(March 3, 2011 at 8:40 am)tackattack Wrote: The state shouldn't be giving money to homophones, ....

Would that be one of these?

(March 3, 2011 at 9:00 am)DoubtVsFaith Wrote:

Adrian Wrote:Yes, both racists and Nazis should be able to foster children, as long as they are looking after the children. By "this is something we shouldn't be teaching kids" you actually mean "this is something I don't think we should be teaching kids".

How could it be something we should be teaching kids? Are you suggesting that racism is a belief system that has a possibility of being right?

No, he's suggesting that *foster* parents have the right to pollute *foster* children's heads with evil nonsense so when they give them back to the state in 2 or 3 years they are even more fucked up than when they got there.

Sounds like a great idea, doesn't it?

Because someone will not say homosexuality is 'acceptable' they are compaired to racists and nazis. They are in some way 'polluting' childrens minds with 'evil nonsense' and they would be 'fucking them up'.

Oh yeah.... any rational reasonable person can see that.

(March 3, 2011 at 9:24 am)Dotard Wrote: Because someone will not say homosexuality is 'acceptable' they are compaired to racists and nazis. They are in some way 'polluting' childrens minds with 'evil nonsense' and they would be 'fucking them up'.

Oh yeah.... any rational reasonable person can see that.

Well, he was actually using racists & Nazi's foster parents as an example Dotard. Do try to keep up.

BTW, for all we know this couple told the social worker that homosexuality is an abomination before god.

I believe it was you discriminatory people who first started the compairison to Nazis and Racists. He was just running with that. Do try to pay attention.

And SO WHAT if they said they believe it is an abomination before their God. What's next? You gonna advocate if an applicant states they will be taking the FC to church every sunday and sending them to vacation bible school in the summers they should be denied, because they will be 'polluting' their minds and 'fucking them up', any adoption priviledges?

I'm trying to stand on your slope here, but I keep slipping.

(March 3, 2011 at 9:38 am)Dotard Wrote: I believe it was you discriminatory people who first started the compairison to Nazis and Racists. He was just running with that. Do try to pay attention.

Yes, I am authoritarian & discriminatory because I agree that racists & homophobes affect on society should be marginalized. That makes perfect sense.

(March 3, 2011 at 9:46 am)Jaysyn Wrote: Yes, I am authoritarian & discriminatory because I want to marginalize racist's & homophobe's affect on society. That makes perfect sense.

Yes it does because that is exactly what you are doing.

(March 3, 2011 at 9:49 am)leo-rcc Wrote:

(March 3, 2011 at 9:46 am)Jaysyn Wrote: Yes, I am authoritarian & discriminatory because I want to marginalize racist's & homophobe's affect on society. That makes perfect sense.

Yes it does because that is exactly what you are doing.

Well, as I am not an anarchist and have no issues with the government actually putting forth some effort to protect protected classes, I am perfectly fine with you feeling that way.

Wait, hold your homophone.....

You said if you don't have children of your own then your opinions on child raising is worthless.

So, with that logic, if your not smoking sausages or tossing salads your opinions on homosexuality are worthless.

So tell me, do your opinions on homosexuality have worth?

(March 3, 2011 at 10:00 am)Dotard Wrote: Wait, hold your homophone.....

You said if you don't have children of your own then your opinions on child raising is worthless.

So, with that logic, if your not smoking sausages or tossing salads your opinions on homosexuality are worthless.

So tell me, do your opinions on homosexuality have worth?

My opinion of equality is just fine for this discussion. It's also more worthy than your weak comparison of child rearing & sexual preference.