Posts: 137
Threads: 14
Joined: October 10, 2011
Reputation:
8
RE: One item of significance that you have had forever?
November 8, 2011 at 8:32 am
(November 8, 2011 at 6:25 am)KichigaiNeko Wrote: (November 8, 2011 at 5:40 am)Kayenneh Wrote: I don't tend to get sentimental or collect old stuff. The only object of some sentimental value would be my piano that I've had for almost as long as I've been playing. I have some really old pictures I've drawn too, but I'm too ashamed to show them to other people 
After looking at the quality of Jay's and the SQ's?? I don't blame you :S
I'd actually love to see some of those drawings Kayenneh. I think I have some of my own really old drawings somewhere too, I might root em out. I'll show you mine if you show me yours, maybe?
Oh and back to the OP, The item people pick to talk about doesn't have to have sentimental value, it doesn't even have to belong to you, heck you can flout the thread description altogether and speak on any little thing/scar/lesson learned/ or experience or whatever holds signifigance for you, even if you don't have an item which reminds you of it anymore, or never had it at all. The Idea of the thread was more based around the experience/s anyway than the items themselves
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly realized I was talking to myself." Peter O'Toole.
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: One item of significance that you have had forever?
November 8, 2011 at 11:53 am
Quote:One item of significance that you have had forever?
I have a mole that is probably older than most of the people on this forum.
hock:
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 12586
Threads: 397
Joined: September 17, 2010
Reputation:
96
RE: One item of significance that you have had forever?
November 8, 2011 at 11:54 am
Does it move to various parts of your face?
Posts: 137
Threads: 14
Joined: October 10, 2011
Reputation:
8
RE: One item of significance that you have had forever?
November 8, 2011 at 10:59 pm
(November 8, 2011 at 11:54 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: Does it move to various parts of your face?
I was gonna post the clip from robin hood men in tights, but couldn't find a good one with all the clips of prince johns moving mole, so here are the "moley mole" clips from austin powers instead
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rc5G04nJecI
"When did I realize I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly realized I was talking to myself." Peter O'Toole.
Posts: 12586
Threads: 397
Joined: September 17, 2010
Reputation:
96
RE: One item of significance that you have had forever?
November 8, 2011 at 11:01 pm
lmao, Prince John is EXACTLY who I was thinking of!
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: One item of significance that you have had forever?
November 8, 2011 at 11:11 pm
(November 8, 2011 at 11:54 am)thesummerqueen Wrote: Does it move to various parts of your face?
Well, it is on a "cheek", but I have never noticed it move to the other.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
![[Image: Untitled2_zpswaosccbr.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1140.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fn569%2Fthesummerqueen%2FUntitled2_zpswaosccbr.png)
