RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 4, 2016 at 9:50 am
That weird sex India shit is sure weird.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
|
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 4, 2016 at 9:50 am
That weird sex India shit is sure weird.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 4, 2016 at 10:01 am
They're in a nice time zone where they seem to only post when I'm sleeping.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 4, 2016 at 10:06 am
(This post was last modified: January 4, 2016 at 10:07 am by Cyberman.)
(January 4, 2016 at 9:49 am)abaris Wrote: The post I reported didn't have a flag of some other user already having filed a report. I always report only one, since you're probably look for yourself when our friend makes another appearance., It really depends which post you're reporting. There were maybe twenty spam threads between the two of them, so you probably got a unique one in your sights.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 4, 2016 at 2:47 pm
Fucking spammers. Had a fucking spam phone call (on the fucking landline) at fucking 6:30 AM today. Fucking fucker wanted my fucking Microsoft Registration information.
Told the fucker I'd rather pound some fucking broken glass up his asshole. He hung up. Fucker. The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 4, 2016 at 3:03 pm
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 6, 2016 at 1:19 pm
Nice sextuple hit from SteelCurtain!
Hehe. Tuple. If you have any serious concerns, are being harassed, or just need someone to talk to, feel free to contact me via PM RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 8, 2016 at 2:45 am
This will be a nice two-week break.
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 8, 2016 at 3:39 am
(January 4, 2016 at 2:47 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Fucking spammers. Had a fucking spam phone call (on the fucking landline) at fucking 6:30 AM today. Fucking fucker wanted my fucking Microsoft Registration information. Guess he's not into kink? RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 8, 2016 at 3:53 am
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2016 at 4:21 am by robvalue.)
When I'm reporting a mass spammer, I always go for their oldest (first) post. I figure if everyone looks at this one, they'll know whether or not the user has already been reported.
I have noticed a drop in the number of spammers lasting very long, good work mods! PS: good call on EP. Dude's getting ridiculous. A timeout is just what he needs, instead of pretending to leave for attention. Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists. Index of useful threads and discussions Index of my best videos Quickstart guide to the forum RE: Peanut Gallery Commentary on the Staff Log of Bannings and such like.
January 8, 2016 at 5:03 am
I tell you what - if he ever sends me another PM or email not related to my role as an admin of this site, like he did today after I've already set a clear boundary ("Leave me alone", which he at first agreed to, until he broke it four minutes later.)....
Let's just say that the result will be an instant and permanent ban. No vote or quorum needed. There's a word, Penguin, for someone who violates someone's express personal boundary - whether you think their reasons are rational or not - and that word is stalker. You have something to say, you can say it in public. EP, if and when you come back, you have an AF restraining order. Stay out of my PM inbox, and stay out of my email inbox unless it is very clearly to do with the operation of this site - and I'm not talking about your personal opinions on that. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|