Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 9:43 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 15, 2016 at 2:33 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(January 15, 2016 at 1:51 pm)Brian37 Wrote: ...Stop projecting your desires of how you think I should view the world...None of that takes my deep appreciation for my Mom, my best friend Bob, my cat, a sunset, a good movie,  a good book. How dare you.
So it is like I said. You don't actually live like everything is encompassed by scientific knowledge. I'm not trying to 'get into your head'. I'm taking you at your word and holding what you say up in front of you. Maybe you're getting all pissy because you don't like what you see?

NO Chad, your logic is making me pissy. Your childish projecting yourself onto me is making me pissy. If you never spoke to me again my life will continue. I will as I have before you spewed your nonsense,  and will still have a deep appreciation for love and art and metaphor, family and friends and nature. 

I am sorry you don't like the fact I simply don't chalk reality up to a comic book. That is your baggage, not mine. Grow up. Been online for 15 years, you are not the first to make this stupid argument, and unfortunately you wont be the last.

Now for the last time. I can and do have a deep appreciation for art and metaphor. That does not make me an emotionless robot. But this is it, there is no magic to life. There is no need to turn life into a fantasy.
Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 14, 2016 at 3:36 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:
(January 14, 2016 at 3:18 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Why? What is so bad about living in reality?

Because your concept of reality is severely constricted if you actually think that only scientifically verifiable facts count as knowledge. I suspect that while you may profess that, you do not actually live as if that were true.

What about non-reality is knowable? And how do you know that?

I feel sorry for anyone who confuses beliefs and knowledge. That way lies illusion and self-deception.

(January 15, 2016 at 10:54 am)ChadWooters Wrote:
(January 14, 2016 at 6:10 pm)Brian37 Wrote: No just the opposite. Scientific method opens doors.

No one is disparaging the modern scientific method or the innumerable technological advances from which we benefit. All I am saying is that life has a qualitative aspect that cannot be analyzed or appreciated on a purely materialistic level. If your only gauge of what counts as reality is your physical and material well-being, then you have summarily discarded  the entire world of inner personal life that cannot be reduced to physical facts.

And that is not knowledge, it's belief and emotion.

Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 15, 2016 at 1:44 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You're probably better off respecting another users ignore feature Camus.

Perhaps with users who argue on respectful terms...

I wasn't sure how I would have declined, if it wasn't already too late anyway before she put it up.

What is it about that ignore feature which isn't stupid anyway? You either follow the thread, or you don't, doing the former can't be done right when you don't know what others have said. If someone is actually harassing you, then that should be a banning offense. I propose removing the "Ignore" feature, because if you are really intolerant of others having an opinion and too lazy to scan the posts to find out what others are reacting to, then you probably shouldn't be here yourself. Forums don't work like Facebook!
Mr. Hanky loves you!
Reply
Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 15, 2016 at 1:44 pm)Rhythm Wrote: You're probably better off respecting another users ignore feature Camus.

Fair enough...:grumble:
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 15, 2016 at 3:52 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(January 14, 2016 at 3:36 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Because your concept of reality is severely constricted if you actually think that only scientifically verifiable facts count as knowledge. I suspect that while you may profess that, you do not actually live as if that were true.

What about non-reality is knowable? And how do you know that?

I feel sorry for anyone who confuses beliefs and knowledge. That way lies illusion and self-deception.

(January 15, 2016 at 10:54 am)ChadWooters Wrote: No one is disparaging the modern scientific method or the innumerable technological advances from which we benefit. All I am saying is that life has a qualitative aspect that cannot be analyzed or appreciated on a purely materialistic level. If your only gauge of what counts as reality is your physical and material well-being, then you have summarily discarded  the entire world of inner personal life that cannot be reduced to physical facts.

And that is not knowledge, it's belief and emotion.

Are you saying that psychological facts don't count? (Mary's Room, Jackson).
Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
Spiritual knowledge.. well spiritual being that it's coming from a emotion so there
is no knowledge there to be learned. I mean what is spiritual knowledge in the first place
knowledge is knowledge.

On the other hand you have a good definition of knowledge being knowledge about the
world around you and the universe we live in I.E. scientific knowledge. That has hypothesis
and it can be studied, tested, verified. Where as the former spiritual knowledge has none.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
For some folks, it's really important to them that they get to use the word knowledge.  If it means they have to refer to their own particular type of knowledge, they will.  Essentially they're pointing at a doorknob and calling it a ferrari. Once you realize that, it's pretty easy to work out what they're trying to say.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
Having spiritual knowledge is having knowledge in mythology. Nothing more.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 18, 2016 at 1:53 am)Kitan Wrote: Having spiritual knowledge is having knowledge in mythology.  Nothing more.

As a lover of mythology, I resent the comparison.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
RE: Scientific knowledge versus spiritual knowledge
(January 18, 2016 at 2:00 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: As a lover of mythology, I resent the comparison.

Be jaded by the truth.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Fine Tuning Principle: Devastating Disproof and Scientific Refutation of Atheism. Nishant Xavier 97 10930 September 20, 2023 at 1:31 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Using the word Spiritual Bahana 44 4952 October 4, 2018 at 9:24 pm
Last Post: Lek
  Are there any scientific books or studies that explain what makes a person religious? WisdomOfTheTrees 13 2973 February 9, 2017 at 2:33 am
Last Post: Mirek-Polska
  Is atheism a scientific perspective? AAA 358 74779 January 27, 2017 at 7:49 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔ The Joker 348 55290 November 26, 2016 at 11:47 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Cartoons: propaganda versus the giant gorilla Deepthunk 4 2057 October 19, 2015 at 2:33 pm
Last Post: Deepthunk
  Jerry Coyne's new book: Faith Versus Fact Mudhammam 17 6455 August 13, 2015 at 12:22 am
Last Post: smsavage32
  Help: jumped on for seeking scientific proof of spiritual healing emilynghiem 55 19695 February 21, 2015 at 2:54 am
Last Post: JesusHChrist
  Atheism, Scientific Atheism and Antitheism tantric 33 13703 January 18, 2015 at 1:05 pm
Last Post: helyott
  A question about the lifespan of scientific theories. Hammod1612 35 8003 January 16, 2015 at 5:15 am
Last Post: Alex K



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)