planning to award above inflation pay rises to Nurses and Teachers, quelle surprise at least we know whose palms Starmer feels the need to grease...
Wales is repealing the 20MPH limit in September 1 year and two first ministers after they introduced it.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?
-Esquilax

Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.
Reply
#48
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
(July 21, 2024 at 3:19 pm)Mr Greene Wrote: Wales is repealing the 20MPH limit in September 1 year and two first ministers after they introduced it.

Thank fuck for that, I am so sick of trundling along at ten miles an hour in second gear, watching people slam their brakes on at every junction and roundabout...for some inexplicable reason. By all means extend the 20mph limit if need be, but this was an asinine law.
Reply
#49
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
Seems that something is fishy with Labour:

Twelve months before seizing power in last week’s historic election victory, Keir Starmer and the Labour Party welcomed with open arms an unprecedented lobbying campaign by the UK’s most powerful corporations.

Weapons manufacturers implicated in human rights abuses in Gaza bent the ears of would-be defence secretaries. Incoming climate change ministers met with oil companies. Labour ministers who will now be responsible for curbing the excesses of the City of London were wined and dined by financial services executives. Public affairs firms representing asset managers, the tobacco industry, gig economy firms and tax-avoiding mega corporations secured meeting after meeting after meeting with future ministers.

In a high-voltage campaign that was simultaneously secretive yet enacted in plain sight, lobbyists worked hard to ensure the policies of the UK’s first ostensibly progressive government in 14 years reflected the interests of their influential clients. And Labour was only too happy to engage.

Westminster’s lax transparency rules mean there is no official record of this mammoth public affairs offensive. The rulebook says the public has no right to know which companies lobby the opposition – a position shared by Starmer’s Labour. In every instance, the party has refused to disclose what was discussed, what promises were made, and even who was at its meetings, saying: “We should not be treated as the government.”[...]
The first revolt is against the supreme tyranny of theology, of the phantom of God. As long as we have a master in heaven, we will be slaves on earth.

Mikhail Bakunin.
Reply
#50
RE: The Ludicrous Labour
Not exactly 'unprecedented', it happens with every prospective government regardless of party.
There are of course lobbyists from trades unions, charities, religions and various other organisations.
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?
-Esquilax

Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Landslide for Labour! BrianSoddingBoru4 7 609 October 17, 2020 at 9:34 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Labour party seeks to deny Gabor Vona entry into the UK kılıç_mehmet 12 4079 January 22, 2014 at 10:07 pm
Last Post: kılıç_mehmet
Smile Proposal for the Reformation of the EU Migrant Labour within the United Kingdom Cerrone 23 6436 November 17, 2010 at 1:58 pm
Last Post: Ashendant
  " the dignity of labour " in recessionary times. bozo 0 1775 February 21, 2009 at 2:48 pm
Last Post: bozo



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)