RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 1:40 am
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2016 at 9:44 am by robvalue.
Edit Reason: moderation
)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 3, 2026, 5:07 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
|
|
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 1:45 am
Since no one knows for sure, we can use theistic logic to conclude anything we want about it.
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 13, 2016 at 6:48 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2016 at 6:53 pm by Mystical.)
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite. Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment. Quote:Some people deserve hell. I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm
(August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote:(August 13, 2016 at 1:43 am)theBorg Wrote: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9503024 The fact is: the Einstein's theory is full of Dark Matter. So, perhaps, the Einstein's 3+1 Gravity has it too? RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 17, 2016 at 12:51 am
(August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote:(August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote: Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions? but it doesn't?
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 11:15 am
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 2:54 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2016 at 2:55 pm by Alex K.)
(August 19, 2016 at 11:15 am)theBorg Wrote:(August 17, 2016 at 12:51 am)Alex K Wrote: but it doesn't?Who knows? But the Dark Matter, being not the matter, is very useful for Science. No it doesn't. General relativity doesn't have dark matter by itself. Black holes were a candidate but are now pretty unlikely to constitute the dark matter
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 3:02 pm
(This post was last modified: August 19, 2016 at 3:09 pm by Arkilogue.)
I'm willing to bet we've already discovered dark matter in the 2 heavier quark types and the 3 anti-types found through particle collision....which rapidly evaporate or annihilate in our local space-time
Our local space-time/dimension patterns for the lightest type of matter quarks....so adding the 2 heavier types, plus their 3 anti-type = 6 total types, of which our is only one. 5 times more "dark matter" in the universe than our type. They are in other folds of space-time. 6 total. Same number that super string theory says must be folded up in our 3d space.
"Leave it to me to find a way to be,
Consider me a satellite forever orbiting, I knew the rules but the rules did not know me, guaranteed." - Eddie Vedder RE: Newest super-sensitive test failed to catch a Dark Matter particle. Why?
August 19, 2016 at 3:11 pm
(August 16, 2016 at 11:54 pm)theBorg Wrote:(August 13, 2016 at 4:52 am)Alex K Wrote: Oh, just that! But how does that help explain dark matter in 3+1 dimensions? I find "The fact is:" a very persuasive argument. I mean, who among us can argue with the facts? (Check mate, Alex.) |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)


