First you'd have to demonstrate that there was a flood.

I'd settle for the precursor of dogs ( wolves) with a T-Rex but you can't come up with that either.

(June 29, 2011 at 7:51 pm)Minimalist Wrote: I'd settle for the precursor of dogs ( wolves) with a T-Rex but you can't come up with that either.

Nor would I expect to, the creation model does not predict T rex and wolf fossils to be found side by side.

Which creation model, there are so many, depending on the requirements of the creationist at any given time.

(June 29, 2011 at 8:04 pm)DaveD Wrote: Which creation model, there are so many, depending on the requirements of the creationist at any given time.

There are probably even more evolutionary models, but there is a general theory that the majority of evolutionists ascribe to just like there is a current creation model that the majority of creationists ascribe to.

Round and round we go ...

(June 29, 2011 at 8:33 pm)Epimethean Wrote: Round and round we go ...

Not my fault, you guys keep trying to refute things that creationists do not even believe. Then when I point this out you guys always ask what the current model is. The next day you refute something that creationists do not believe, so I point it out again.....and it just keeps going.....the only way to stop it is to actually try and argue against what creationists believe right?

There is zero evidence for creation (of an exclusive sort which creationists have not recently borrowed from science in order to finance their bankrupt model). There was no flood. There was no exodus.

(June 29, 2011 at 8:56 pm)Epimethean Wrote: There is zero evidence for creation (of an exclusive sort which creationists have not recently borrowed from science in order to finance their bankrupt model). There was no flood. There was no exodus.

More assertions I see. Not so sure you are qualified to make such a statement though considering you have proven time and time again you are not familiar with the current creation model, so thereofre you also have to be unfamiliar with the evidence it is built upon.

Now's your chance then. Present the evidence...........

Every time someone asks you for the "current" creation model (which still and ludicrously posits the earth's age at less than 10,000 years), you do a song and dance. WHAT current creation model? Whose?