Posts: 101
Threads: 13
Joined: August 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 1:40 am
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2016 at 9:44 am by robvalue.
Edit Reason: moderation
)
(August 13, 2016 at 1:32 am)Alex K Wrote: What is lower dimensional gravity?
It is the Einstein's theory, which is applied to spacetime with lower amount of space-dimensions. We have three basic coordinate directions: x,y,z. The lower dimensional General Relativity is having simply x,y or even only x. The time-axis t is added. More in
https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503024
Moderator Notice
Link restored as the staff have deemed it relevant to the discussion
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 1:45 am
Since no one knows for sure, we can use theistic logic to conclude anything we want about it.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am
(August 13, 2016 at 1:43 am)theBorg Wrote: (August 13, 2016 at 1:32 am)Alex K Wrote: What is lower dimensional gravity?
https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503024
Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 6896
Threads: 89
Joined: January 13, 2013
Reputation:
116
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 6:48 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2016 at 6:53 pm by Mystical.)
Here's the link the OP quoted if anyone wants to see it. It doesn't seem too pertinent to the conversation, but hey. I know I like my links too! 
https://youtu.be/RnolRWxoyOA
And here's the link he was trying to post to above: url=https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503024]https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503024
Moderator Notice
Please mrBorgman, copy what pertinent information you wish to share with the forum onto the post itself, until you've reached the 30/30 requisites! My fingers are getting tireds with all this moderation duties.. It's the most I've done in all year!
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)
Posts: 101
Threads: 13
Joined: August 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm
(August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote: (August 13, 2016 at 1:43 am)theBorg Wrote: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503024
Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions?
The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 17, 2016 at 12:51 am
(August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote: (August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote: Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions?
The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?
but it doesn't?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 101
Threads: 13
Joined: August 12, 2016
Reputation:
0
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 11:15 am
(August 17, 2016 at 12:51 am)Alex K Wrote: (August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote: The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?
but it doesn't? Who knows? But the Dark Matter, being not the matter, is very useful for Science.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 2:54 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2016 at 2:55 pm by Alex K.)
(August 19, 2016 at 11:15 am)theBorg Wrote: (August 17, 2016 at 12:51 am)Alex K Wrote: but it doesn't? Who knows? But the Dark Matter, being not the matter, is very useful for Science.
No it doesn't. General relativity doesn't have dark matter by itself. Black holes were a candidate but are now pretty unlikely to constitute the dark matter
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 2084
Threads: 7
Joined: August 14, 2016
Reputation:
10
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 3:02 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2016 at 3:09 pm by Arkilogue.)
I'm willing to bet we've already discovered dark matter in the 2 heavier quark types and the 3 anti-types found through particle collision....which rapidly evaporate or annihilate in our local space-time
Our local space-time/dimension patterns for the lightest type of matter quarks....so adding the 2 heavier types, plus their 3 anti-type = 6 total types, of which our is only one. 5 times more "dark matter" in the universe than our type. They are in other folds of space-time. 6 total. Same number that super string theory says must be folded up in our 3d space.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Posts: 23918
Threads: 300
Joined: June 25, 2011
Reputation:
151
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 3:11 pm
(August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote: (August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote: Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions?
The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?
I find "The fact is:" a very persuasive argument. I mean, who among us can argue with the facts? (Check mate, Alex.)
|
