(January 29, 2018 at 3:23 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(January 28, 2018 at 11:52 am)CapnAwesome Wrote: You can't prove either of those thoughts, unless you are a mind reader.

Considering republicans encompass millions and millions of people,  I'd assume they have a variety of motives.

I don’t give a trump’s ass for what the variety of motives happen to be.  I care about the effect of the policies and agenda of the party they support, and how that agenda is passed by obfuscating the rationale and disguising the damage it does to its victims.

If they don’t wish to be tarred by the effect of the agenda of their party, they are free to not be members or supporters of that party.

Okay......not really defending your first point. But whatever. I don't get very into the angry screaming monologue.

Not really. Some of them post up all kinds of stupid antagonistic shite on atheist forums, ad infinitum, ad nauseum.

Conservatives are less human.

(January 26, 2018 at 9:28 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: You're sorta repulsive, alpha.

“Sorta”

---

(January 26, 2018 at 9:57 am)alpha male Wrote:

(January 26, 2018 at 9:36 am)possibletarian Wrote: That is evolution, it's not an intelligent thing, it supports those who are physically the strongest and more able to impose their will.   Amazing that your god (supposedly an intelligence) would endorse it or make it that way though, seems he too is at the mercy of survival of the fittest.

No, it makes perfect sense. His will was that we be fruitful and fill the earth. We're disobedient, so a strong sex drive and sexual dimorphism were necessary to accomplish that goal.

Quote:The point is now it is being challenged and we can look forward I hope to a better future for both our young men and women.  It wont be easy though, truth never is.

What truth? The truth is that, from either a religious or atheist view, women were made so that they could be dominated by men. Attempts to bypass that truth result in negative population growth and the eventual demise of the species.

No, women are “made” to have babies. Women have sexual urges too, so men don’t have to dominate them. Without domination, the species would be fine. Such a fundamental misunderstanding of a woman’s role in sex.

(January 30, 2018 at 11:35 am)Shell B Wrote: No, women are “made” to have babies. Women have sexual urges too, so men don’t have to dominate them. Without domination, the species would be fine. Such a fundamental misunderstanding of a woman’s role in sex.

OK, what's the advantage in women being on average smaller and weaker than men?

(January 30, 2018 at 11:59 am)alpha male Wrote:

(January 30, 2018 at 11:35 am)Shell B Wrote: No, women are “made” to have babies. Women have sexual urges too, so men don’t have to dominate them. Without domination, the species would be fine. Such a fundamental misunderstanding of a woman’s role in sex.

OK, what's the advantage in women being on average smaller and weaker than men?

Estrogen and testosterone are the sex hormones, yes? Estrogen may not give us the girth of males, but it lets us have babies. Men have testosterone so they are big and can hunt/provide. Women have estrogen so that they are able to develop life inside of them.

Are you trying to make a criticism of evolution with this women are weak so men can dominate them thing or is that something you believe?

(January 30, 2018 at 12:05 pm)Shell B Wrote: Estrogen and testosterone are the sex hormones, yes? Estrogen may not give us the girth of males, but it lets us have babies. Men have testosterone so they are big and can hunt/provide. Women have estrogen so that they are able to develop life inside of them.

Are you trying to make a criticism of evolution with this women are weak so men can dominate them thing or is that something you believe?

I'm making an obvious application of natural selection, one that evolutionists are generally afraid to make for some reason.

However, you're not making an accurate application of natural selection. There are many other obvious evolutionary advantages to man's size other than an ability to dominate women, not the least of which is physical competition amongst each other for a mate, yet that's the one you glomb on to in an attempt to discredit evolutionary theory. Please avail yourself of a book or two on the subject.

Yes, I can see why "evolutionists" would be afraid to make uneducated, likely inaccurate guesses about the advantages of certain evolutionary traits.

I've yet to meet the man who could dominate me. Bring them on, bitches. Bring them the fuck on, because I will fuck them up.

(January 30, 2018 at 12:35 pm)Divinity Wrote: I've yet to meet the man who could dominate me.  Bring them on, bitches.  Bring them the fuck on, because I will fuck them up.

*Considers raising hand but is too scared*