Since evolution doesn't disprove the existence of God

[Nay_Sayer]

Why do you care about FSM so much?

[HappySkeptic]

Can I place a bet how long this sock or troll will be with us?

[Paleophyte]

It's pretty simple.

Humans were the intention of evolution all along. There was no "randomness" (neverminding that "random" in science doesn't mean without intent, it just means that something outside the evolutionary process, which could have been intended all along, affected the process).

Every species which went extinct was pre-destined to go extinct, and every species which evolved was pre-destined to evolve.

Therefore, evolution doesn't disprove special creation.

Sure it does. Here in this single post we see:

- A baseless opinion that is defined as untestable for the sole purpose of shoring up a religion that has failed to do shit for several millennia.
- A scientific theory that revolutionized our understanding of biology in a few decades and has stood up to the most intense scrutiny that the scientific community and the churches could lob its way.

I know which one I'd be looking to at if I wanted to know where we came from.

On a related note, would it be possible to limit your spew to a single rambling thread of cretinist insanity? You've created something like half a dozen different threads on this in just two days. Please don't give the mods RSI.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

Evolution doesn't disprove the existence of God because it's not supposed to disprove the existence of God. Claiming that it should somehow do so is a lot like bitching that your car is not a cappuccino dispenser.

Boru

[Rev. Rye]

And, naturally, creation and evolution aren't mutually exclusive, why do atheists care about evolution so much?

There were atheists long before modern evolutionary biology was a thing (e.x. Epicurus), so why does the existence or nonexistence of evolution matter to them to begin with?

[Mister Agenda]

And, naturally, creation and evolution aren't mutually exclusive, why do atheists care about evolution so much?

There were atheists long before modern evolutionary biology was a thing (e.x. Epicurus), so why does the existence or nonexistence of evolution matter to them to begin with?

Right, evolution only disproves gods that are supposed to have been involved in creating modern species as we see them today and not have used evolution to do it. But that's just a coincidental result of what we've found.

The real question is why so many Creationists direct questions about evolution to atheists instead of biologists?