Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 3, 2024, 5:26 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
Alot of assumptions in order to get to the desired conclusion.
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
(January 22, 2016 at 5:06 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: That's awesome!  I JUST read TGD for the first time a few months ago and I very much enjoyed it.  Do you have any other recommendations, or favorites, Evie?

Anything by Sam Harris.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22cYcsVPOok

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU6TkfCGlX8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6i08oZmUXZ4
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
(December 12, 2015 at 1:37 pm)athrock Wrote: I have never seen this argument before, so I'm interested in some discussion of it. A philosopher by the name of Alvin Plantinga states it this way:

The Ontological Argument

  1. It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
  2. If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists is some possible world.
  3. If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.
  4. If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.
  5. If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists.
  6. Therefore, a maximally great being exists.

Thoughts?

Every time I see a christer bring up an argument "proving" his particular gawd that starts with "It is possible..." I think of this:

Christer: It is possible that a maximally great being exists.

Me: Well, I guess, maybe. But, it's an insanly small chance.

Christer:[Image: So-Youre-Telling-Me-Theres-a-Chance-In-D...er-Gif.gif]
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
(December 12, 2015 at 1:37 pm)athrock Wrote: I have never seen this argument before, so I'm interested in some discussion of it. A philosopher by the name of Alvin Plantinga states it this way:

The Ontological Argument

  1. It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
  2. If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists is some possible world.
  3. If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.
  4. If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.
  5. If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists.
  6. Therefore, a maximally great being exists.

Thoughts?
a) What does it mean to be "maximally great"? b) What does it mean to "exist"? (the thought of a "maximally great" circle exists... both in my intellect and in my imagination... but what does that mean? Does that satisfy the criteria of whatever it might mean for a "maximally great being" to "exist"?)
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
"Maximally great" is a childish concept. It's just a blatant attempt to leave no room for someone else to come along with a "bigger God".

It often gets forgotten that "God" could be virtually all powerful with respect to this reality, yet be quite normally powered in his own.

The only "evidence" we have is the reality it has supposedly created. And if you think this is the work of a maximally great being, you're very easily impressed.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
(February 4, 2016 at 11:28 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote:
(December 12, 2015 at 1:37 pm)athrock Wrote: I have never seen this argument before, so I'm interested in some discussion of it. A philosopher by the name of Alvin Plantinga states it this way:

The Ontological Argument

  1. It is possible that a maximally great being exists.
  2. If it is possible that a maximally great being exists, then a maximally great being exists is some possible world.
  3. If a maximally great being exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world.
  4. If a maximally great being exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world.
  5. If a maximally great being exists in the actual world, then a maximally great being exists.
  6. Therefore, a maximally great being exists.

Thoughts?

Every time I see a christer bring up an argument "proving" his particular gawd that starts with "It is possible..." I think of this:

Christer: It is possible that a maximally great being exists.

Me: Well, I guess, maybe. But, it's an insanly small chance.

Christer:[Image: So-Youre-Telling-Me-Theres-a-Chance-In-D...er-Gif.gif]

LMFAO! One of my, and the hubby's favorite movies of all TIME.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken. 
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
(February 4, 2016 at 9:08 pm)Helio Nimbus Wrote: Alot of assumptions in order to get to the desired conclusion.

Apparently, under S5 modal logic, only premise 1 is to be assumed for the argument to work.
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
You also have to assume the modal hook in 3. Get rid of the rest of it, look at 1 and 3 together...this is what must be assumed...and it's amusing, because it's also the conclusion, lol. 2, 4 5 and 6 are all tautologies of 1 or 3.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
(February 5, 2016 at 3:21 am)robvalue Wrote: "Maximally great" is a childish concept. It's just a blatant attempt to leave no room for someone else to come along with a "bigger God".
I have to disagree. I find the ontological argument, and the idea of perfection in general, quite intriguing... I don't know that I'd consider it an argument for "God" per se (the definition of god tends to include quite a few more things than simply perfection or maximal greatness or whatever), but as far as such arguments go, I think it may be the best.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
RE: The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God
(February 5, 2016 at 11:44 am)Rhythm Wrote: You also have to assume the modal hook in 3.  Get rid of the rest of it, look at 1 and 3 together...this is what must be assumed...and it's amusing, because it's also the conclusion, lol. 2, 4 5 and 6 are all tautologies of 1 or 3.

Maximally great being is defined by Plantinga to be a necessary being. From what I've read, and I'm no expert when it comes to such logic, but it seems third premise must always be true for necessary entities.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 4853 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  10 Syllogistic arguments for Gods existence Otangelo 84 11819 January 14, 2020 at 5:59 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  How to destroy any argument for God Drich 46 5653 October 9, 2019 at 9:02 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  How To Support Any Argument For God BrianSoddingBoru4 0 523 August 26, 2019 at 4:52 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  How To Easily Defend Any Argument For God BrianSoddingBoru4 5 819 August 22, 2019 at 9:13 pm
Last Post: The Valkyrie
  Quantum Physics Proves God’s Existence blue grey brain 15 2016 January 2, 2019 at 11:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Why are you chasing the idea of the existence of a God? WinterHold 26 3545 August 7, 2018 at 2:05 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  11-Year-Old College Grad Wants to Pursue Astrophysics to Prove God’s Existence Foxaèr 49 7344 August 2, 2018 at 4:51 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Very short argument for God (another clear proof) Mystic 123 24765 January 26, 2018 at 8:54 pm
Last Post: Succubus
  Another argument for God. Mystic 52 9646 January 24, 2018 at 3:28 pm
Last Post: uncool



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)