My pleasure
|
My case against Creationism and Infinite regression
|
(April 24, 2016 at 2:57 am)pool the great Wrote:(April 23, 2016 at 3:21 pm)SteveII Wrote: It's interesting that the first three comments you got were encouraging and piled on the typical phrases that makes them happy to type. No one bothered to point out that your premises are misconceived and your reasoning is flawed. The concept is real enough. You are confusing a potential infinite with an actual infinite. RE: My case against Creationism and Infinite regression
April 24, 2016 at 9:06 am
(This post was last modified: April 24, 2016 at 9:08 am by SteveII.)
deleted. clarified in subsequent post
(April 24, 2016 at 8:33 am)SteveII Wrote:(April 24, 2016 at 2:57 am)pool the great Wrote: A car going at a constant speed of 3km/hr could travel for an infinite amount of time and still not overtake a truck going at a constant speed of 4km/hr. Does this show that infinity is a real thing? Thanks for the clarification!
I lurv infinite regressions . . .
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Oh my . . .
Escher GIFs !!
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Oh my!!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|