Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 7:30 am
(June 19, 2016 at 7:04 am)Stimbo Wrote: No, you didn’t say that - he did. I never claimed that which you ascribe to me, so your insinuating that I did is both arrogant and presumptuous. I also have no burden to prove your negative; that's your bag.
Do you think you can prove that I was saying you can prove what you were saying ? If so, burden of proof.
What may you think you saying "he did" in that above, proves ?
About you putting "no burden to prove your negative", do you think you can prove it wasn't me who was being accused ? If so, burden of proof.
Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation:
12
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 7:34 am
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2016 at 7:35 am by madog.)
(June 19, 2016 at 7:30 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 19, 2016 at 7:04 am)Stimbo Wrote: No, you didn’t say that - he did. I never claimed that which you ascribe to me, so your insinuating that I did is both arrogant and presumptuous. I also have no burden to prove your negative; that's your bag.
Do you think you can prove that I was saying you can prove what you were saying ? If so, burden of proof.
What may you think you saying "he did" in that above, proves ?
About you putting "no burden to prove your negative", do you think you can prove it wasn't me who was being accused ? If so, burden of proof.
You asked for burden of proof ... and I gave it ....
Quote:madog Wrote: ..................
[url=http://atheistforums.org/post-1307315.html#pid1307315][/url]I can prove free will is a woo phrase .....
Gospel according to Robvalue:
1:12 And so sayeth the Rob unto his value, Woo is the way of the saved and unto thee I grant thee free will to woo.
1:9 and thus the rob took of the rib of man and unto our value created Wooman and Wooman was good and mankind lived happily ever after.
Do you now agree? if not prove me wrong .... burden of proof ...
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 7:39 am
(June 19, 2016 at 7:10 am)madog Wrote: (June 19, 2016 at 7:03 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: How do you think that proves free will is a woo phrase ? Do you think I said people don't have the choice to woo ? Do you think I asked him if he could prove free will is a woo phrase ?
Don't care, thought I'd prove it to you anyway and solve the problem 
Do you think you can prove that you have proven it to me and solved the problem ? If so burden of proof.
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 7:47 am
This will be my last time of saying it...
Nobody has a burden of proving that something didn’t happen. It is incumbent on you, in this case, to prove that it did
Have you got the idea now?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 8:18 am
(June 19, 2016 at 7:34 am)madog Wrote: (June 19, 2016 at 7:30 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: Do you think you can prove that I was saying you can prove what you were saying ? If so, burden of proof.
What may you think you saying "he did" in that above, proves ?
About you putting "no burden to prove your negative", do you think you can prove it wasn't me who was being accused ? If so, burden of proof.
You asked for burden of proof ... and I gave it ....
Quote:madog Wrote: ..................
[url=http://atheistforums.org/post-1307315.html#pid1307315][/url]I can prove free will is a woo phrase .....
Gospel according to Robvalue:
1:12 And so sayeth the Rob unto his value, Woo is the way of the saved and unto thee I grant thee free will to woo.
1:9 and thus the rob took of the rib of man and unto our value created Wooman and Wooman was good and mankind lived happily ever after.
Do you now agree? if not prove me wrong .... burden of proof ...
You may think of the definition of the term free will - the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate, the ability to act at one's own discretion.
Do you think that doesn't disprove what you put above ?
Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation:
12
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 8:22 am
(June 19, 2016 at 8:18 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 19, 2016 at 7:34 am)madog Wrote: You asked for burden of proof ... and I gave it ....
Do you now agree? if not prove me wrong .... burden of proof ...
You may think of the definition of the term free will - the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate, the ability to act at one's own discretion.
Do you think that doesn't disprove what you put above ?
No ...
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
Posts: 234
Threads: 2
Joined: June 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 8:49 am
(June 19, 2016 at 8:22 am)madog Wrote: (June 19, 2016 at 8:18 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: You may think of the definition of the term free will - the power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate, the ability to act at one's own discretion.
Do you think that doesn't disprove what you put above ?
No ...
Do you want to prove it doesn't ? If you don't, then you may think it's right to stop this.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 8:51 am
Moderator Notice
Thomas Kelly252525: Please check your PMs before making any more posts. This will be your last warning. We will continue as if you had read it if you continue to ignore it.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 9:24 am
Rob, are the nukes warming up?
He's not so much a vulgar troll, and technically, we could all just stop feeding it. But this one is more subtle but persistent. Reminds me of a pet dog that just won't stop licking his dick while you're trying to eat dinner at the table.
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 815
Threads: 4
Joined: June 2, 2016
Reputation:
12
RE: 1 John 4:1 compared to The No True Scotsman Fallacy and sophisms
June 19, 2016 at 9:26 am
(June 19, 2016 at 8:49 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: (June 19, 2016 at 8:22 am)madog Wrote: No ...
Do you want to prove it doesn't ? If you don't, then you may think it's right to stop this.
Yes ...
Religion is the top shelf of the supernatural supermarket ... Madog
|
