And you have devolved again.

Therefore, there is no further reason to further respond.

(May 26, 2017 at 9:49 pm)ComradeMeow Wrote: I despise atheist like you for showing anger at something non existent. I only said a mere snippet of my beliefs so they would not be taken as something wholly important. Also you are talking to a guy with enough scholarships to make your head spin, if the current education is this lacking in its ability to teach critical thinking and mandate wider philosophical practices then I am very worried. 

. . . I would just assume that you are uneducated though.

As for my statement about homosexuality. It is not productive evolutionary nor is a union of homosexual pairs a norm, especially in primates. You do not see any animal on earth using hierarchy to legitimize mating or sexual pairs yet so many atheist think a National Daddy needs to give them permission. That is all I am stating and that alone gives you enough fire to make an idiot out of yourself. 

Please fuck off you ignorant sack of shit.

bold mine

Scholarships to where? Where did you graduate from? When and with what degrees? You made the claim. 

Why do you care if it is not evolutionary productive? I thought people who apparently think like you would be happy it is not. 

National Daddy (assume you mean state/federal/national government) does not need to give permission. However, because of people that apparently think like you, Daddy needs to provide certain protections and enforcement of equal rights under the law. 

You keep this up and the only conclusion I'll be able to come to is that "thou dost protest too much". Do you understand what "in the closet" means? Or "homosexual panic/gay panic defense"? Might explain the sadist comment you previously made.

Edit: BTW, diagnosis change as medical science evolves and that includes within a culture/society.

Lots of things are evolutionary productive . Hell sitting here writing this post does not serve evolutionary production . That no more makes it irrational nor morally wrong. So why don't you be evolutionary productive and fuck off.

If every member of a species were "straight" and all of them continuously reproduced, that would not be evolutionary productive. They would reproduce themselves into extinction.
So if some of the straight members of a species don't reproduce, what difference would it make then if they were gay instead? Same results as far as I can see.

Ho hum. Another theist claiming to be an atheist. And "enough scholarships to make your head spin"? Maybe it is a language problem, but scholarships don't make one educated, unless they are used.

Give it time, OP, and you'll find that not all of us atheists think or do alike. I don't even think of atheism as being a group or a particular identity. For me, it's just a lack of belief in god, that's all. There's no atheist leader or overlord telling us how to think or behave. Thank goodness for that.

I'm guessing you haven't encountered many atheists in real life, only on the web. Believe it or not, we're actually complex human beings like you. Beware of painting people with broad brush generalizations.

-Teresa

From your own study ass clown

Quote:Overall, homosexuality and the paraphilias appear to share the features of onset and course (both homosexuality and paraphilia being life-long), but they appear to differ on sex ratio, fraternal birth order, handedness, IQ and cognitive profile, and neuroanatomy. Although there have been some reports on prevalence and on physical height, these literatures are not yet reliable enough to be informative. Thus, considered together, the existing data seem more consistent with the conclusion that homosexuality is a characteristic distinct from the paraphilias.

So much "scholarship" you can't even read a fucking study you linked . And honestly spin the conservatard myth about the APA and people who's shoes your smart enough to shine let alone start talking shit about. NOW GET THE FUCK OFF OUR FORUM

I made a good point though

(May 27, 2017 at 2:30 am)Alex K Wrote:

Comrade meow have you ever heard of Mrs Kruger and Dunning. They would have much to say of your take on Atheism.