(October 19, 2016 at 11:02 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:  Why are you playing dumb?

Do you really think it's an act?

Honestly I wish we'd use the nuclear option to send Drich on his way. I don't think anyone appreciates hearing from him and some of us don't like what he brings out in us.

With God'sChild I always felt like there was some warmth and humanity there even though his responses became pretty predictable and of little interest to anyone here. I don't think he was toxic at all.

Does anyone at all like the topics, discussion or presence of Drich? If not, how would we activate the nuclear option for the first time?

(October 19, 2016 at 12:11 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 12:58 pm)Drich Wrote: korean or rather 1/2..

The point was to frame the western view on sex and the woman's role in sex to be a co-equal partner is in the minority of how people generally view sex world wide.

That how members of this website would be in the minority (when view through a global lens) on how women participate in sex.

Yeah?  And what is your opinion on that?!  I was like...so close to giving you a SHRED a credit in this discussion, but if you are about to turn around and say that our western view of women having co-equal rights as participants in sex is somehow "incorrect" because from a global perspective it's the minority opinion, then I am officially done engaging with you.  Ever again.

LFC, see my post (#366) in which I give FatAndFaithless some tongue-in-cheek ribbing about being a bigot. Two people gave it kudos, but I think only one understood that I wasn't serious. I'll give you one guess who didn't. Of course, that kudos might not be there by the time you look.

Lol.

(October 19, 2016 at 12:11 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(October 18, 2016 at 12:58 pm)Drich Wrote: korean or rather 1/2..

The point was to frame the western view on sex and the woman's role in sex to be a co-equal partner is in the minority of how people generally view sex world wide.

That how members of this website would be in the minority (when view through a global lens) on how women participate in sex.

Yeah?  And what is your opinion on that?!  I was like...so close to giving you a SHRED a credit in this discussion, but if you are about to turn around and say that our western view of women having co-equal rights as participants in sex is somehow "incorrect" because from a global perspective it's the minority opinion, then I am officially done engaging with you.  Ever again.

He says if you assume it's immoral for women to not be co-equal partners in sex just because it's different from your culture means you're a bigot.

(October 19, 2016 at 12:33 pm)Losty Wrote:

(October 19, 2016 at 12:11 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Yeah?  And what is your opinion on that?!  I was like...so close to giving you a SHRED a credit in this discussion, but if you are about to turn around and say that our western view of women having co-equal rights as participants in sex is somehow "incorrect" because from a global perspective it's the minority opinion, then I am officially done engaging with you.  Ever again.

He says if you assume it's immoral for women to not be co-equal partners in sex just because it's different from your culture means you're a bigot.

Yeah, it's pretty much the same argument he makes when he excuses all of the horrible shit in the Bible.

(October 19, 2016 at 12:31 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Honestly I wish we'd use the nuclear option to send Drich on his way.  I don't think anyone appreciates hearing from him and some of us don't like what he brings out in us.  

With God'sChild I always felt like there was some warmth and humanity there even though his responses became pretty predictable and of little interest to anyone here.  I don't think he was toxic at all.

Does anyone at all like the topics, discussion or presence of Drich?  If not, how would we activate the nuclear option for the first time?

The purpose of the rule is not to off the people we don't like.

(October 19, 2016 at 12:31 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Honestly I wish we'd use the nuclear option to send Drich on his way.  I don't think anyone appreciates hearing from him and some of us don't like what he brings out in us.  

With God'sChild I always felt like there was some warmth and humanity there even though his responses became pretty predictable and of little interest to anyone here.  I don't think he was toxic at all.

Does anyone at all like the topics, discussion or presence of Drich?  If not, how would we activate the nuclear option for the first time?

I'm obviously not a moderator, but that's a slippery slope there. Drich and his opinions are absolutely vile but I thought AF was all about freedom of speech.

(October 19, 2016 at 12:36 pm)Losty Wrote:

(October 19, 2016 at 12:31 pm)Whateverist Wrote: Honestly I wish we'd use the nuclear option to send Drich on his way.  I don't think anyone appreciates hearing from him and some of us don't like what he brings out in us.  

With God'sChild I always felt like there was some warmth and humanity there even though his responses became pretty predictable and of little interest to anyone here.  I don't think he was toxic at all.

Does anyone at all like the topics, discussion or presence of Drich?  If not, how would we activate the nuclear option for the first time?

The purpose of the rule is not to off the people we don't like.

Besides, he's a never-ending source of reasons not to adopt his brand of Christianity. Think of the lurkers. Think of the children! If he didn't exist, we'd have had to invent him.

Fine .. fine .. rain on my hopes.  Guess a guy just can't dream big anymore.

(October 19, 2016 at 11:06 am)Shell B Wrote: I'm considering we play a game called "don't respond to Drich," wherein none of us respond to Drich and he stops posting paragraph after paragraph of responses that aren't responses.

I like the idea that a one-line reply of mine might set off an 800-word calvacade which can be further used to demonstrate the sheer ugliness of his character.

Not just giving him enough rope -- we get to watch him build the scaffold and tie the noose, whistling as he goes about his task with diligence.

(October 19, 2016 at 11:57 am)Drich Wrote: Sad funny indeed.

The truth is unless you are a stump intellectually, we all learn something from one another given enough time.

I simply proactively push the topics and thoughts I want out there.

The thing is, you are a goddamned stump, intellectually. A tree-trimmer has come in and taken a chainsaw to the trunk of your mind, and all you seem to have to offer is a rotten core made worse for sitting exposed to the weather of life.