(March 8, 2018 at 6:29 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(March 8, 2018 at 6:24 am)Huggy74 Wrote: The photo has to be scientifically vetted by an expert in the field of photography.

That's quite a low standard.

If the standard is so low then he should have no problem producing the evidence.

Pictures of God. Fuck me. Huggy must be a Poe, I really thought he was an actual guy. I've never heard this one before, even from the most extreme fundies.

Audio recordings of God?

....what the actual.

(March 8, 2018 at 6:51 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 8, 2018 at 6:29 am)Mathilda Wrote: That's quite a low standard.

If the standard is so low then he should have no problem producing the evidence.

Huggy, if your picture is irrefutable evidence God, then show it to us.  Why are you hesitant?  Shouldn’t this evidence you have close the case once and for all?

Photo of God's Eye in space! Some Christians try to use it as inspiration and preach that Yahweh has his eye on us. If it was Yahweh's eye there would be two! It is the eye of Odin:



Isn't He an awesome God!

(March 8, 2018 at 7:05 am)chimp3 Wrote: Photo of God's Eye in space! Some Christians try to use it as inspiration and preach that Yahweh has his eye on us.  If it was Yahweh's eye there would be two! It is the eye of Odin:



Isn't He an awesome God!

OMG, it IS Odin, my God, Lord, and Savior!!!

(March 8, 2018 at 6:51 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(March 8, 2018 at 6:29 am)Mathilda Wrote: That's quite a low standard.

If the standard is so low then he should have no problem producing the evidence.

It also suggests that your standards are quite low about what constitutes proof.

Scientifically vetted because one expert believes it to be so?

(March 8, 2018 at 1:15 am)Astreja Wrote:

(March 7, 2018 at 8:25 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: How about a photograph thoroughly vetted scientifically, along with eye witness testimony, and audio recordings of the same event?

That would be 3 pieces of corroborative evidence.

Can anyone provide the same for Odin? If not then it isn't exactly "potato, potaho" is it?

Can we interrogate the eye witnesses directly?

Do you have a photograph of your god (and preferably a negative, to ensure it hasn't been retouched)?

And what audio recordings are these?  I'm reasonably sure there were no analog or digital audio recorders in Biblical times.

I don't give a rat's ass about the testimony, photos or audio recordings of believers.  That's at least third-hand evidence due to the passage of time, and in any event people believe a lot of weird things for not particularly good reasons..

Let's not forget that Huggy was the one who made the claim that he could provide evidence blah blah blah ad nauseum.

(March 8, 2018 at 7:10 am)Mathilda Wrote:

(March 8, 2018 at 6:51 am)Huggy74 Wrote: If the standard is so low then he should have no problem producing the evidence.

It also suggests that your standards are quite low about what constitutes proof.

Scientifically vetted because one expert believes it to be so?

What does "scientifically vetted" even mean in this case?

I imagine that, at best, it means someone has said it hasn't been doctored. Big deal.

(March 8, 2018 at 6:55 am)robvalue Wrote: Pictures of God. Fuck me. Huggy must be a Poe, I really thought he was an actual guy. I've never heard this one before, even from the most extreme fundies.

Audio recordings of God?

....what the actual.

It's like you guys only hear what you want to hear.

Where did I say the audio is of God? I said I had corroborating evidence which consists of a photo, witness testimony, and an audio recording.

Let me explain how corroborating evidence works since apparently the concept is new to your simpleton mind.

The photograph is of an unexplained light hanging in mid air over the head of a person, this phenomena has also occurred in the Bible. The photograph has been examined and tested by the president of The American Society of Questioned Document Examiners George J. Lacy who formerly worked forensics for the FBI. In his official report he stated unequivocally that a light had to be there to form an image on the negative. Off the record he referred to the light as supernatural.

In the audio there is mention of the light moving around and hovering over different people. THIS CORROBORATES THE PICTURE.

There is also video of eye witness testimony who say they saw the light personally. THIS CORROBORATES THE PICTURE AND AUDIO.

Now it's up to you to debunk all THREE , not just one like you guys usually attempt to do.

Oh and btw Rob you stated you could produce the same evidence for Odin, so hop to it.

---

(March 8, 2018 at 7:04 am)LadyForCamus Wrote:

(March 8, 2018 at 6:51 am)Huggy74 Wrote: If the standard is so low then he should have no problem producing the evidence.

Huggy, if your picture is irrefutable evidence God, then show it to us.  Why are you hesitant?  Shouldn’t this evidence you have close the case once and for all?

Next time I post It I'm making a new thread where I'm putting all the evidence.