First humans? How exactly are you defining that?

Considering we're part of a continuous evolutionary process, it would be rather arbitrary to point to any particular ones. It's only for our own convenience we use such labels.

As far as I'm aware, my parents created my brain.

(July 4, 2016 at 11:00 am)robvalue Wrote: First humans? How exactly are you defining that?

Considering we're part of a continuous evolutionary process, it would be rather arbitrary to point to any particular ones. It's only for our own convenience we use such labels.

If you think humans don't exist and there were never any first humans and men, women, girls, boys, and babies don't exist then do you want to use a different word or words instead of the word humans or do you want to say you don't know what we are ?

(July 4, 2016 at 2:58 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote:

(July 4, 2016 at 11:00 am)robvalue Wrote: First humans? How exactly are you defining that?

Considering we're part of a continuous evolutionary process, it would be rather arbitrary to point to any particular ones. It's only for our own convenience we use such labels.

If you think humans don't exist and there were never any first humans and men, women, girls, boys, and babies don't exist then do you want to use a different word or words instead of the word humans or do you want to say you don't know what we are ?

I want you to go and learn about evolution please. You seem to be under the impression that there was some binary state of existence with the "first humans" just popping up out of nowhere. If that's your position, then there's nothing to discuss, you're simply wrong.

Thomas ... I can't keep it in anymore... You are right! You always have been.

Just like spontaneous combustion is acknowledged to occur on rare occasions, so too does spontaneous creation.
I have discovered a huge coverup in the science world over this.

Maybe there was something there about the Adam and Eve story after all...

Stay strong my friend... nil bastardum carborundum

You heathens all know I'm right! The cat's out of the bag now! Everyone needs to fess up and come clean with your dirty whore mouths!...

Shouldn't that be "nil illegitimi carborundum"?

Now write it out a thousand times. And if it's not done by morning, I'll cut your balls off.

Are Thomas Kelley and Little Rik socks of each other? Both have completely wacky and distinctive arguments that are nonsensical aren't even wrong.

(July 4, 2016 at 10:52 am)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote: If it's thought that the first humans didn't cause their own brains to exist, then it may be thought that they didn't cause their own consciousness. From that it may be thought that they didn't give themselves the ability to do science and the ability to do science was from somewhere else not originally from humans. So it may be thought that, that cause deserves the praise for science and humans don't.

Science is nothing but an attempt at human understanding of the physical and natural world. It requires not a an ounce of praise and it would not exist nor would it have a purpose for existing if not for human beings.

(July 5, 2016 at 8:33 am)Stimbo Wrote: Shouldn't that be "nil illegitimi carborundum"?

Now write it out a thousand times. And if it's not done by morning, I'll cut your balls off.

. . . followed by a trip to the Tossed Salad Man.

[Apologies for ripping off Chris Rock]