Proposition about a new subforum for children

[KichigaiNeko]

Perhaps atheists are naive ..it would seem that the theists are concerned about paedophiles. ??

[Zen Badger]

When you think about it, it would actually be a safe place for kids to be.

Since their forum would be monitored and PM's disabled any funny activity could be watched and reported to the respective ISP and/or the relevant authorities.

Something which doesn't happen in your normal chatroom.

[Blam!]

the backlash will come from doing a google search for atheist+child+forum and once it get out... idk This might actually be the first place I'm aware of regarding atheism that would have a kids section. That in itself is enough of a novelty to attract militant theists.

I considered militant theists as a Internet predators - I'm sure our kids are smarter enough to handle these stupid twits. But I'm not take the chances because Militant theists tend to terrorize and they'll not stay civilized you except them to be.

About Google search- Oh, boy. Miliants theists are in for surprise if they discovered the interesting results of "Religion is" and "Christianity is"

[Oldandeasilyconfused]

Perhaps atheists are naive ..it would seem that the theists are concerned about paedophiles. ??

Not just the theists.

[fr0d0]

I think we should have a kindergarten for those people who can't get past the "no physical evidence of something metaphysical" question. It'd be great... no nonsense following every other post. ....Whadduyathink?

[Shell B]

I think we should have a kindergarten for those people who can't get past the "no physical evidence of something metaphysical" question. It'd be great... no nonsense following every other post. ....Whadduyathink?

We'll just make them point out that there is no metaphysical evidence, either. The testimony of idiots doesn't count, which brings the Christian score down to 0.

[tackattack]

Ya know ...i just had a most interesting convo with an 'Autistic child' regarding eating at a restaurant that was not "sanctioned" by her 'authority figure' (her mum) are theists like this Tacky??

I don't know if theists are like that. I don't have a list of sanctioned places you can and can't go. Now whether I'd let my children do anything by themselves is another story. Perhaps the problems lie with the autism of the child not the theology of the parent? I've known many autistic and handicapped families, and they are most assuredly on a different exponentially higher level of threat awareness and paranoia than the average parent. Understandably though, as those who are less effective at protecting themselves deserve an advocate.

As far as pedophiles, I thought all parents were concerned with that and internet awareness, regardless of your theology. I only expressed a concern for drawing more of the unwanted crowd, making life more difficult for mods and some of the more tolerated around here as it's apt to do. It was merely for selfish reasons, not for any concern for the well being of you heathens!! :ROFLOL: j/k btw, sorry if you don't know me well enough to get that and are offended.

[fr0d0]

I think we should have a kindergarten for those people who can't get past the "no physical evidence of something metaphysical" question. It'd be great... no nonsense following every other post. ....Whadduyathink?

We'll just make them point out that there is no metaphysical evidence, either. The testimony of idiots doesn't count, which brings the Christian score down to 0.

Takers already! Excellent

Of course there is loads of metaphysical evidence as those with metaphysical telescopes could no doubt tell you.

Perhaps we could give this club a secondary name: the "looking for a square circle club". What do you guys think?

[Shell B]

Or we could call it, "Not Seeing is Believing!"

[fr0d0]

No no, in this club strictly only seeing is believing. These are philosophical babies remember