Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 21, 2024, 4:52 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Controversial views
RE: Controversial views
(April 23, 2016 at 10:39 am)abaris Wrote:
(April 23, 2016 at 10:33 am)Yeauxleaux Wrote: If you're a lesbian, supposedly attracted to women, why do you date "women" who look like ugly fat men?

By the same token you could ask, why do men date women being rather on the strong side. I once dated a girl, who really didn't have the ideal body measurements, but her personality made more than up for it. She was sexy because of her charisma, not because of her looks, although her face actually was pretty.

I feel like when guys do it though, they'll date a tomboy kind of woman, but she's still clearly female from a mile away. There's no ambiguity there. Same thing for gay men, they might date a feminine man, but he's still clearly a man.

I don't mean to make it sound like I'm so hung up on just looks, which is probably how my post sounded tbh. It's more the dating a woman who looks more like a man that confuses me.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane"  - sarcasm_only

"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable."
- Maryam Namazie

Reply
RE: Controversial views
Agreed with that. I always wondered the physical attarction. Is it the vaginas themselves? Somehow butches have better looking vaginas and all LGBTs "know" this?

When I lived in rural western NC in 1998, two of my three housemates were butch, fat lesbians, and it always puzzled me how there were so many that were in that boat (I went to an SGA meeting at Western Carolina University, 30 mi. away).

But, tbdh, there are so many attractions and fetishes out there. It's confounding. Whatever floats your boat. I'll keep looking for my dainty young lady in a polka dot skirt, saddle shoe and killer lipstick.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Reply
RE: Controversial views
(April 23, 2016 at 2:53 pm)c172 Wrote: Agreed with that. I always wondered the physical attarction.

Do you think there is such a thing as purely physical attraction? I mean, I can look at supermodels, appreciating their body and yet not being attracted at all. I can look at other women, not fitting the ideal and crave for them.

Beauty alone doesn't do anything at all for me. If the personality isn't there, there's no attraction. And I don't even mean having to talk to someone to learn that. Sometimes looking at them is enough. I can't say what it is, but some women simply are attractive to me, and I don't necessarily mean that in a physical way. It may coincide, but it doesn't have to.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Controversial views
For me, I'm 40, single, and never intend to marry. I can look at a young woman and enjoy her physical beauty immensely without even paying attention to her personality. 

But certainly, if the personality is negative enough, looks, however awesome, don't matter, at least as much.
"For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
Reply
RE: Controversial views
(April 23, 2016 at 3:02 pm)c172 Wrote: But certainly, if the personality is negative enough, looks, however awesome, don't matter, at least as much.

At least for me there's such a thing as bland beauty. The proportions are right, but I can't muster any feelings beyond appreciating the proportions. Which is about in the same attraction region as looking at a stone statue.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Controversial views
(April 23, 2016 at 2:53 pm)c172 Wrote: Agreed with that. I always wondered the physical attarction. Is it the vaginas themselves? Somehow butches have better looking vaginas and all LGBTs "know" this?

But, tbdh, there are so many attractions and fetishes out there. It's confounding. Whatever floats your boat. I'll keep looking for my dainty young lady in a polka dot skirt, saddle shoe and killer lipstick.
I don't see how it could be. I mean, transwomen who still have penii (generally) aren't sexually attractive to me even if they are really attractive... but at the same time I'm not necessarily turned off by a passable transman who still has a vagina. Maybe I'm just basing it on my attraction, as I'm more attracted to secondary sex characteristics (male body shape, facial and body hair, mens' features etc) than I am to genitals.

But I definitely second "whatever floats your boat". I'm not saying any of this to mean I'm against very butch lesbians dating or being together, I just don't necessarily understand it.

It's actually none of my business, but hey, I guess I'm just a people watcher.
"Adulthood is like looking both ways before you cross the road, and then getting hit by an airplane"  - sarcasm_only

"Ironically like the nativist far-Right, which despises multiculturalism, but benefits from its ideas of difference to scapegoat the other and to promote its own white identity politics; these postmodernists, leftists, feminists and liberals also use multiculturalism, to side with the oppressor, by demanding respect and tolerance for oppression characterised as 'difference', no matter how intolerable."
- Maryam Namazie

Reply
RE: Controversial views
(April 23, 2016 at 3:21 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote: But I definitely second "whatever floats your boat". I'm not saying any of this to mean I'm against very butch lesbians dating or being together, I just don't necessarily understand it.

Truth is, you have to view it on an individual level. People are attracted to different things. Regardless of their sexual orientation. I have a friend or aquaintance, it's not a very close friend. He, being a slender guy, is in a long term relationship with an incredibly fat woman and I kept thinking, I could never date her. But watching them interact told me a different tale. They simply matched and I can't even say why. They just did.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: Controversial views
OK this is a well sourced post about animal testing. I'll keep looking for more. If anyone finds proper rebuttals on the net, I'd be interested.

Basically, humans are too different to animals for the results to be meaningful.

http://www.peta2.com/boards/topic/33-rea...pointless/
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: Controversial views
Brian was quite a ways off of looking like my 'type', and that contributed to the difficulties I had in understanding my feelings for him. He wasn't older than me, he lacked about 50 to 75 pounds of mass and lord knows, he wasn't hairy.

Any time I contemplated my melt down over him and the subsequent bout of depression, I was mystified, WTF is it about Brian that has the power to make me miserable ??

I attributed it to there not being anything 'special' about Brian beyond encountering him in the midst of the AIDS crisis, and his literally being 'one too many' for me to handle, the implication being, whoever I was going to encounter in that time frame was going to trigger a crisis in me because I was at the very limits of what I could stand in regards to all the horror and death around me.

I look back and realize for me, my understanding of myself was in considerable error as I was assuming I was shallow, and only/mostly appearance driven regarding to the physical type of man I would be attracted to emotionally.

It is much easier now for me to not be too consumed with thoughts like "what do they see in each other??" as there can be a profound factor in the attraction equation, if you will, that will not be evident to anyone else. But its as real as anything to anyone who does 'see' it.

I've also noticed old pictures I have of Brian now image a strikingly handsome man, and that is not how I experienced Brian at the time. Weird and telling, had he been attractive to me at the time, my 'type' in other words, and I had reacted similarly, I might never have realized his actual appeal, and just attributed my response to his hunky hairy masculine presence, and not anything beyond that (hypothetical) hot exterior.

Damn, life is easier for shallow people, and damn me for not being authentically shallow . . . .
 The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it. 




Reply
RE: Controversial views
Most of my views on education probably.

-It'll be a great day when Schools get all the money they need, and the Air Force has to hold a bake sale to build bombers.
-Education is not just about preparing you for a job, it's about preparing you for life.
-School choice is a bad idea.  Private Schools can deny anybody they want, and can kick students out at their own volition.  It's fine that they're able to do that, but they should not receive public funding.  If someone wants to send their kids to private school, they should pay for it themselves.  We can't take from public schools to give to private ones.  More over school choice opens up to what we see at the college level: Scams like University of Phoenix in for-profit universities.  A degree from for-profit schools are practically worthless.  Big no to Vouchers.
-Yes, your tax money goes to pay for schools even if you don't have kids.  If you want to live in a world where people are idiots, by all means start your own country.
-One of the biggest problems with our education system is that people view Academia and intellectualism as bad things.  We value Athletic Achievement too much, and Academic Achievement too little. 
-It's absolutely depressing whenever I hear some of my smartest students tell me they're not sure they'll be able to go to college because they cannot afford it.  Students in good academic standing should not have to worry about how they're going to pay for college.
The whole tone of Church teaching in regard to woman is, to the last degree, contemptuous and degrading. - Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Do you have friends who don’t share your political views? Losty 13 1830 November 19, 2018 at 12:00 am
Last Post: GrandizerII
  your views on modern day porn consumption Catholic_Lady 140 10019 September 21, 2016 at 9:43 pm
Last Post: Excited Penguin
  The most controversial shirt in Rock history. Exian 10 2327 June 29, 2015 at 2:50 pm
Last Post: Longhorn
  Pacifists views on prisons? Phish 6 1636 March 9, 2013 at 9:04 am
Last Post: Kayenneh
  How Do I Change My "Religious Views"? dudeofawesome 11 3651 February 12, 2013 at 3:22 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Curious about different views on homosexuality FemmeRealism 77 30261 November 11, 2012 at 8:13 pm
Last Post: Polaris
  Parenting - Split parental views. Spencer 14 6365 August 5, 2010 at 11:29 pm
Last Post: Spencer



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)