(December 30, 2016 at 1:52 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: In exemplification, prove the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.

Say wha?

(December 30, 2016 at 2:09 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(December 30, 2016 at 1:52 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: In exemplification, prove the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.

Say wha?

It does not... compute?

(December 30, 2016 at 2:09 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:

(December 30, 2016 at 1:52 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: In exemplification, prove the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.

Say wha?

(1)

I had edited my prior stipulation, via user 'Jörmungandr'.

PRIOR: In exemplification, prove the presence....

SUBSEQUENT: In exemplification, prove scientifically, the presence ....


.
.
.
.
.

(2)

Indeed.
It is pertinent that you garner scientific proof, regarding the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.

.

Separately, what is your native language? 
It appears that you are unable to parse simplistic strings of English .

(December 30, 2016 at 2:16 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:

(December 30, 2016 at 2:09 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Say wha?

Indeed.
It is pertinent that you garner scientific proof, regarding the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.


.
.

Separately, what is your native language? 
It appears that you are unable to parse simplistic strings of English .

There is no way you're dense enough to miss the irony in that last sentence.

(December 30, 2016 at 2:20 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(December 30, 2016 at 2:16 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Indeed.
It is pertinent that you garner scientific proof, regarding the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.


.
.

Separately, what is your native language? 
It appears that you are unable to parse simplistic strings of English .

There is no way you're dense enough to miss the irony in that last sentence.

What irony?

(December 30, 2016 at 2:21 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:

(December 30, 2016 at 2:20 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: There is no way you're dense enough to miss the irony in that last sentence.

What irony?

I was wrong.

(December 30, 2016 at 2:22 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:

(December 30, 2016 at 2:21 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: What irony?

I was wrong.

Indeed.

Talk about reading comprehension..

(December 30, 2016 at 2:23 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Talk about reading comprehension..

Have you any sensible stipulations? (beyond nonsense?)

(December 30, 2016 at 2:08 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:

(December 30, 2016 at 2:02 pm)purplepurpose Wrote: ProgrammingGodJordan, do you find an absolutely rational worldview, where emotions are suppressed to the max at all time as a way you wish to live your life? Do you enjoy life at all or you see it as a waste of time, which hinders your development?

(1)

I had edited my prior stipulation, via user 'Jörmungandr'.

PRIOR: In exemplification, describe any non-scientific sequence amidst my initial stipulation.

SUBSEQUENT: In exemplification, prove scientifically, the presence of a single non-scientific sequence amidst the stipulation of that of the being you presume to express nonsense.

.
.
.

(2)

(a)
It is likely that life's meaning arises amidst thermodynamics: http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/mit-physici...ng-of-life

(b)
SEPARATELY, life perhaps exists, such that matter shall manifest as some disparate time-space complex optimal fabric, on the order of algorithmic analysis: https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-meanin...-Bennett-9

If you think that your so "advanced", that you can use style of language, that I and majority of people here cannot even understand how to translate, then you shouldn't even post here in the first place.