I breast fed both girls in public.    I did it in restaurants, in parks, and on planes. Can't remember it being an issue, though I did wear a nursing bra and chose my shirts carefully.   The idea is to feed the child, not put on a show.

Nor only is it good for the baby, it makes life easier for the mother.  Pumping and bottling is not really a good solution.  Milk goes bad if not refrigerated and momma leaks and eventually goes dry if not milked regularly.  Nor to mention that it hurts breasts to skip a meal.

(September 14, 2015 at 9:04 pm)Aractus Wrote: Only complete morons take issue with breastfeeding in public.

It's funny how people distort morality when it suits them. So, kids can't view boobs on TV and they're being censored, kids eyes are being covered but nobody lifts a finger to prevent kids from viewing boobs in public because it's a woman feeding her baby. Boobs are boobs, regardless of where one can see them. If they legaize that, next I'm expecting to legalize public sex in the park because there will be visible boobs and apparently visible boobs are not a problem. Or, using that contradiction and knowing the double standards some kinky people apply, some of you may say it's ok to have public sex for as long the woman is feeding her baby while her lover and/or husband do her doggy style.

I remember once a lady at church was talking to me for a good 30 minutes and then asked me if she could hold my daughter...lol. She was so shocked when I told her the baby was nursing.

(September 14, 2015 at 9:22 pm)Atheist_BG Wrote:

(September 14, 2015 at 9:04 pm)Aractus Wrote: Only complete morons take issue with breastfeeding in public.

It's funny how people distort morality when it suits them. So, kids can't view boobs on TV and they're being censored, kids eyes are being covered but nobody lifts a finger to prevent kids from viewing boobs in public because it's a woman feeding her baby. Boobs are boobs, regardless of where one can see them. If they legaize that, next I'm expecting to legalize public sex in the park because there will be visible boobs and apparently visible boobs are not a problem. Or, using that contradiction and knowing the double standards some kinky people apply, some of you may say it's ok to have public sex for as long the woman is feeding her baby while her lover and/or husband do her doggy style.

Maybe my reader read this wrong but, what you just typed made no sense whatsoever!

(September 14, 2015 at 9:31 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: Maybe my reader read this wrong.

Call it Android and don't insult it anymore.

(September 14, 2015 at 9:22 pm)Atheist_BG Wrote:

(September 14, 2015 at 9:04 pm)Aractus Wrote: Only complete morons take issue with breastfeeding in public.

It's funny how people distort morality when it suits them. So, kids can't view boobs on TV and they're being censored, kids eyes are being covered but nobody lifts a finger to prevent kids from viewing boobs in public because it's a woman feeding her baby. Boobs are boobs, regardless of where one can see them. If they legaize that, next I'm expecting to legalize public sex in the park because there will be visible boobs and apparently visible boobs are not a problem. Or, using that contradiction and knowing the double standards some kinky people apply, some of you may say it's ok to have public sex for as long the woman is feeding her baby while her lover and/or husband do her doggy style.

Are you really an atheist? You have an extremely religious sounding view on a woman's body. Let me give you a news flash, women's bodies are not disgusting. And we aren't sex toys either. Why you think a woman's boobs are so scary when a man can walk around shirtless is beyond me. I think you have serious issues. I always laugh at people who freak out about "oh noes not the children! Protect the children!" Really? In my family most people breastfed their kids and no one was getting locked up in a closet to do so. My kids grew up seeing women nursing right in front of them and they never thought it was strange. When my son was 3ish he grabbed my boob and asked what it was for. My 4 year old daughter replied with "it's for feeding babies duh".

(September 14, 2015 at 9:31 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote:

(September 14, 2015 at 9:22 pm)Atheist_BG Wrote:

---

It's funny how people distort morality when it suits them. So, kids can't view boobs on TV and they're being censored, kids eyes are being covered but nobody lifts a finger to prevent kids from viewing boobs in public because it's a woman feeding her baby. Boobs are boobs, regardless of where one can see them. If they legaize that, next I'm expecting to legalize public sex in the park because there will be visible boobs and apparently visible boobs are not a problem. Or, using that contradiction and knowing the double standards some kinky people apply, some of you may say it's ok to have public sex for as long the woman is feeding her baby while her lover and/or husband do her doggy style.

---

Maybe my reader read this wrong but, what you just typed made no sense whatsoever!

If it makes you feel better...it read like crazy talk to me too

(September 14, 2015 at 9:22 pm)Atheist_BG Wrote: If they legaize that, next I'm expecting to legalize public sex in the park because there will be visible boobs and apparently visible boobs are not a problem.

Oh for fuck sake you idiot.

1. Slippery Slope.
2. Boobs are not any more a sex object than a mouth is.

If the sight of the human body freaks you out so much, maybe you should go try living in Iran.

(September 14, 2015 at 9:36 pm)Napoléon Wrote:

(September 14, 2015 at 9:22 pm)Atheist_BG Wrote: If they legaize that, next I'm expecting to legalize public sex in the park because there will be visible boobs and apparently visible boobs are not a problem.

Oh for fuck sake you idiot.

1. Slippery Slope.
2. Boobs are not any more a sex object than a mouth is.

If the sight of the human body freaks you out so much, maybe you should go try living in Iran.

That's where the big bad Muslims live.

(September 14, 2015 at 9:33 pm)Atheist_BG Wrote:

(September 14, 2015 at 9:31 pm)BrokenQuill92 Wrote: Maybe my reader read this wrong.

Call it Android and don't insult it anymore.

Wrong thread bud. And yes andriod is linux. Linux is just a kernel, small part of the overall OS. still lets not derail this thread.