(October 16, 2017 at 10:51 pm)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 16, 2017 at 10:48 pm)Joods Wrote: Exactly. This is a Pot meet kettle situation, or a do as I say not as I do issue. He wants to bitch that atheists don't go to religious sites, but wants a free pass when it comes time for him to do the same. I think his pussy hurts too much.

Its not like if I presented the Christian Websites, you would be sincere at all. You would just immediately reject it, right? So theres no point in presenting it.

Just like I said... you expect to hold us to a higher standard than what you're willing to hold yourself to. Typical.

(October 15, 2017 at 12:58 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:

(October 15, 2017 at 12:54 pm)Godisgood Wrote: I dont want to read a link. I want you to tell me here.

Ok then, London Underground Mosquito, differentiations in Peppered Moths, development of antibiotics resistance in viruses, genetics (genetic mutation, markers such as mitochondrial DNA &c), the complete absence of any logical plan to any animal or plant physiology (for example the fact that humans breathe and eat through the same tube) and finally the fossil record.

I dont understand what this means??

---

(October 16, 2017 at 10:52 pm)Joods Wrote:

(October 16, 2017 at 10:51 pm)Godisgood Wrote: Its not like if I presented the Christian Websites, you would be sincere at all. You would just immediately reject it, right? So theres no point in presenting it.

Just like I said... you expect to hold us to a higher standard than what you're willing to hold yourself to. Typical.

I dont know what that means??

Quote:Because theres no reason for you to not present the evidence to me? Its not homework. Its called presenting the evidence. Unless of course you have no evidence to present. Maybe thats it. Maybe you can't just present it. 

I want you to present the evidence. I dont want the evidence off of some random website.

And their is no reason you can't read the website. . And yes it is homework . It's called looking at the evidence .Unless you prove our point and  are too lazy or are afraid because you  know your beliefs are false. Maybe it is .and maybe if you want evidence you should look it up like you demand we do. 

You want evidence it's been presented like it or leave it.

---

Quote:Its not like if I presented the Christian Websites, you would be sincere at all. You would just immediately reject it, right? So theres no point in presenting it.

Kind of like how your just rejected the biology site . Is that proof of your insincerity ? None the less you keep referring to them .

Oh and that's ironically enough "JUST AN OPINION "

(October 16, 2017 at 10:35 pm)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 16, 2017 at 10:25 pm)Cyberman Wrote: ^^^^ Wow, he got one right!

I'm glad you agree.

How to piss off Godisgood in ten seconds: 

That and the fact that most non fundamentalist  Christians reject his bullshit.

Hell even apologist con man Billy Criag thinks it's bullshit 

Quote:(1:21) Craig: Now when you think about that, Kevin, that is just hugely embarrassing.  That over half of our ministers really believe that the universe is really 10,000 years old. This is just scientifically, it’s nonsense, and yet this is the view that the majority of our pastors hold. It’s really quite shocking when you think about it.

(October 16, 2017 at 11:00 pm)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 15, 2017 at 12:58 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote: Ok then, London Underground Mosquito, differentiations in Peppered Moths, development of antibiotics resistance in viruses, genetics (genetic mutation, markers such as mitochondrial DNA &c), the complete absence of any logical plan to any animal or plant physiology (for example the fact that humans breathe and eat through the same tube) and finally the fossil record.

I dont understand what this means??

---

(October 16, 2017 at 10:52 pm)Joods Wrote: Just like I said... you expect to hold us to a higher standard than what you're willing to hold yourself to. Typical.

I dont know what that means??

Of course you don't. When it's convenient, you play stupid. 


Only you really aren't playing.

---

(October 16, 2017 at 10:48 pm)Joods Wrote:

---

(October 16, 2017 at 10:45 pm)Godisgood Wrote: Because theres no reason for you to not present the evidence to me? Its not homework. Its called presenting the evidence. Unless of course you have no evidence to present. Maybe thats it. Maybe you can't just present it.

I want you to present the evidence. I dont want the evidence off of some random website.

Yet you expect us to just take your word for it that creationism is a real thing. How about your god? Why don't you present evidence right here and right now that he exists. 

I'll wait. 

Oh... and fyi: The bible doesn't count  as evidence.

Still waiting.

(October 16, 2017 at 9:50 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:

(October 16, 2017 at 9:44 pm)Godisgood Wrote: Yeah except I gave a valid excuse. I'd rather here you present the evidence. Why is that so difficult? Are you unable to do that?

Can you tell me what the difference is between reading evidence in this window vs. reading the very same text in another browser window?

Here lies the problem: it is against our rules to quote massive walls of text from a website. Also, charts and graphs don't copy/paste.

So, let's pick a topic. I'll choose the evolution of horses. There is tons of evidence in the form of fossil records and DNA, and it is all outlined here:
http://talkorigins.org/faqs/horses/horse_evol.html

Still Waiting.

You'll die waiting SC because Gig doesn't think that he should have to go to a website to read anything. But he thinks we should have to go to christian websites to read all about their brand of bullshit. Imagine that!

(October 16, 2017 at 11:24 pm)Joods Wrote: How to piss off Godisgood in ten seconds: 

Thank you! I appreciate you presenting me with Bill Nye's opinion!

---

(October 17, 2017 at 12:18 am)Godisgood Wrote:

(October 16, 2017 at 11:24 pm)Joods Wrote: How to piss off Godisgood in ten seconds: 

 

Thank you! I appreciate you presenting me with Bill Nye's opinion!