Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 23, 2024, 8:56 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My views on objective morality
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 6:01 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 5:21 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yes, I believe He knows what we will choose. But that doesn't mean He is responsible for us choosing it, or forcing us to choose it. He knows that even though we all make immoral choices at times, in the end, the good of having free will is going to outweigh the bad. That's why He set it up like that.

If I knew my toddler son will choose to wander out onto a freeway, and I did nothing, would i not be complicit in his death?

Are we not toddlers compared to your god and your devil?

I don't know what we are compared to God. 

The difference between a human parent running out to grab their toddler son off the street, and God changing things that would naturally happen, is that for God to do it would require divine intervention. And like Tibs said, you start getting into a slippery slope. Why didn't God stop the toddler from getting hit by a car? Why didn't God stop my brother from getting severe food poisoning last week? Why didn't God prevent me from stubbing my toe? If God were to prevent every negative thing that were about to happen, we wouldn't have free will anymore.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 6:49 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 6:01 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: If I knew my toddler son will choose to wander out onto a freeway, and I did nothing, would i not be complicit in his death?

Are we not toddlers compared to your god and your devil?

I don't know what we are compared to God. 

The difference between a human parent running out to grab their toddler son off the street, and God changing things that would naturally happen, is that for God to do it would require divine intervention. And like Tibs said, you start getting into a slippery slope. Why didn't God stop the toddler from getting hit by a car? Why didn't God stop my brother from getting severe food poisoning last week? Why didn't God prevent me from stubbing my toe? If God were to prevent every negative thing that were about to happen, we wouldn't have free will anymore.

So.... conceptually... what's the difference between a non-interventionalist god and a non-existent god?
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 6:53 pm)pocaracas Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 6:49 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I don't know what we are compared to God. 

The difference between a human parent running out to grab their toddler son off the street, and God changing things that would naturally happen, is that for God to do it would require divine intervention. And like Tibs said, you start getting into a slippery slope. Why didn't God stop the toddler from getting hit by a car? Why didn't God stop my brother from getting severe food poisoning last week? Why didn't God prevent me from stubbing my toe? If God were to prevent every negative thing that were about to happen, we wouldn't have free will anymore.

So.... conceptually... what's the difference between a non-interventionalist god and a non-existent god?

Well, you're asking a theist that lol. If God didn't exist I don't think anything would exist at all.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 6:53 pm)pocaracas Wrote: So.... conceptually... what's the difference between a non-interventionalist god and a non-existent god?

Well, you're asking a theist that lol. If God didn't exist I don't think anything would exist at all.

You think wrong, Very very very very wrong
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

      Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg]
                                                                                         
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 6:53 pm)pocaracas Wrote: So.... conceptually... what's the difference between a non-interventionalist god and a non-existent god?

Well, you're asking a theist that lol. If God didn't exist I don't think anything would exist at all.

There is no evidence that supports that.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 7:38 pm)Chas Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Well, you're asking a theist that lol. If God didn't exist I don't think anything would exist at all.

There is no evidence that supports that.

Ok. Never said there was.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 7:42 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 7:38 pm)Chas Wrote: There is no evidence that supports that.

Ok. Never said there was.

I've got the toenail clippings of Saint Peter, which can protect you and your family from further attacks of food poisoning.

Don't believe me? Why not?

You don't know me all too well, but you do know me a lot better than you ever did the apostle Paul.
Mr. Hanky loves you!
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 12:29 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I think the case with God and his signs, is that God is manifestation of his signs and his signs are also manifestations of God. They have this double relationship.

The signs point to God precisely because God is what reveals them and manifests them.
circles are bad
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 7:55 pm)bennyboy Wrote:
(March 12, 2016 at 12:29 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I think the case with God and his signs, is that God is manifestation of his signs and his signs are also manifestations of God. They have this double relationship.

The signs point to God precisely because God is what reveals them and manifests them.
circles are bad

Do you what 'if and only if' means? It's a double implication. It's used in university a lot regarding math laws for example.
Reply
RE: My views on objective morality
(March 12, 2016 at 5:21 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yes, I believe He knows what we will choose. But that doesn't mean He is responsible for us choosing it, or forcing us to choose it. He knows that even though we all make immoral choices at times, in the end, the good of having free will is going to outweigh the bad. That's why He set it up like that.

If we are to have a personal and meaningful relationship with God, then our actions have to be meaningful. Christians often say things like "When it's your time to go, it's your time to go." But if God sees all, even through time, then it's also "When it's your time to have a shit, it's your time to have a shit." Everything is known by God.

Okay, so it's known by God if/when you will pray, if/when sinners will repent, if/when heretics will fall back in line with the Catholic dogma, etc. It will never, ever turn out other than God already knows it will turn out.

I'm not sure you know what free will means.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Beauty, Morality, God, and a Table FrustratedFool 23 3398 October 8, 2023 at 1:35 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  On theism, why do humans have moral duties even if there are objective moral values? Pnerd 37 4632 May 24, 2022 at 11:49 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Is Moral Nihilism a Morality? vulcanlogician 140 15523 July 17, 2019 at 11:50 am
Last Post: DLJ
  Subjective Morality? mfigurski80 450 54820 January 13, 2019 at 8:40 am
Last Post: Acrobat
  Law versus morality robvalue 16 1774 September 2, 2018 at 7:39 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Objective Standard for Goodness! chimp3 33 6947 June 14, 2018 at 6:12 pm
Last Post: bennyboy
  Objective morality: how would it affect your judgement/actions? robvalue 42 9877 May 5, 2018 at 5:07 pm
Last Post: SaStrike
  dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality Mystic 18 4351 May 3, 2018 at 10:28 am
Last Post: LastPoet
  The Objective Moral Values Argument AGAINST The Existence Of God Edwardo Piet 58 15941 May 2, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Last Post: Amarok
  Can somebody give me a good argument in favor of objective morality? Aegon 19 5177 March 14, 2018 at 6:42 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 73 Guest(s)