Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2026, 5:07 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
#21
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
Reply
#22
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
Since no one knows for sure, we can use theistic logic to conclude anything we want about it.
Reply
#23
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#24
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!

Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.

Dead wrong.  The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.

Quote:Some people deserve hell.

I say again:  No exceptions.  Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it.  As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.

[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]
Reply
#25
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
(August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote:
(August 13, 2016 at 1:43 am)theBorg Wrote: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503024

Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions?

The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?
Reply
#26
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
(August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote:
(August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote: Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions?

The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?

but it doesn't?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#27
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
(August 17, 2016 at 12:51 am)Alex K Wrote:
(August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote: The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?

but it doesn't?
Who knows? But the Dark Matter, being not the matter, is very useful for Science.
Reply
#28
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
(August 19, 2016 at 11:15 am)theBorg Wrote:
(August 17, 2016 at 12:51 am)Alex K Wrote: but it doesn't?
Who knows? But the Dark Matter, being not the matter, is very useful for Science.

No it doesn't. General relativity doesn't have dark matter by itself. Black holes were a candidate but are now pretty unlikely to constitute the dark matter
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply
#29
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
I'm willing to bet we've already discovered dark matter in the 2 heavier quark types and the 3 anti-types found through particle collision....which rapidly evaporate or annihilate in our local space-time

Our local space-time/dimension patterns for the lightest type of matter quarks....so adding the 2 heavier types, plus their 3 anti-type = 6 total types, of which our is only one. 5 times more "dark matter" in the universe than our type. They are in other folds of space-time. 6 total. Same number that super string theory says must be folded up in our 3d space.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting,
I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder
Reply
#30
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
(August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote:
(August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote: Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions?

The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too?


I find "The fact is:" a very persuasive argument.  I mean, who among us can argue with the facts?  (Check mate, Alex.)
Reply



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dark matter vs. MOND LinuxGal 3 3019 August 23, 2023 at 8:07 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Rethinking Dark Matter/Dark energy.... Jackie 11 5632 January 26, 2018 at 7:50 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  "Super" Moon tonight! Jehanne 6 2268 December 4, 2017 at 12:36 am
Last Post: Sterben
  Are Photons the Particle Associatid with the CMB? Rhondazvous 5 2387 September 9, 2017 at 12:34 pm
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  Origin of Matter RedSox 50 28940 June 13, 2017 at 10:10 am
Last Post: Mister Agenda
  Anti-Matter at CERN chimp3 24 8203 December 21, 2016 at 7:12 am
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  First collisions at the LHC with unprecedented Energy! (Ask a particle physisicist) Alex K 385 125828 August 8, 2016 at 5:03 am
Last Post: Alex K
  A dark bulb ErGingerbreadMandude 29 8082 July 11, 2016 at 2:09 pm
Last Post: Jake Long
  Could this explian what Dark matter and Dark energy is? Blueyedlion 49 16521 June 13, 2016 at 10:28 am
Last Post: Jackalope
  Can you catch light in a pot? ErGingerbreadMandude 53 17905 June 3, 2016 at 11:56 pm
Last Post: ignoramus



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)