http://www.conservapedia.com/Marriage

conservapedia Wrote:Marriage is the divinely ordained union between one man and one woman. (Genesis 2:24) It has been practiced as such by just about every culture across geographical locations and time. Marriage is a life-long commitment, and typically this involves a public ceremony (a wedding) where vows are exchanged to each other and before God. Approximately half of every traditional marriage in America ends in divorce

So all of you atheists who are married..either you have to believe in god or your marriage is null and void.

conserapedia Wrote:The unity between a man and a woman in marriage is an expression of the relationship that God desires to have with his creation. The first marriage occurred nearly 6,000 years ago in the Garden of Eden, in the area of the world that we now know as the Middle East. The first couple was Adam and Eve.

ummm...yeah...LMFAO..and adam and eve lived to be over a thousand years old, and talked to snakes that talked back..and played hide and seek with an all knowing god.

conservapedia Wrote:Any society which has lessened the sanctity of marriage has perished, whereas those that have upheld the sanctity of marriage have endured. Ancient Rome's decline and its eventual fall in A.D. 476 were due in no small part to a growing tolerance of extramarital sex, particularly homosexual acts, beginning in the Late Republic period ending in 27 B.C.

LMFAO..these people arent big on history.

If I did not know the people at Conservapedia were actually being serious. I would swear that whole site is a parody site like uncyclopedia is.

(May 7, 2011 at 11:11 pm)Atman Wrote: If I did not know the people at Conservapedia were actually being serious. I would swear that whole site is a parody site like uncyclopedia is.

Well, apparently, from what I've read, it's extremely difficult to tell which people on the Wiki are trolls and who are genuine contributors. About the only person who is certainly not a troll is Andy Schlafly, the Admin. For what it's worth, I actually made a reference to the situation on Conservapedia in a journal for my Shakespeare class, going so far as to liken his situation to King Lear, letting anybody who flatters him enough close to him, and banning anybody who tries to act reasonable with him.

(May 7, 2011 at 11:30 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(May 7, 2011 at 11:11 pm)Atman Wrote: If I did not know the people at Conservapedia were actually being serious. I would swear that whole site is a parody site like uncyclopedia is.

Well, apparently, from what I've read, it's extremely difficult to tell which people on the Wiki are trolls and who are genuine contributors. About the only person who is certainly not a troll is Andy Schlafly, the Admin. For what it's worth, I actually made a reference to the situation on Conservapedia in a journal for my Shakespeare class, going so far as to liken his situation to King Lear, letting anybody who flatters him enough close to him, and banning anybody who tries to act reasonable with him.

Well that would explain why they allow people like NephilimFree to become contributors and editors to articles on there.

Betty Bowers says that they are full of shit.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFkeKKszXTw

(May 7, 2011 at 11:30 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Well, apparently, from what I've read, it's extremely difficult to tell which people on the Wiki are trolls and who are genuine contributors. About the only person who is certainly not a troll is Andy Schlafly, the Admin. For what it's worth, I actually made a reference to the situation on Conservapedia in a journal for my Shakespeare class, going so far as to liken his situation to King Lear, letting anybody who flatters him enough close to him, and banning anybody who tries to act reasonable with him.

Then again, it is very difficult to put a finger on Andy Schlafly as well. His mother is a well known uber conservative, which makes me think that Andy is being DEAD serious..but there is a part of me that sometimes wonder if Andy himself is making fun of how stupid conservatives can be.

An entire website can easily be devoted to Andy and the stupid shit he has posted on the internet.

"Those bastards can mouth rinse the snotty end of my fuck root!"

LMFAO ...god, you slay me Rev!!

Also Min, that vid was so good I reposted it on another site. Nice post!

(May 8, 2011 at 1:17 am)Cinjin Cain Wrote: "Those bastards can mouth rinse the snotty end of my fuck root!"

LMFAO ...god, you slay me Rev!!

Also Min, that vid was so good I reposted it on another site. Nice post!

In Australian English, the term 'fuck root' is redundant,as both words have the same meaning. I think I'll stick with 'knob knocking mattress raper" or perhaps "those bastards are as useful as a cunt full of cold water"

Quote:I think I'll stick with 'knob knocking mattress raper" or perhaps "those bastards are as useful as a cunt full of cold water"

Those are good.

(May 8, 2011 at 12:02 am)reverendjeremiah Wrote:

(May 7, 2011 at 11:30 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote: Well, apparently, from what I've read, it's extremely difficult to tell which people on the Wiki are trolls and who are genuine contributors. About the only person who is certainly not a troll is Andy Schlafly, the Admin. For what it's worth, I actually made a reference to the situation on Conservapedia in a journal for my Shakespeare class, going so far as to liken his situation to King Lear, letting anybody who flatters him enough close to him, and banning anybody who tries to act reasonable with him.

Then again, it is very difficult to put a finger on Andy Schlafly as well. His mother is a well known uber conservative, which makes me think that Andy is being DEAD serious..but there is a part of me that sometimes wonder if Andy himself is making fun of how stupid conservatives can be.

An entire website can easily be devoted to Andy and the stupid shit he has posted on the internet.

There is.