Atheism is not a religion. It is the absence of religion. The USA claims to have freedom of religion. If we were truly a free country we would change our motto to freedom from religion.

(December 15, 2015 at 4:21 pm)Delicate Wrote:

(December 15, 2015 at 4:08 pm)Pizza Wrote: Why have you said anything substantial?
There is no evidence for an anthropomorphic god. Get over it.

To an idiot, there is no evidence for quantum mechanics either, right?

The difference being is that there is evidence for QM despite any particular individual's ignorance; however, there isn't one shred of evidence for any god for any individual.

(December 14, 2015 at 8:09 pm)Cato Wrote:

(December 14, 2015 at 7:32 pm)Delicate Wrote: Is there something preventing the entire atheist population from finding their feet for some reason?

Dearth of evidence for God.

Like I said, even idiots think there's a dearth of evidence for a spherical earth.

Echoing Cato, you can present evidence for a spherical Earth. Present evidence for this god of yours and we can talk about idiocy.

(December 15, 2015 at 4:27 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Echoing Cato, you can present evidence for a spherical Earth. Present evidence for this god of yours and we can talk about idiocy.

Seeing the quality of posts here, I'm not encouraged. I might with Esquilax, but even he barely makes the grade. 

I did post a link to an article in another thread. Look it up and let's see if you can come up with something half-intelligent.

Why, are you worried that you won't understand anything more than half?

(December 15, 2015 at 4:37 pm)Delicate Wrote: I did post a link to an article in another thread. Look it up and let's see if you can come up with something half-intelligent.

Plantinga is a known ID devotee. He, like all the others of his ilk, don't bother assessing all the evidence and creating a working hypothesis to be tested. He starts with his conclusion and parrots arguments that attempt to lend credibility to his assertions. Plantinga doesn't have anymore evidence for god than you do. If he did, he would be arguing from his evidence and not tired rehashed arguments that only serve to desperately attempt to keep your pet deity out of the unemployment line.

(December 15, 2015 at 4:49 pm)Cato Wrote:

(December 15, 2015 at 4:37 pm)Delicate Wrote: I did post a link to an article in another thread. Look it up and let's see if you can come up with something half-intelligent.

Plantinga is a known ID devotee. He, like all the others of his ilk, don't bother assessing all the evidence and creating a working hypothesis to be tested. He starts with his conclusion and parrots arguments that attempt to lend credibility to his assertions. Plantinga doesn't have anymore evidence for god than you do. If he did, he would be arguing from his evidence and not tired rehashed arguments that only serve to desperately attempt to keep your pet deity out of the unemployment line.

Didn't I predict you wouldn't be able to provide a competent response?

Nothing you've said actually critiques an argument.

I pronounce you an unredeemable idiot asshole. I won't be bothering to read your drivel any longer.

YAY DELICATE'S BACK