Dude, she literally a-ha'd something I didn't edit out. It was in the edited post. Seriously, are you guys really this stupid? No, for real. Also, don't insinuate shit about staff motives, particularly my husband. I'm married to him, not his boss. Its laughable how much people think they know. Maybe the edited it because it was against the rules. Beats the shit out of me.

(July 12, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Shell B Wrote: I didn't "have" anyone's post edited, you sanctimonious piece of garbage. That's not how this forum works. Also, think harder. Poe's law? You can't really think that's what I meant.

What the hell did you mean by "Poe" then? It has a clear meaning online. Be specific in your answer. If you weren't referring to Poe's Law, what were you referring to? And if you didn't have her post edited, did you edit it yourself?

As for sanctimony, I'm very well aware of my own failings. I'm not preaching to you anything, except know the limits of your own knowledge and act inside them. This will clearly be a hard lesson for you.

I don't think I'm better than you, but I do think I've learnt a little more about how to listen to disagreement. While I'm not "garbage", and while I haven't called you a single name that you haven't slung yourself at others.

Methinks the doctor doesn't like the taste of her own medicine. Maybe next time you think before posting ... but to be honest, I'm not optimistic.

I haven't seen Tibs on here in sooooo long, but suddenly he appears?

(July 12, 2017 at 11:40 pm)Shell B Wrote: Dude, she literally a-ha'd something I didn't edit out. It was in the edited post. Seriously, are you guys really this stupid? No, for real. Also, don't insinuate shit about staff motives, particularly my husband. I'm married to him, not his boss. Its laughable how much people think they know. Maybe the edited it because it was against the rules. Beats the shit out of me.

Gee, I wonder who reported it?

(July 12, 2017 at 11:35 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:

(July 12, 2017 at 11:25 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:

Moderator Notice
Any user has the right to edit their posts for two hours, that is why the function exists. All post iterations, every edit, are always on the record.

To be clear---we consider posting properly edited content to be quoting inaccurately, especially when done to try to 'out' someone for content that they fixed or changed on purpose. That is why the post was snipped. We don't take editing any user's posts lightly.

I'm thinking that the original post speaks something to the poster's mindset. I also think that "Mrs Tibs" having such a thing done is horseshit. The original post was caught on the fly, as has happened plenty before with no such editing, and at that point it seems relevant to me.

Is there a rule against quoting edited posts in order to show meaning or motive? Once you hit "send", it's out in the wild. I've edited many posts, mostly for spelling, and sometimes to take out rudeness. And unlike some people, I'm willing to own that.

There's a difference between accidentally including an original post and purposefully including it (likely from a notification email) when the post has long been edited.

(July 12, 2017 at 11:41 pm)Lutrinae Wrote: I haven't seen Tibs on here in sooooo long, but suddenly he appears?

I'm a professional lurker.

Oh, you give yourself too much credit. I'm hardly bothered by people like you. I've sadly been around them my whole life.

Honestly, if you can't put it together, I won't spell it out for you. Just lay in a gutter for awhile and wonder if I'd give a shit if you ever crawled out of it. I'm sure it'll feel just like home.

You've got me. I've got full post-editing powers. I secretly run the forum from behind a curtain in Emerald City. Do you honestly think I wouldn't change your profile picture to a wrinkly old ball sack if I had admin privileges? If I had any power, you'd know it because I'm a troll and I'm never wrong. Did I miss anything?

(July 12, 2017 at 11:49 pm)Tiberius Wrote: There's a difference between accidentally including an original post and purposefully including it (likely from a notification email) when the post has long been edited.

"Long edited", eh? How long was it? And what does it reflect?

The last time I reported anything, it was a thread that needed to be split months ago. Lost my handles the report and we chatted. I do it so infrequently that I can remember every instance. You guys are mad at things that aren't real. Also, Tibs posts all the fucking time. At least, he's in here all the time. I have to rescue him from walking into things while he reads the forum constantly.

---

(July 12, 2017 at 11:52 pm)Lutrinae Wrote:

It's less funny when you get involved and then grab popcorn. Hardly a spectator, eh?

(July 12, 2017 at 11:34 pm)Shell B Wrote: Thena, I made two claims. One, that there are plenty of antihistamines and two that there are several inject-able options. Neither of those claims is untrue. I will not say I'm "wrong" just to please you. Now, if someone were to read all of the straw men and rearranged goalposts in this thread and not my posts, you might see something like what you've mentioned. If you read my actual comments, it's hard to imagine what got you so crabby to begin with. You got pissy out of nowhere and the resident white knights rode in to save you from the mean, old Shell B. Bully for you.

And horses have four legs, Shell. But, that has not a thing do with the specifics of the topic that was being discussed, and neither did your claims. 
You KNOW this, yet you persist.

Lol...And, speaking of white knight's riding in to the rescue....Didn't hubby come to your rescue only a page or two back when you were getting demolished by brewer, AND also edit my post in order to snip content that you posted right and proper? 

Get real, babe. I'm hardly the one who needs saving here.