Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 13, 2024, 8:42 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 4 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:38 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: So you observe probable gods but disbelieve that you actually see such things? Makes perfect sense.

Exemplification:

Whether or not one BELIEVES in science is rather irrelevant, for science OBTAINS, regardless of one's decision to select belief in such.

Therein, BELIEF is an irrelevant quantity.

One need NOT belief, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

(November 6, 2016 at 7:41 am)mh.brewer Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:35 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Fulfill the facing exercise:

Identify ONE opinionated stipulation of mine.

No. 

I don't do face exercises, other than eat and blink. I used to wiggle my ears but pulled a muscle.
Such is quite the theistic mannerism...
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:42 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:38 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: So you observe probable gods but disbelieve that you actually see such things? Makes perfect sense.

Exemplification:

Whether or not one BELIEVES in science is rather irrelevant, for science OBTAINS, regardless of one's decision to select belief in such.

Therein, BELIEF is an irrelevant quantity.

One need NOT belief, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

Stop right there. What did I JUST say?
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:40 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:37 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Are you of theistic descent?

Why yes. Because I have redefined "God" to mean "dude who types in far too much large colored text on atheistforums.org".

You needn't redifine God.

A particular theistic god property (as encoded in the original post) is likely amidst mortals. 

Therein, God is therein redifinable as such.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:42 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:38 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: So you observe probable gods but disbelieve that you actually see such things? Makes perfect sense.

Exemplification:

Whether or not one BELIEVES in science is rather irrelevant, for science OBTAINS, regardless of one's decision to select belief in such.

Therein, BELIEF is an irrelevant quantity.

One need NOT belief, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

(November 6, 2016 at 7:41 am)mh.brewer Wrote: No. 

I don't do face exercises, other than eat and blink. I used to wiggle my ears but pulled a muscle.
Such is quite the theistic mannerism...

Ouch.

So, tell me. What is it that you appear to be over compensating for?
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental. 
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:48 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:42 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Exemplification:

Whether or not one BELIEVES in science is rather irrelevant, for science OBTAINS, regardless of one's decision to select belief in such.

Therein, BELIEF is an irrelevant quantity.

One need NOT belief, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

Stop right there. What did I JUST say?
Precisely, you express nonsense.

YOUR FAILURE:
You fail to recognize that one need NOT BELIEF, such that one OBSERVES a sequence's VIABILITY.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:52 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: One needs not BELIEF in the OBSERVATION of PROBABILITIES.


Quote:Specify such a contradiction.


PROBABLY.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:51 am)mh.brewer Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:42 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Exemplification:

Whether or not one BELIEVES in science is rather irrelevant, for science OBTAINS, regardless of one's decision to select belief in such.

Therein, BELIEF is an irrelevant quantity.

One need NOT belief, such that one OBSERVES PROBABILITIES.

Such is quite the theistic mannerism...

Ouch.

So, tell me. What is it that you appear to be over compensating for?
It is rather non fortunate, that I am but non omniscient.

I thereafter, in a hobyyist fashion, research such that artificial human exceeding intelligence is logically hypothesized/encoded...

(See 'THOUGHT CURVATURE')

(November 6, 2016 at 7:59 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:52 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Precisely, you express nonsense.

YOUR FAILURE:
You fail to recognize that one need NOT BELIEF, such that one OBSERVES a sequence's VIABILITY.

PROBABLY.

Your failure is but CERTAIN.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 7:59 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:59 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: PROBABLY.

Your failure is but CERTAIN.

Probability, you imbecile.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
ProgrammingGod, still, all you have is only probabilities. Any probability is possible, the question is, which you wanna bet on.
Reply
RE: Scientific evidence of God by an atheist (Where mankind is one likely type of God)
(November 6, 2016 at 8:05 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote:
(November 6, 2016 at 7:59 am)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:

Your failure is but CERTAIN.

Probability, you imbecile.

Rather than LIKELY, it is trivially observable that your failure is but CERTAIN.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Proof and evidence will always equal Science zwanzig 103 9903 December 17, 2021 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Young more likely to pray than over-55s - survey zebo-the-fat 16 2136 September 28, 2021 at 5:44 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Is God weaker than theists imagine, and is mankind stronger? invalid 6 2629 March 5, 2021 at 6:38 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Are miracles evidence of the existence of God? ido 74 6681 July 24, 2020 at 12:59 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Muslim students less likely to be awarded top class degrees. Succubus#2 28 3126 March 22, 2020 at 6:02 am
Last Post: Belacqua
  Religious fundamentalists more likely to believe fake news OakTree500 30 4786 November 10, 2018 at 4:32 pm
Last Post: no one
  If theists understood "evidence" Silver 135 16891 October 10, 2018 at 10:50 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Moses parting the sea evidence or just made up Smain 12 3382 June 28, 2018 at 1:38 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Are introverts less likely to like organised religion? Der/die AtheistIn 8 1580 March 22, 2018 at 11:13 pm
Last Post: GODZILLA
  Can religion be a type of Stockholm syndrome? ignoramus 5 2978 June 10, 2017 at 9:54 am
Last Post: Cyberman



Users browsing this thread: 75 Guest(s)