christian school project

[Ben Davis]

I mean it spatially as infinite pure matter filling all available space.  There is no empty space, the is no where it is not. This is before the inflation of empty (voided) space aka "creation".

So your 'god' is the state of the universe before the expansion? Then why call it 'god'?

[Firefighter01]

Those are supposed "qualities"  and you still haven't defined God.

God is pure and absolute self existence.

You are not telling me anything here, you may have well said, "God is nice." Or "God never says shit".  I'm asking you, what the fuck is God? An alien?  A really big turtle that spans the universe? A Robot? That's the problem with Christians, they don't really know what the Hell they are worshipping.  They hide behind the God is Love, God is Pure bullshit.

Do you want the correct answer?  Maybe the school kid or what I believe to be a troll wants to have a dig first?

[robvalue]

My question is always this:

I have two entities. One is a god, and one is an arbitrarily powerful non-God. How do I tell the difference?

[LastPoet]

The latter may exist, the former is imaginary?

[Crossless2.0]

God is pure and absolute self existence.

Pro tip: This sort of vacuous bullshit seems much more impressive if you can dress it up in German philosophical jargon.

[brewer]

Yeah, but did he have a clean colon?

He had no colon.  There is no void-space in the body of God.  But the inflation of a universe is like the opening of God's mouth.  I seem to remember a ceremony...

Wait. He had a mouth but no colon?

[RoadRunner79]

(Before a religious person jumps all over me for making statements of fact I can't back up, let me say this. I'm talking informally. I'm not in science/formal logic mode all the time.

When I say "X didn't happen", what I actually mean is, "There is absolutely no credible evidence to support event X happening, and plenty of reason to think it didn't happen, including simple explanations that require no assumptions which are extremely more likely than this outlandish claim". My sentences would get a bit long if I went into such detail all the time. The argument from ignorance is popular, and it is really stupid. The time I take claims which clash with reality seriously is the point at which evidence is presented. I'm happy to look at it. But anecdotes are not credible evidence of anything beyond the mundane.)

So basically you don't need to support your argument (it is assumed to be true) until it is proven false then?

Also, I may need to start a thread where someone can support this claim, that anecdotes are not credible evidence for things beyond the mundane. I'm still fuzzy on the reasoning behind this principle.

[Whateverist]

Those are supposed "qualities"  and you still haven't defined God.

God is pure and absolute self existence.

Interesting sentence construction.  Let me try one.


"Zog is authentic and essential autodidactic knowledge."


How'd I do?

[Whateverist]

Yeah, but did he have a clean colon?

He had no colon.  There is no void-space in the body of God.  But the inflation of a universe is like the opening of God's mouth.  I seem to remember a ceremony...

Can you prove that Zog as the most mighty doesn't create the universe one galaxy at a time by way of a deist bowel movement?

[Whateverist]

I have read a page or two at the beginning and some last pages.
Should I go through all 24 pages, and read all posts in detail?
---
This lighthouse, will she come back to tell us how her work was graded?

I think she said she is a new convert and Jesus changed her life.... was she like a junkie?

I doubt it.  Portraying yourself as having formerly been a really fucked up person before you found the lord is pretty standard fare amongst apologists.  Keep in mind that they imagine we are all running amuck in sin and fallenness.  If she failed to include such a detail I'm sure her project would receive a lower grade.