The Good Reverend Wrote:I have met plenty of female mouth breathers in my time and recently as well.

As have I, but I won't be passing up on a chance to be a misandronist when it is offered so readily

Ace Wrote:I vote no to legally carrying guns. We should remember the past and learn from it, so not to repeat it.

You mean the past in which civilians are mowed down for attempting to revolt against oppression?

(April 11, 2011 at 8:11 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: As have I, but I won't be passing up on a chance to be a misandronist when it is offered so readily

And I am misogynistic only when it REALLY matters..when she is butt naked on my bed. Thats when women want to be treated like a piece of meat, and I give them all of it that they want

(April 11, 2011 at 3:02 pm)Ubermensch Wrote: I was actually presenting a situation that basically resembled some of the worst mass shootings in history. Vtech, Columbine, and Port Macarthur.

Bullshit. If the teachers/admin of columbine were armed I'd bet a bunch of those innocent kids would still be alive. I did read it, did you read my link? Actual stories and not just some made up bullshit.
Well, they could be made-up, but I would tend to believe they are actual recants of actual situations.

(April 11, 2011 at 8:20 pm)reverendjeremiah Wrote:

(April 11, 2011 at 8:11 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: As have I, but I won't be passing up on a chance to be a misandronist when it is offered so readily

And I am misogynistic only when it REALLY matters..when she is butt naked on my bed. Thats when women want to be treated like a piece of meat, and I give them all of it that they want

Eeewwww, bloody meat in *my* sink?! Who the hell put it there?! I'll kill them!

Not aimed at you, of course... there *really is* bloody meat in my sink.

Anyway, I'm glad you give people what they want in sex

(April 11, 2011 at 10:13 pm)Dotard Wrote:

(April 11, 2011 at 3:02 pm)Ubermensch Wrote: I was actually presenting a situation that basically resembled some of the worst mass shootings in history. Vtech, Columbine, and Port Macarthur.

Bullshit. If the teachers/admin of columbine were armed I'd bet a bunch of those innocent kids would still be alive. I did read it, did you read my link? Actual stories and not just some made up bullshit.
Well, they could be made-up, but I would tend to believe they are actual recants of actual situations.

Ah yes, because it'd only ever be trained and responsible staff members who were armed and not every cowboy douchebag student who decided it'd be cool to have a gun and be a hero when bullets start flying. If you were on site during a shooting and had a gun, and you saw someone else who had a gun with no prior knowledge of who was shooting, would you wait to see if they were the shooter by letting them put a few holes in you? Or would you be pro-active in ensuring your own personal safety?

(April 11, 2011 at 8:11 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: You mean the past in which civilians are mowed down for attempting to revolt against oppression?

That never happened, not to my knowledge anyway.

Briton was actually one of the most free nations, still is. What pressured crime to go up was probably due to poverty. Give everyone a knife, stabbings went up. Take'em away, crime rates dropped. Can't stab someone if you haven't got a knife.
The less guns there are, the less likely you are to being shot. No guns, make them hard to obtain and increase security.
I firmly vote no to guns.

(April 12, 2011 at 7:24 am)Ace Otana Wrote: I firmly vote no to guns.

That's cute. Your nanny-state government doesn't exactly give you a choice in that matter.

(April 12, 2011 at 9:28 am)Jaysyn Wrote:

(April 12, 2011 at 7:24 am)Ace Otana Wrote: I firmly vote no to guns.

That's cute. Your nanny-state government doesn't exactly give you a choice in that matter.

You can still legally own a gun here.

However, I have never met anyone that would want too and nobody has the need to because nobody else is armed. Granted there are shootings here from time to time, however nowhere near the amounts you get in a country like the U.S. where guns are common place.

I'm all for fighting a "nanny state", however, I don't see blocking the right to own something that can easily kill as many people as you have bullets as a nanny state move.

(April 12, 2011 at 9:28 am)Jaysyn Wrote: That's cute. Your nanny-state government doesn't exactly give you a choice in that matter.

We are able to legally own guns over here (of course not allowed to carry them around public). It's just that, we tend not to have them. Smart in my opinion. Guns are designed for one thing and one thing only, to kill. We're better off without them.
Gun crime here is relatively low, and gun restriction is tight as it should be.
I could apply for a gun licence if I wanted too, but choose not to. I disagree with them.

(April 12, 2011 at 7:24 am)Ace Otana Wrote:

(April 11, 2011 at 8:11 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: You mean the past in which civilians are mowed down for attempting to revolt against oppression?

That never happened, not to my knowledge anyway.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peasant_revolts
Or even better...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rev...rebellions

Surely you don't presume all of these occurred without the use of extremely deadly force?

Quote:Briton was actually one of the most free nations, still is. What pressured crime to go up was probably due to poverty. Give everyone a knife, stabbings went up. Take'em away, crime rates dropped. Can't stab someone if you haven't got a knife.
The less guns there are, the less likely you are to being shot. No guns, make them hard to obtain and increase security.
I firmly vote no to guns.

Only... everyone can have a knife. They are remarkably easy to conceal. Sword too if you are doing it right Handguns are much harder to obtain.