(August 11, 2015 at 1:29 am)Shuffle Wrote: What exactly is the criteria?

Quote:This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia articles cover notable topics—those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time, and are not outside the scope of Wikipedia. We consider evidence from reliable independent sources to gauge this attention. The notability guideline does not determine the content of articles, but only whether the topic should have its own article.

Quote:"Notability" is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance," and even web content that editors personally believe is "important" or "famous" is only accepted as notable if it can be shown to have attracted notice. No web content is exempt from this requirement, no matter what kind of content it is. If the individual web content has received no or very little attention from independent sources, then it is not notable simply because other web content of its type is commonly notable or merely because it exists (see "If it's not notable", below).

When evaluating the notability of web content, please consider whether it has had any significant or demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. High-traffic websites are likely to have more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability. However, smaller websites can also be notable. Arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger websites.

(August 11, 2015 at 1:40 am)Shuffle Wrote: Well, I'll just go an cry now.

(August 11, 2015 at 1:43 am)Jenny A Wrote: There there.  *pats shoulder and looks concerned*

(August 11, 2015 at 12:11 am)Stimbo Wrote: Hence the phrase, "lettuce pray".