Jack manley TV? Lel. Dude could be my son, for the exception, I would raise him to be a man, work for a living, not making video pranks.

"Hey, princess, put your little media toys down and help me dig this hole. Don't worry, you'll have all the sweet brown ass touching you that you could handle when you become a real man."

Also, tell you this. If I was the bf of that girl or husband, the cops would be the least of his concerns. I am kinda hurt on my right hand shoulder, but my left hand makes a nice collar for that boy, if I squeezed just enough.

Not as good as you once were..but as good once as you ever was? I feel the same way, obviously there was something missing in that kids upbringing, he's not doing it right. He had a shot there, halfway through the video where she was visibly considering going home with him..and he totally fucked it up by being a A Idiot. I'd consider a solid check a valuable mentoring service.

(June 22, 2017 at 12:07 pm)LastPoet Wrote: Also, tell you this. If I was the bf of that girl or husband, the cops would be the least of his concerns. I am kinda hurt on my right hand shoulder, but my left hand makes a nice collar for that boy, if I squeezed just enough.

Naw, just ruin his vid by questioning his manhood, his intelligence and insert intimations of his proclivity for really liking small children.

Why are people defending the chicks? They were assaulting and harassing the guy. If it was the other way around and the guy was slapping the girls...

(June 22, 2017 at 12:02 pm)LastPoet Wrote: Jack manley TV? Lel. Dude could be my son, for the exception, I would raise him to be a man, work for a living, not making video pranks.

Wait wait wait wait you know that guy???? omaigad

Technically, he was harrassing them...and not all contact is assault -she was clearly flirting and he was vocally and visibly receptive.   Street corner cameras in your face on a night out belligerance -is- harassment.  Even a reporter or a protestor, actually covered by some rights in similar situations (in this country), still has to follow some rules.

None of this "defends the chicks" - who, if all I had to go on was this video are pretty dense and fairly drunk. It simply undercuts the obvious "boohoo men are being repressed for hurting womens fee-fees" narrative...which they aren't. The cop actually asks her if she was offended and she says "yes" but he doesn't get charged with the crime of "offending a random club goer in possession of a vagina"...which probably should have been your first clue that the op's assessment was both silly, and completely expected from his usual suspecty self. He was momentarily detained for being a nuisance on what was most likely private property.

Who wants that asshole outside their establishment, costing them business? Who has to put up with it? No one, to both.

In this country, and probably where ever that was too (haven't checked), had some feminazi been sitting outside castigating patrons, they too would be removed from the premises.

Nah, I don't think they said "take your cameras out of here" or anything they were participating without any problem.

(June 22, 2017 at 12:48 pm)FFaith Wrote: Why are people defending the chicks? They were assaulting and harassing the guy. If it was the other way around and the guy was slapping the girls...

Who defended them?