abortuary?  I had to look that one up.  The term was created by Jerry Falwell in 1989.  Figures.

(July 14, 2015 at 9:14 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Callous and depraved. What kind of country allows this kind of inhumanity to continue?

I hear you Chad.  For a crew to come in there and try to misrepresent the actions of the good people of Planned Parenthood really is depraved.

I cant state this enough about the "pro birth" "screw you after you are born" crowd.

If you are to be consistent about abortion being murder, then don't be half assed about your position. If you really believe that then you should also be willing to go to war with the UK, Europe and Israel whom are all staunchly pro choice.

And again, the pro birth side always wants to just go after the doctor, but just like a bank robbery, if you have two robbers go in and rob that bank, and someone dies as a result, both the robbers are charged equally for that death during the commission of the felony. So if the abortion doctor deserves life in prison or death, again, don't be half assed about it, charge the girl/women equally.

AND I am also sick of the attitude that by the pro birth side, that those who support choice, want girls/women to get pregnant just so we can murder the fetus. BULLSHIT. Pro choice advocates want to reduce unwanted pregnancies. We simply think those life decisions can be, and should be ultimately left up to the female and their doctor.

The pro birth side isn't offering anything up but fear and paranoia.

(February 8, 2016 at 5:38 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote:

(July 14, 2015 at 9:14 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Callous and depraved. What kind of country allows this kind of inhumanity to continue?

I hear you Chad.  For a crew to come in there and try to misrepresent the actions of the good people of Planned Parenthood really is depraved.

I think the right keeps missing that the entirety of the org and the heads ALSO are disturbed by this.

But at the same time in the past I have heard the same assholes on the right whom support the death penalty using the organs of dead prisoners. 

This still does not negate that even without profit, all aspects of any non profit, just like for profit businesses require money to run. There is not one public or private institution, religious or not, that does not require income for upkeep. The crime is profit, not covering costs.

Her defense if she has a good lawyer is going to be that neither she or the specific location she works at was getting rich off this. Now if you want to argue that line wont work on a jury, that is a different story, but as an argument, that would be what a lawyer might use.

And none of this in any case makes a biblical argument against abortion a valid argument. It is still up to the courts, not a holy person, not one religion, but a court, a judge and a jury.

But, just like 9/11 conspiracies, you can edit anything out of context.

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/09/30/c...fraud.html

In case anyone missed it, there was actually an apology for putting out these outrageous unfounded accusations. It may have got buried in the middle of the thread:

Someone should link this thread in a PM to Wooters. I really, really want to see him eat crow.

(February 9, 2016 at 12:20 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Someone should link this thread in a PM to Wooters. I really, really want to see him eat crow.

Good luck on that. Intellectual integrity never struck me as being terribly important to him ... I doubt he'll start now.

I guarantee he takes the same approach my sister did on FB. Search around the internet for an anti-choice article that has come up with some angle wherein justice has been corrupted.

The Grand Jury didn't even vote on the charges against PP!
The ADA used to work for PP!
How are undercover journalists supposed to be undercover if they don't forge government documents or attempt blatant entrapment?!?

And don't forget, tonight's special guest...


SATAN.