(January 4, 2018 at 10:21 pm)Khemikal Wrote: -and how any roads must a man, walk down, before you can call him a man?

(January 4, 2018 at 4:55 pm)SaStrike Wrote: Philosophy isn't horseshit though. It's just the simple is most of the time not as simple as it seems.

I agree. But not being an asshole and not sexually assaulting someone is pretty fucking simple. I don't really think philosophy is relevant here lol.

(January 4, 2018 at 1:22 pm)Mermaid Wrote:

(January 4, 2018 at 12:58 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Fair enough,  but I'd still wager it wouldn't have the same reaction.  There is no way people would be okay with it, nor praise him. And that's fine.

---

I don't know. There are women who can get off when someone stimulates their nipples enough.  Breasts are part of sex.

No doubt. There are some women who get off from having their neck bitten, too. Or their feet or the backs of their knees.

Puffy. Almost every girl I've dated likes having her tits played with. It makes no sense to say that it's a cultural thing because a tiny handful of tribesmen in the Amazon walk around topless compared to the rest of 7 billion people.

They are obviously an exception to the rule. Also who is to say they aren't still turmed on by nice Boobs? Probably the reason they aren't groping (if it's even true) is that they lve in a small tribe and you get the shit beaten out of you. That's if it's even true, they could be filled with gropers for all we know. I mean most of their cultures are way out there from isolation and I don't understand using them as proof of anything really.

I'm in favor of women being able to be topless or naked or whatever because I'm not a child and can look at sexual things without needing to grope.

I'm Canada you can be topless whenever you want and a. There aren't topless women all over

If there are, people can jst handle their shit. It's too bad that this happened to this girl, but im I'm not really shocked, festivals have a fair number of scumbags at them.

(January 3, 2018 at 12:00 pm)Mermaid Wrote: Why are breasts a sexual organ to he hidden? I think the question should start there.

I've wondered the same. Are breasts intrinsically sexually arousing to men, or is it purely societal? Are men born to think boobs are sexual, or does he get conditioned to feel that way by society?

I mean, boobs exist for the sole purpose of feeding babies. That is the whole reason they exist, and that seems like the least sexy thing ever.

---

.
On the other hand, I have heard that boobs are subconsciously a signal of fertility to men, which is why men are attracted to them (they are actually attracted to fertility without realizing it). So maybe men really are intrinsically attracted to boobs?

(January 5, 2018 at 12:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(January 3, 2018 at 12:00 pm)Mermaid Wrote: Why are breasts a sexual organ to he hidden? I think the question should start there.

I've wondered the same. Are breasts intrinsically sexually arousing to men, or is it purely societal? Are men born to think boobs are sexual, or does he get conditioned to feel that way by society?

I mean, boobs exist for the sole purpose of feeding babies. That is the whole reason they exist, and that seems like the least sexy thing ever.

I'd say they are intrincially sexual, not because of the way men react to seeing them, but womens nipples get hard because of sex and there is a physiological reaction to breast stimulation for the majority of women.

That a few Amazon natives walk around topless really doesn't prove anything.

(January 5, 2018 at 12:17 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:

(January 3, 2018 at 12:00 pm)Mermaid Wrote: Why are breasts a sexual organ to he hidden? I think the question should start there.

I've wondered the same. Are breasts intrinsically sexually arousing to men, or is it purely societal? Are men born to think boobs are sexual, or does he get conditioned to feel that way by society?

I mean, boobs exist for the sole purpose of feeding babies. That is the whole reason they exist, and that seems like the least sexy thing ever.

---

.
On the other hand, I have heard that boobs are subconsciously a signal of fertility to men, which is why men are attracted to them (they are actually attracted to fertility without realizing it). So maybe men really are intrinsically attracted to boobs?

I think it interesting that no other primate has a permanently 'developed' breast. All will enlarge when lactating, but only humans have enlarged breasts the rest of the time.

That suggests they are *also* there for another reason. And the most obvious reason is as a fertility or sexual display. And that would suggest that for human males, some degree of attraction is just part of being a human male.

Now, the most obvious reason doesn't have to be correct, but the evidence does seem to point this direction.

Yeah I'm gonna chalk it up to boobs being a subconscious signal of fertility to men, and that is why men are intrinsically attracted to them.

---

.
Oh, and that brings up the same question except about butts. I mean, they are used for pooping out of, and have 0 sexual or fertility function. Why do men like butts?

(January 5, 2018 at 12:30 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yeah I'm gonna chalk it up to boobs being a subconscious signal of fertility to men, and that is why men are intrinsically attracted to them.

---

.
Oh, and that brings up the same question except about butts. I mean, they are used for pooping out of, and have 0 sexual or fertility function. Why do men like butts?

Yes, and the same ideas seem to be the case here. Other primates do not have butts like humans do. it seems to be special for our species.

Nipples are an erogenous zone. It's the same for men.

Boobs are Christian butt is Muslim