(September 11, 2016 at 2:58 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Hiccup

Either way, all Americans would have to be lobotomised, because neither one of them is good for the future of the USA.

(September 11, 2016 at 7:11 am)Tazzycorn Wrote:

(September 11, 2016 at 6:04 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No, it's bad politics. She's supposed to be smart enough to know better than to dig holes.

And giving Trump and his supporters a free pass on his ideology is? Demonising your opponents has had a long trend of success in politics, at least with Clinton if she's mischaracterising, islt's by downplaying Trump's tendencies.

I'm thinking that your first sentence suffers an evacuated middle, and your second doesn't make sense to me -- would you mind clarifying it?

(September 11, 2016 at 2:43 pm)RobertE Wrote:

(September 11, 2016 at 2:34 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Fuck your input, Robert.

Better like that.

I don't mind your input ... I just don't place much stock in it.

Sorry if that rustles your jimmies.

So, Hilary stated that Trump supporters are racist, homophobic etc...




So, there are no racists who support Clinton then?

(September 11, 2016 at 4:32 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(September 11, 2016 at 2:43 pm)RobertE Wrote: Better like that.

I don't mind your input ... I just don't place much stock in it.

Sorry if that rustles your jimmies.

My language is English, what is yours?

Why he speaks American, of course. God only knows what you did with the language after we left.

(September 11, 2016 at 4:35 pm)RobertE Wrote:

(September 11, 2016 at 4:32 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: I don't mind your input ... I just don't place much stock in it.

Sorry if that rustles your jimmies.

My language is English, what is yours?

I'd suggest you look up the words "colloquialism" and "slang" ... for all your vaunted education you seem remarkably ignorant of a basic concept in our language.

(September 11, 2016 at 6:04 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No, it's bad politics. She's supposed to be smart enough to know better than to dig holes.

No it's not.

Romney needed substantial support from the 47% if he were to win the election. Clinton doesn't depend on a single one of the basket of deplorables.

(September 11, 2016 at 2:42 pm)RobertE Wrote:

(September 11, 2016 at 2:34 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Thank goodness you aren't one of us, then.

You are simply a descendent of European immigrants that stole Native Indian peoples land. That makes them no different to those who did the same to Africa, Australia and South America.

And you are just a descendant of immigrants who stole Neanderthal lands. Don't act like you are any different, or like we are responsible for the actions of people long dead.

(September 11, 2016 at 6:25 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(September 11, 2016 at 6:04 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No, it's bad politics. She's supposed to be smart enough to know better than to dig holes.

No it's not.

Romney needed substantial support from the 47% if he were to win the election. Clinton doesn't depend on a single one of the basket of deplorables.

Perhaps you're right ... but I always thought it bad to go after your opponent's followers rather than your opponent directly, it hampers one's ability to peel votes. With the polling as close as it is right now, it's not smart.