Hello soulcalm17

[soulcalm17]

Btw, I appreciate you Ferrocyanide, for reviewing the verses one by one. That is good way. Then we can continue to talk a bit academically.
Later on insha Allah I will reply it one by one. It would not possible to me make it in one day, because I have to do my job daily in my office. So please wait.

[The Grand Nudger]

-and again, I would suggest that it is absurd to claim that any book in anyone's possession about any subject in any style is impossible for humans to have made. We're known book makers. Books are a known product of human beings. It's one thing to believe that a god wrote a book. It's another to claim that it would be impossible for people to have written a book. Following?

[Nay_Sayer]

I should mention the holy text of FSM is also impossible for humans to make, which is why only one such book exists.

[soulcalm17]

-and again, I would suggest that it is absurd to claim that any book in anyone's possession about any subject in any style is impossible for humans to have made. We're known book makers. Books are a known product of human beings. It's one thing to believe that a god wrote a book. It's another to claim that it would be impossible for people to have written a book. Following?

Oh.. if it was your meant I agree. What I meant before is it's impossible that the content of the Quran is came from human. While the Quran as a book of course written by human.
Quran was revelated to Muhammad peace be upon him orally words by words by Angel Gabriel. The content is also words by words made by God. Then Prophet spread orally to companions words by words. Later the companions written it as a book. So, what I emphazied is, the source is from God.

[Nay_Sayer]

What I meant before is it's impossible that the content of the Noodlecronomicon came from humans.

While the Noodlecronomicon as a book, of course, was written by a human.

Noodlecronomicon was revealed to Boiardi sauce be upon him by the Angel Gemelli. The content is also words by words made by FSM. The Prophet then spread the good orally to all who would listen

[Disagreeable]

Ramen.

[Angrboda]

What I meant before is it's impossible that the content of the Noodlecronomicon came from humans.

While the Noodlecronomicon as a book, of course, was written by a human.

Noodlecronomicon was revealed to Boiardi sauce be upon him by the Angel Gemelli. The content is also words by words made by FSM. The Prophet then spread the good orally to all who would listen

Is it a sin to mix gochujang and my ramen, father?

[Nay_Sayer]

What I meant before is it's impossible that the content of the Noodlecronomicon came from humans.

While the Noodlecronomicon as a book, of course, was written by a human.

Noodlecronomicon was revealed to Boiardi sauce be upon him by the Angel Gemelli. The content is also words by words made by FSM. The Prophet then spread the good orally to all who would listen

Is it a sin to mix gochujang and my ramen, father?

Nay my son. Verily did FSM say "And may my sustenance if be without zest given new life with herbs to reach peak Picanteness"

RAmen

[Mister Agenda]

-and again, I would suggest that it is absurd to claim that any book in anyone's possession about any subject in any style is impossible for humans to have made.  We're known book makers.  Books are a known product of human beings.  It's one thing to believe that a god wrote a book.  It's another to claim that it would be impossible for people to have written a book.  Following?

Oh.. if it was your meant I agree. What I meant before is it's impossible that the content of the Quran is came from human. While the Quran as a book of course written by human.
Quran was revelated to Muhammad peace be upon him orally words by words by Angel Gabriel. The content is also words by words made by God. Then Prophet spread orally to companions words by words. Later the companions written it as a book. So, what I emphazied is, the source is from God.

Do you know what an argument from indredulity is? It's essentially an argument in the form of 'I don't see how this could possibly be true; therefore it isn't.' Also known as 'appeal to common sense' it is a fallacy in informal logic. It's the same reasoning used to deny that Americans landed a manned craft on the moon or that passenger jets hitting the Twin Towers couldn't have brought them down.

You say no human could have written the Q'uran, but how can you prove it? It seems like a very subjective evaluation, and I would stay away from it as an argument were I you until I could demonstrate that it's true.

[The Grand Nudger]

-and again, I would suggest that it is absurd to claim that any book in anyone's possession about any subject in any style is impossible for humans to have made.  We're known book makers.  Books are a known product of human beings.  It's one thing to believe that a god wrote a book.  It's another to claim that it would be impossible for people to have written a book.  Following?

Oh.. if it was your meant I agree. What I meant before is it's impossible that the content of the Quran is came from human. While the Quran as a book of course written by human.
Quran was revelated to Muhammad peace be upon him orally words by words by Angel Gabriel. The content is also words by words made by God. Then Prophet spread orally to companions words by words. Later the companions written it as a book. So, what I emphazied is, the source is from God.

Just as before, it is absurd to state that the content of any book in anyone's possession about any subject in any style is impossible for humans to have made.  It's a thing we do with some regularity.  

It is one thing for you to strongly believe that the contents of your religion, or your book... came from a god.  It is another to state that the contents of your religion, or your book... cannot possibly have come from humans. Following?