(December 3, 2015 at 12:34 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Drich, do you really have the balls to say, "says who? You?" to anyone?

only when it applies.

(December 3, 2015 at 2:55 pm)drfuzzy Wrote:

(December 2, 2015 at 9:09 pm)dyresand Wrote: All i am doing in reality is if you are following bullshit at least follow your bullshit the way it was supposed to be followed.

Oh, dyresand, I get that, really I do. I must admit to some gleeful enjoyment when finding things like obvious contradictions in that collection of rancid tripe (aka the bible) that I was forced to memorize as a child.  It's just that there is a huge difference between reading the babble believing that it is sacred and special, and analyzing just another piece of literature. And then, when a Bible-worshiper comes 'round to preach, start "bible studies", as if we'll roll over and convert when his brilliantly <hack-cough> illogical, illiterate, ungrammatical, misspelled take on that trash seeps into our brains - it's just enough to make a person puke.
       It's almost too bad we don't go over to the xtian forums and post threads about wholly babble idiocy - doing the same thing to them that drippy-doodle and his ilk do to us. But it would be a waste of time. They worship that damn book. Who cares what it actually says, they'll make up something so they can keep worshiping it.

do you have examples of said contradictions?

(December 4, 2015 at 11:20 am)Drich Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 2:55 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Oh, dyresand, I get that, really I do. I must admit to some gleeful enjoyment when finding things like obvious contradictions in that collection of rancid tripe (aka the bible) that I was forced to memorize as a child.  It's just that there is a huge difference between reading the babble believing that it is sacred and special, and analyzing just another piece of literature. And then, when a Bible-worshiper comes 'round to preach, start "bible studies", as if we'll roll over and convert when his brilliantly <hack-cough> illogical, illiterate, ungrammatical, misspelled take on that trash seeps into our brains - it's just enough to make a person puke.
       It's almost too bad we don't go over to the xtian forums and post threads about wholly babble idiocy - doing the same thing to them that drippy-doodle and his ilk do to us. But it would be a waste of time. They worship that damn book. Who cares what it actually says, they'll make up something so they can keep worshiping it.

do you have examples of said contradictions?

just go here..  http://bfy.tw/37Re because no one is going to bother listing out every contradiction there is.

(December 4, 2015 at 11:17 am)Drich Wrote:

(December 3, 2015 at 11:23 am)Stimbo Wrote: Then it's an illiterate one.

Summary
noun: a brief statement or account of the main points of something.

adjective:
1. not including needless details or formalities; brief.
2. (of a judicial process) conducted without the customary legal formalities.

Summery:
Of, like, or appropriate for Summer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BGQCVOqvHA

"I've heard it both ways, The right way, and yours..."
-Shawn Spencer

Shaw says this often times when he uses a word the wrong way, or uses the wrong word to describe something.

Sorry if you didn't get it/Sorry you don't get a lot of my hidden jokes, but I guess that's what happens when one gets older

Maybe it's your choice of pop culture reference, given that I don't share your culture. Or that you didn't complete the reference enough for it to be recognisable. Maybe it's just that you're an unfunny git, or a combination of all three. Personally, I would have gone for:

Quote:"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean - neither more nor less."

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."

"The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master - that's all."

but maybe I read more books than you.

Incidentally, is it really possible to hear the difference in spelling between two first order homonyms?

(December 2, 2015 at 12:17 am)dyresand Wrote: The idea of christianity goes against what jesus supposedly wanted. 

Mathew 5:17 enough said 

 Id pick up the OT if i were you.

Matt 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

fulfill - bring to completion

So your point is???

(December 4, 2015 at 12:45 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(December 2, 2015 at 12:17 am)dyresand Wrote: The idea of christianity goes against what jesus supposedly wanted. 

Mathew 5:17 enough said 

 Id pick up the OT if i were you.

Matt 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

fulfill - bring to completion

So your point is???

On what basis have you singled out this chestnut to determine your understanding of all the others?  Wait let me pray that your head doesn't explode just in case you decide to seriously consider what I've said.  

Hahahahahah.  Just kidding.  We both know that isn't going to happen.

(December 4, 2015 at 12:45 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(December 2, 2015 at 12:17 am)dyresand Wrote: The idea of christianity goes against what jesus supposedly wanted. 

Mathew 5:17 enough said 

 Id pick up the OT if i were you.

Matt 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

fulfill - bring to completion

So your point is???

To put it bluntly 

jesus says to follow the OT,  meaning there shouldn't be christians but jewish people who acknowledge that there is a savior
and accepted him that's pretty much it.

(December 4, 2015 at 11:33 am)dyresand Wrote:

(December 4, 2015 at 11:20 am)Drich Wrote: do you have examples of said contradictions?

just go here..  http://bfy.tw/37Re because no one is going to bother listing out every contradiction there is.

Actually they did. It's called the skeptics Annotated bible. It's where some atheist d-bags take a very onesided view of the bible and supposedly point out all the errors in it.. And with in a year a Christian Group put out the skeptic's Annotated bible Answered. where they went line by line pointing out the dishonesty of the SAB and answering all supposed 'questions' and contradictions.

I was hoping that the person who originally made that comment would post a link to the SAB, So I could Post a link to the SABA and say "what else you got?"

(December 4, 2015 at 11:39 am)Stimbo Wrote: Incidentally, is it really possible to hear the difference in spelling between two first order homonyms?

It's not about hearing a spelling difference old sport, it's about using a word "the right way" verses "your way." (It call ironic humor.. uhh look it up)