(April 22, 2016 at 11:39 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:

(April 22, 2016 at 1:00 am)Godschild Wrote:  A man died, he was also God but without His powers. Christ laid down his powers in heaven to become a man capable of sin. If Christ had come with his powers He would not have been able to sin, this is very important to understand, if you don't you'll never be able to understand why He was the perfect man (sinless) who sacrificed his life for mankind. See what happens when you refuse to study the scriptures and find out what they actually say, you make your own version of the story, a version that's little more than a lie.

GC

According to the Bible you're going to be tossed into the lake of fire for bitching about my interpretation of your favorite ethnocentric Middle Eastern Jewish religious fairy tale.

 How's that, you do have biblical proof, please share with us.

GC

(April 22, 2016 at 7:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: psst...you can't use the Bible to prove the Bible.  Tell your mates.

Boru

 So that means you can't use scientific books to prove things of science in that book.

GC

(April 23, 2016 at 6:38 am)Constable Dorfl Wrote:

(April 22, 2016 at 6:55 pm)Godschild Wrote:  I didn't, I'm responding to your lack of understanding of the scriptures.

You did, by accusing him of the deliberately prickish act of intentionally blinding others to him. So yeah, GC believes his imaginary friend is a prick.

Oh, and thanks for at least having the decency of not going the idiotic route of trying to prove the voice in your head is not your imagination, GC. It seems that you may be learning something after all, viz not ot argue a point with those who know more on the subject than you do.

 No I didn't I showed you what God said through the Bible (God's Word), it's you who have the problem of understanding the simplest of statements made in the scriptures even when the verses are given to you. The proof of the scriptures is in the pudding so to speak. This is proof that the scriptures are tell us the truth. As for you or any other atheist on this site knows more about what the Bible says, well I say nope.

GC

posted in wrong area.

(April 24, 2016 at 10:01 pm)Godschild Wrote:

(April 22, 2016 at 7:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: psst...you can't use the Bible to prove the Bible.  Tell your mates.

Boru

 So that means you can't use scientific books to prove things of science in that book.

GC

Not if that book is the only one making that claim, and is vague (to put it mildly) about its methods of finding that information, no.

But, as usual, you maintain a zero grasp on how science works, and why what's in a science book is vetted in a way that the Bible could never hope to achieve.

You're also completely missing the point-- when you ask us for a scriptural reason your faith is incorrect (allowing you to play whack-a-mole with the concept of interpretation), it's like asking me to use The Lord of the Rings to disprove Middle Earth's mythology.

(April 18, 2016 at 11:54 am)Cherubim Wrote: Hello,

I am here only to share the truth. I will answer any serious and coherent questions you might have.
If you are not willing to learn the answer, do not ask the question.

My answer can come in the form of text or video. Most of your questions will require a lot of knowledge, so again, if you're not willing to learn the answer, do not ask the question. This is for people that want to learn the truth and not the average internet warrior that feels powerful by spitting out 20 unrelated questions thinking I am not answering because his questions were just so good.

No profanity or insults or blasphemy. Be respectful.

If you want to know who I am and my background just youtube: "Angels, Alchemy, Aliens, Demons and God - My testimony"

To know a little about me for the purpose of this thread:

1. I only read the textus receptus (King James Bible) and consider all the modern bible versions to be horrible frauds. Which they are, because they are based on the LXX manuscripts, proven frauds.

2. I have no denomination. I am a King James only, Salvation is by grace through faith alone without works, creationist, young earth Christian. I reject evolution with my whole being.

If you give me verses from the NIV, ESV or some other Bible that make no sense, I will ignore your question. Kjv only.

Let's begin.

I love how people join boards they don't own and or not mods or admins on, then make demands about the conduct. 

I do value human right yes, but I don't have to value everything that you type. Ideas as claims do not deserve to be criticism or blasphemy free.

(April 18, 2016 at 12:15 pm)Cherubim Wrote:

(April 18, 2016 at 12:12 pm)Alex K Wrote: May I ask what background that is?

Not really important for this thread. Ask questions relating to Christianity, evolution, the truth about God, etc. Personal questions about me should be limited as they do not contribute.

The fuck it isn't. You walk into a doctor's office, no degrees on the wall and you ask them where they got their degree and they say "Not really important for your visit"....... Do you have any clue how stupid you sound?

(April 24, 2016 at 10:42 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote:

(April 24, 2016 at 10:01 pm)Godschild Wrote:  So that means you can't use scientific books to prove things of science in that book.

GC

Not if that book is the only one making that claim, and is vague (to put it mildly) about its methods of finding that information, no.

But, as usual, you maintain a zero grasp on how science works, and why what's in a science book is vetted in a way that the Bible could never hope to achieve.

You're also completely missing the point-- when you ask us for a scriptural reason your faith is incorrect (allowing you to play whack-a-mole with the concept of interpretation), it's like asking me to use The Lord of the Rings to disprove Middle Earth's mythology.

 I have to much respect for God and His word to play around with interpretations. All science books saying the same thing is no different than having one book. The Bible has been vetted, of coarse not by sources you would accept, I trust God's infallibility and the people He's chosen to lead us.

GC

(April 25, 2016 at 11:42 am)Godschild Wrote: All science books saying the same thing is no different than having one book.

Fail.

You need to take a serious look at WHY and HOW the science books all agree.

Whereas, with your doctrinal "vetting", as you put it, there's no agreement at all.

That's where there are thousands of sub-denominations, why there have been wars fought over "wrong" versions of Christianity, and why you get to play "Whack-a-Mole" (except we're the hammer and the various interpretations are the moles) any time we try to guess what your particular interpretation of the scriptures happens to be.

(April 24, 2016 at 10:01 pm)Godschild Wrote:

(April 22, 2016 at 7:02 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: psst...you can't use the Bible to prove the Bible.  Tell your mates.

Boru

 So that means you can't use scientific books to prove things of science in that book.

GC

You can check on things in science books for yourself given the right equipment.
Why do you not know this?
Are you from the past?