(September 10, 2016 at 8:08 pm)RozKek Wrote:

(September 10, 2016 at 7:24 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Hey Bennyboy, did you ever apologize to Stimbo for setting him up in that depression thread?  If you new he had just suffered a loss that was an extremely shitty thing to do.

How fucking dense are you, you fucking idiot? What the fuck does that have to do with this thread, and why do you bring a sensitive subject like that up in order to make someone else feel bad? I don't even want you to answer these questions nor reply to me but I want you to think about how fucking dumb and insensitive that question was. Just when I thought you had an ounce of intelligence.

Because he didn't answer me in the thread and it's quite pertinent to what happened. You think I'm insensitive for asking for clarification on being set up and roasted?...gee, I'm not real sorry. And yeah, if he did he should fucking feel bad. I've already apollogized twice to stimbo. I'm wondering if Mr Benny Sensitivity has.

I suppose 'ol Benny is brushing up on his sensitivity in calling me schizophrenic and drug addled? You're fucking hilarious RozKek.
This is the last I'll mention it, and you're more than welcome to fuck off out of things that don't concern you.

(September 10, 2016 at 8:24 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Because he didn't answer me in the thread and it's quite pertinent to what happened. You think I'm insensitive for asking for clarification on being set up and roasted?...gee, I'm not real sorry. And yeah, if he did he should fucking feel bad.  I've already apollogized twice to stimbo.  I'm wondering if Mr Benny Sensitivity has.

I suppose 'ol Benny is brushing up on his sensitivity in calling me schizophrenic and drug addled? You're fucking hilarious RozKek.
This is the last I'll mention it, and you're more than welcome to fuck off out of things that don't concern you.

You're a sad excuse for a human being you spoiled cunt, I'm done hijacking this thread to speak to a dense piece of shit, fuck off and bye 

@Arkilogue

I'm asking whether you're schizophrenic because your ideas show some of the false associations typical of schizophrenia, or of drug use. If you actually read what you said, I drew a parallel to one of the biggest geniuses I've ever known, and said that some of the connections you were making reminded me of the ones he made. And if you are insulted, consider reality: you've entered a Science thread with religious and made-up symbolism, and these are neither science nor related to it.

As for Stimbo-- I had no idea that anything I said had any negative effect on him. Stimbo is an AF legend and a generally great guy-- I'd never knowingly do anything to hurt him. But you calling me out in a Science thread in which you've rambled on about your incoherent ideas serves. . . what purpose? An ad hom attack against me showing that I'm such an insensitive guy, and THAT is the reason I immediately identified your ideas as word salad?

Nope. Your ideas are bad because they draw associations among things which are not usefully associated. So unless you want to talk some actual Science, then consider that you should post your ideas in a more appropriate section of the forums, or brace yourself for ongoing mockery. You can rant and rave a la SJW as much as you want, but I don't think it's going to do much to buttress your arguments about whether there's a multiverse.

(September 10, 2016 at 8:34 pm)bennyboy Wrote: I'm asking whether you're schizophrenic because your ideas show some of the false associations typical of schizophrenia, or of drug use.  If you actually read what you said, I drew a parallel to one of the biggest geniuses I've ever known, and said that some of the connections you were making reminded me of the ones he made.  And if you are insulted, consider reality: you've entered a Science thread with religious and made-up symbolism, and these are neither science nor related to it.

As for Stimbo-- I had no idea that anything I said had any negative effect on him.  Stimbo is an AF legend and a generally great guy-- I'd never knowingly do anything to hurt him.  But you calling me out in a Science thread in which you've rambled on about your incoherent ideas serves. . . what purpose?  An ad hom attack against me showing that I'm such an insensitive guy, and THAT is the reason I immediately identified your ideas as word salad?

Nope.  Your ideas are bad because they draw associations among things which are not usefully associated.  So unless you want to talk some actual Science, then consider that you should post your ideas in a more appropriate section of the forums, or brace yourself for ongoing mockery.

I expect ridicule and mockery, tons of it here, and find it stupidly hilarious that in the face of it I get called insensitive.

You still didn't answer the question, and I'm done here for today.

(September 10, 2016 at 8:47 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: I expect ridicule and mockery, tons of it here, and find it stupidly hilarious that in the face of it I get called insensitive.

You still didn't answer the question, and I'm done here for today.

I remember you asking me about Stimbo, and I remember answering you with something like "Dude, what the fuck are you even talking about?" If you think I said something especially grievous, then link to the original thread, say what pages I committed my offenses, and I'll comment. Just repeatedly asking about how I feel about what I supposedly did to someone doesn't really give enough context for me to bother commenting.

As for you being insensitive, I wouldn't expect you to be diplomatic, since I've been riding you this whole thread. I just want to encourage you to think more rationally, and less intuitively, because your intuitions are of little value to a science thread.

(September 10, 2016 at 9:09 pm)bennyboy Wrote:

(September 10, 2016 at 8:47 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: I expect ridicule and mockery, tons of it here, and find it stupidly hilarious that in the face of it I get called insensitive.

You still didn't answer the question, and I'm done here for today.

I remember you asking me about Stimbo, and I remember answering you with something like "Dude, what the fuck are you even talking about?"  If you think I said something especially grievous, then link to the original thread, say what pages I committed my offenses, and I'll comment.  Just repeatedly asking about how I feel about what I supposedly did to someone doesn't really give enough context for me to bother commenting.

As for you being insensitive, I wouldn't expect you to be diplomatic, since I've been riding you this whole thread.  I just want to encourage you to think more rationally, and less intuitively, because your intuitions are of little value to a science thread.

One more time. Did you know stimbo had just lost someone? Because in that thread we were talking about depression that does not respond to drugs and I was talking about how gut health affects overall well being with lots of medical references to back up the assertion, then you ask me out of the wild blue yonder how would I console a mother who had just lost a child, right in front of him. Unfortunately he plays into the hypothetical situation with personal pain, mixing the two and leading me to believe he was the mother who lost a child. I apologized to "her" in PM, to which I got no reply or clarification in thread.

So yeah, it looked to me like a set up. Like you both wanted to roast me and it backfired on him. It was only later that someone else let me know that "she" was a he and what his actual circumstances were.

(September 10, 2016 at 9:39 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: One more time. Did you know stimbo had just lost someone? Because in that thread we were talking about depression that does not respond to drugs and I was talking about how gut health affects overall well being with lots of medical references to back up the assertion, then you ask me out of the wild blue yonder how would I console a mother who had just lost a child, right in front of him.  Unfortunately he plays into the hypothetical situation with personal pain, mixing the two and leading me to believe he was the mother who lost a child.  I apologized to "her" in PM, to which I got no reply or clarification in thread.

So yeah, it looked to me like a set up. Like you both wanted to roast me and it backfired on him.  It was only later that someone else let me know that "she" was a he and what his actual circumstances were.

I'm not interested in your narrative of how it happened. I want you to link the actual content, so I can go back and look at what I said, what you said, and what Stimbo said.

But more important, I think the only really interesting thing to come out of this has been Alex K's playing with sounds, which I find VERY interesting, but which should be in a new and exciting thread of its own. You can PM me that link about Stimbo whenever you want, but until then, I feel we're pretty much at the point where we should:

/thread

Interconnected universes= "the universe".

There is no real chance of anything without the proper evidence to support it. There are probabilities, however, yet how many times has a probability become a reality?

Probably most of the time.