Clinton News Network reports : Clinton IT staffer pleads 5th 125 consecutive times

And secondly, Clinton Superdelegate Chaka Fattah Found Guilty on Corruption Charges

And thirdly, Hilary's friend, the governor of Virginia, is also being investigated by the FBI in relation to the Clinton Foundation.


But nothing to see here. Clinton did absolutely nothing wrong. Hilary can never do wrong.

Can't wait until Wiki Leaks releases the next round of e-mails. Julian says the next batch will be even more damaging to Hilary.

Can't wait until Hillary is President of the United States, and then people continue their bitching and whining.

(June 23, 2016 at 12:59 pm)Divinity Wrote: Can't wait until Hillary is President of the United States, and then people continue their bitching and whining.

 If Hillary becomes President everyone will have some real reasons to bitch and whine.

(June 23, 2016 at 4:54 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:

(June 23, 2016 at 12:59 pm)Divinity Wrote: Can't wait until Hillary is President of the United States, and then people continue their bitching and whining.

 If Hillary becomes President everyone will have some real reasons to bitch and whine.

If people think people are bitching and whining about Hilary now, just wait until she sends thousands of ground troops into the Middle East, at least in part because al-Saud gave millions to the Clinton Foundation and Saudi wants al-Assad gone! Millions more homeless refugees will come, Europe will slide further towards Fascism, and we know the United States reluctant to take in any of the refugees that will be made homeless because Hilary has this fetish for war. It's so sad that people this fetish a warmonger like Hilary.

You want to worry about the middle east, then you should be worried about Trump. He'd tear up the Nuclear Deal with Iran. He'll piss off all sorts of people. If you've actually read a fucking thing about Hillary's stances (Hint: you haven't) you'd know that she supports the Iran Deal that is in place, and that Donald Trump doesn't. And if you knew anything about US politics, a President can't declare war unilaterally without congress. Of course that seems to fly right over your head.

Of course I'm far more concerned about who is going to replace Ginsberg, Scalia, and any other justices that may pass in the next few years. I'm concerned about gay rights, the minimum wage, and not wasting money alienating other countries or entire fucking religions.

(June 23, 2016 at 5:29 pm)Divinity Wrote: You want to worry about the middle east, then you should be worried about Trump.  He'd tear up the Nuclear Deal with Iran.  He'll piss off all sorts of people.  If you've actually read a fucking thing about Hillary's stances (Hint: you haven't) you'd know that she supports the Iran Deal that is in place, and that Donald Trump doesn't.  And if you knew anything about US politics, a President can't declare war unilaterally without congress.  Of course that seems to fly right over your head.  

Of course I'm far more concerned about who is going to replace Ginsberg, Scalia, and any other justices that may pass in the next few years.  I'm concerned about gay rights, the minimum wage, and not wasting money alienating other countries or entire fucking religions.

From what I've hear, Hillary fought against the Iran deal until it turned out to be working. And then she decided it was a good idea. she's slimy, but Trump is insane. This kind of thing isn't new, but it ticks me off even more because we could have had an actual likeable president this time around, instead of choosing which horrible excuse for a candidate we have to deal with.

LOL! Hilary wholeheartedly supports the Iran Deal? She's taken credit for the Iran Deal but she didn't like it.

REPORT: Hillary Clinton Would Have Tanked The Iran Nuclear Deal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-Fdj7RDzKI

(June 23, 2016 at 5:35 pm)Chad32 Wrote:

(June 23, 2016 at 5:29 pm)Divinity Wrote: You want to worry about the middle east, then you should be worried about Trump.  He'd tear up the Nuclear Deal with Iran.  He'll piss off all sorts of people.  If you've actually read a fucking thing about Hillary's stances (Hint: you haven't) you'd know that she supports the Iran Deal that is in place, and that Donald Trump doesn't.  And if you knew anything about US politics, a President can't declare war unilaterally without congress.  Of course that seems to fly right over your head.  

Of course I'm far more concerned about who is going to replace Ginsberg, Scalia, and any other justices that may pass in the next few years.  I'm concerned about gay rights, the minimum wage, and not wasting money alienating other countries or entire fucking religions.

From what I've hear, Hillary fought against the Iran deal until it turned out to be working. And then she decided it was a good idea. she's slimy, but Trump is insane. This kind of thing isn't new, but it ticks me off even more because we could have had an actual likeable president this time around, instead of choosing which horrible excuse for a candidate we have to deal with.

Thank you! Hilary keeps changing her positions. She's a chameleon. Hilary's positions on issues change weekly so it's pointless to read up on her positions because she's not principled. So it's very insulting of people to say I need to read up on Hilary's policies when she has no principles.

(June 22, 2016 at 5:30 pm)MrNoMorePropaganda Wrote: I'm s glad I don't live in America [...]

The feeling's mutual, we have enough condescending pricks as it is.

(June 23, 2016 at 8:34 am)Aractus Wrote:

(June 21, 2016 at 7:28 pm)bennyboy Wrote: This is so incredibly fucked up that it makes one wonder if there's a deep and systemic fraud going on.

As I've mentioned before there are many problems with the system in America. Primary votes are not really elections, so perhaps there's less scrutiny over it than there should be - I don't really know. What I do know is that the system does not work as designed. Read the Princeton (2014) paper: "When the preferences of economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy."

Having worked as an election officer in California (managing a polling station) several times, I can say that primary elections there are regulated by a county-government agency, the same agency which oversees the general-election process.

They are real elections there, with votes tabulated by government agencies and subject to the same voting laws as the general election.

I cannot speak knowledgeably about other states, including Texas, where I have yet to serve in such a capacity. I hope to do so this year.