dblpst

dblpst

(October 14, 2016 at 7:43 am)Soldat Du Christ Wrote: @pocaracas
"I take it you agree with everything else I wrote, then..."

Mmmm... There was alot of unnecary filler that all ammounted to the same point(s) so i found it irrelevent. Then there was the obvious contradiction so i kind of discredited the rest anyways..

I'm wondering what kinds of marks you received in reading comprehension and whether you have a reputation for applying yourself.  Not all of us are grammar nazis but few of us will forgive sloth in the service of willful ignorance.

Yeah yeah it was a typo, still getting used to my phone key board and it wouldn't let me edit so i said f it! That being said, i've already laid out a disclaimer that i'm not the most litterate.

(October 13, 2016 at 9:52 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote:

Quote:"Nope.  A collection of subjective experiences, no matter how large the population, is not sufficient to establish objective Truth."

Even the context of your response was built off of the presupposition that what your saying IS in fact true! I mean do i even have to elaborate how absurd this is?

Okay, you are arguing there is objective truth. We are subjective beings. How do YOU propose that we establish that anything is objectively true, beyond the context of what we can see and touch? Put on our thinkin' caps, and figure it out? Good luck with that.

(October 14, 2016 at 1:35 pm)Soldat Du Christ Wrote:

(October 14, 2016 at 1:33 pm)Whateverist Wrote: This quote nicely illustrates the fact that all of us here agree upon (who are not arguing for the existence of faeries) that mathematics is an invention.  We choose to make it square with what we observe empirically; but when it gets messy we just choose to make it serviceable.  Nice work, math guys (and dolls).

Nope.

Hmmmm .. hadn't looked at it that way. Nice argument and eloquently made.