Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 11, 2024, 10:20 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
Why should any bible-thumping shithead worry about facts when they can just invoke their magic sky-daddy to solve all the problems?

And we have the balls to think of the muslims as backward.
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
(February 25, 2016 at 6:57 pm)Mancunian Wrote:
(February 25, 2016 at 11:16 am)Chas Wrote: It would not be an altitude of 29,000 feet - it would be sea level.

Welcome to my world Chas, glad to see that Drich is not the only one who does not get irony.

Your irony was not at all apparent. People actually make this error in thinking.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
(February 26, 2016 at 12:34 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Why should any bible-thumping shithead worry about facts when they can just invoke their magic sky-daddy to solve all the problems?

And we have the balls to think of the muslims as backward.

They're working on it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/scienc....html?_r=0
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
Looks like the cretinist message hasn't percolated through just yet:

Quote:The degree of acceptance of evolution varies among Islamic countries.

Research led by the Evolution Education Research Center at McGill University, in Montreal, found that high school biology textbooks in Pakistan covered the theory of evolution. Quotations from the Koran at the beginning of the chapters are chosen to suggest that the religion and the theory coexist harmoniously.

In a survey of 2,527 Pakistani high school students conducted by the McGill researchers and their international collaborators, 28 percent of the students agreed with the creationist sentiment, “Evolution is not a well-accepted scientific fact.” More than 60 percent disagreed, and the rest were not sure.

Eighty-six percent agreed with this statement: “Millions of fossils show that life has existed for billions of years and changed over time.”

Wonder how long it will be before that changes?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
(February 26, 2016 at 1:14 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Looks like the cretinist message hasn't percolated through just yet:

Quote:The degree of acceptance of evolution varies among Islamic countries.

Research led by the Evolution Education Research Center at McGill University, in Montreal, found that high school biology textbooks in Pakistan covered the theory of evolution. Quotations from the Koran at the beginning of the chapters are chosen to suggest that the religion and the theory coexist harmoniously.

In a survey of 2,527 Pakistani high school students conducted by the McGill researchers and their international collaborators, 28 percent of the students agreed with the creationist sentiment, “Evolution is not a well-accepted scientific fact.” More than 60 percent disagreed, and the rest were not sure.

Eighty-six percent agreed with this statement: “Millions of fossils show that life has existed for billions of years and changed over time.”

Wonder how long it will be before that changes?

Has Drich been to Pakistan?
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
Pakistan isn't mentioned in the bible, so he probably doesn’t believe it exists.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
(February 26, 2016 at 1:16 pm)Old Baby Wrote:
(February 26, 2016 at 1:14 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Looks like the cretinist message hasn't percolated through just yet:


Wonder how long it will be before that changes? 

Quote: Has Drich been to Pakistan?

Old Baby!  You made me spit Dr. Pepper on my desk!   Spit Coffee
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
[Image: zvwdd.jpg]
I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty. I must not be nasty.
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
(February 26, 2016 at 12:56 pm)Chas Wrote:
(February 25, 2016 at 6:57 pm)Mancunian Wrote: Welcome to my world Chas, glad to see that Drich is not the only one who does not get irony.

Your irony was not at all apparent.  People actually make this error in thinking.

See my later post, theists don't have a monopoly on talking nonsense.
Reply
RE: A question about the flood myth, baraminology, and Pangaea
(February 26, 2016 at 1:14 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Looks like the cretinist message hasn't percolated through just yet:

Quote:The degree of acceptance of evolution varies among Islamic countries.

Research led by the Evolution Education Research Center at McGill University, in Montreal, found that high school biology textbooks in Pakistan covered the theory of evolution. Quotations from the Koran at the beginning of the chapters are chosen to suggest that the religion and the theory coexist harmoniously.

In a survey of 2,527 Pakistani high school students conducted by the McGill researchers and their international collaborators, 28 percent of the students agreed with the creationist sentiment, “Evolution is not a well-accepted scientific fact.” More than 60 percent disagreed, and the rest were not sure.

Eighty-six percent agreed with this statement: “Millions of fossils show that life has existed for billions of years and changed over time.”

Wonder how long it will be before that changes?

That's the point of the article. It is changing. The whole article is about the rise of creationism among Muslims in the past couple of decades, even in places that were ostensibly secular, like Turkey following the election of its own Republican religious fanatics.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Personification in Greek Myth Tea Earl Grey Hot 35 6704 March 30, 2017 at 11:30 am
Last Post: Minimalist
  The Myth of Infallibility Skeptimus Signus 45 4948 April 30, 2016 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  The Evolution of a Myth Mudhammam 10 2835 March 27, 2016 at 1:12 am
Last Post: Mudhammam
  Does myth still have purpose? ComradeMeow 7 2544 August 20, 2014 at 2:38 am
Last Post: ComradeMeow
  A question for those who believe in noahs flood Lemonvariable72 13 3662 July 14, 2014 at 3:47 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Noah's Flood vs Japan? Duke Guilmon 10 6500 June 21, 2014 at 2:39 am
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  Literal belief in the flood story RobbyPants 157 40455 May 22, 2014 at 12:09 pm
Last Post: RobbyPants
  Correct use of the word "Myth" The_Thinking_Theist 13 4902 January 11, 2014 at 5:54 am
Last Post: CYNIC
  I have a question about noah's flood. Lemonvariable72 113 28784 October 2, 2013 at 10:16 pm
Last Post: Bad Writer
  The Noachian Flood Cyberman 78 22974 January 16, 2013 at 10:43 pm
Last Post: jonb



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)