(October 6, 2016 at 11:05 am)Whateverist Wrote:

(October 5, 2016 at 9:38 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: God is pure and absolute self existence.

Interesting sentence construction.  Let me try one.


"Zog is authentic and essential autodidactic knowledge."


How'd I do?

You give me the impression that "Zog" is the title on the journal/log of a lone scientist, long dead but his works are upheld and authenticated by consensus in the scientific community.

It gives me the impression that Zog might also be the name of the author but is most likely a book title, given your last word "knowledge".

(October 6, 2016 at 1:17 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:

(October 6, 2016 at 10:27 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Wait. He had a mouth but no colon?

"Is like"....is like, is like, is like...

There is nothing being consumed, everything in the "mouth" is a standing wave expression. But the mouth expresses the Word and the word is "God." The universe is a developing self expression. They all are a self expression from the same being.


If you prefer anthropomorphism that includes a butt-hole, I'm sure I can make one for you.

Then why use the "mouth" analogy?

(October 6, 2016 at 1:18 pm)LastPoet Wrote: So, in essence, the metagaboggles entangled a couple of rayons to make up for the sandwiggles in the ultraverses.

Got it.

No, through vibration (quantum fluctuation) that causes cavitation (look up acoustic cavitation) the infinite unified state is spread apart by it's own relativistic spatial relationships...

...which are: All around itself equally in all directions, at the center of itself everywhere, throughout itself equally as a field in equilibrium. This quantizes into a sphere/central point/field simultaneously arising structure as a finite container of voided space. Those are the vibrational borders of the universe. It patterns directly for atomic anatomy and behavior. Atoms are the universes internal standing wave.

Is there any way to falsify any of this?

(October 6, 2016 at 1:27 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:

(October 6, 2016 at 1:17 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: "Is like"....is like, is like, is like...

There is nothing being consumed, everything in the "mouth" is a standing wave expression. But the mouth expresses the Word and the word is "God." The universe is a developing self expression. They all are a self expression from the same being.


If you prefer anthropomorphism that includes a butt-hole, I'm sure I can make one for you.

Then why use the "mouth" analogy?

Because the universe is an expression of God.

And while we are asking, why does Amun-Ra translate as Hidden Mouth and why is Ra's symbol a circle around a dot? Why did Sri Krishna show his mother the inside of his mouth which contained the entire universe?

(October 6, 2016 at 10:51 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote:

(October 6, 2016 at 3:54 am)robvalue Wrote: (Before a religious person jumps all over me for making statements of fact I can't back up, let me say this. I'm talking informally. I'm not in science/formal logic mode all the time.

When I say "X didn't happen", what I actually mean is, "There is absolutely no credible evidence to support event X happening, and plenty of reason to think it didn't happen, including simple explanations that require no assumptions which are extremely more likely than this outlandish claim". My sentences would get a bit long if I went into such detail all the time. The argument from ignorance is popular, and it is really stupid. The time I take claims which clash with reality seriously is the point at which evidence is presented. I'm happy to look at it. But anecdotes are not credible evidence of anything beyond the mundane.)

So basically you don't need to support your argument (it is assumed to be true) until it is proven false then?

Also, I may need to start a thread where someone can support this claim, that anecdotes are not credible evidence for things beyond the mundane. I'm still fuzzy on the reasoning behind this principle.

That's not what he is saying at ALL, and you know it.

About the anecdotes thread...PLEASE do.

(October 6, 2016 at 1:43 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Is there any way to falsify any of this?

You can falsify it's predictions, but there is no physical way to observe out side the universe nor even outside our local section of the universe.

And here is what I found on the conundrum from the physics department of Oregon U. http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast123/lectures/lec17.html

Physics of the early Universe is at the boundary of astronomy and philosophy since we do not currently have a complete theory that unifies all the fundamental forces of Nature at the moment of Creation. In addition, there is no possibility of linking observation or experimentation of early Universe physics to our theories (i.e. it's not possible to `build' another Universe). Our theories are rejected or accepted based on simplicity and aesthetic grounds, plus their power of prediction to later times, rather than an appeal to empirical results. This is a very difference way of doing science from previous centuries of research.

(October 6, 2016 at 1:45 pm)Arkilogue Wrote:

(October 6, 2016 at 1:27 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Then why use the "mouth" analogy?

Because the universe is an expression of God.

And while we are asking, why does Amun-Ra translate as Hidden Mouth and why is Ra's symbol a circle around a dot? Why did Sri Krishna show his mother the inside of his mouth which contained the entire universe?

I say the universe is an expression of just-so-ness.  What does calling it the actual God add to anything?

(October 5, 2016 at 9:00 pm)chimp3 Wrote:

(October 5, 2016 at 2:03 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: It is not a new idea and pure matter (taking up 100% of space) is more metastable than atomic matter which only take up 0.0000000001% of the space of the atom. Pure matter is like a lake of all consuming fire to atomic matter.

Last Poets response to your previous comment was to sign language you are a loon. My comment to your response to Last Poets accusation is that you practice dumbfuckery at an epic level.

What the exact fuck is your problem Chump? I could list many scientific links supporting my above claim that quark matter is more metastable than atomic matter and will consume it, but you've shat on the game board enough.

(October 6, 2016 at 1:53 pm)Whateverist Wrote:

(October 6, 2016 at 1:45 pm)Arkilogue Wrote: Because the universe is an expression of God.

And while we are asking, why does Amun-Ra translate as Hidden Mouth and why is Ra's symbol a circle around a dot? Why did Sri Krishna show his mother the inside of his mouth which contained the entire universe?

I say the universe is an expression of just-so-ness.  What does calling it the actual God add to anything?

Does that give you a logical, predictive model of universal phenomenon we could check against actual universal phenomenon?