(March 25, 2018 at 8:54 pm)Godscreated Wrote:

(March 25, 2018 at 2:33 am)Grandizer Wrote: Except you really are making stuff up. I can't help that you desperately need to be right, no matter what. This is a pride issue that you're struggling with, but unfortunately for you, you really are misinterpreting the passage.

An atheist telling a Christian he's misinterpreting scripture, now that's a laugh. No pride to it, it's the truth and you are blind to God's truth. So no, I'm not making things up the verses read plain and simple.

GC

An atheist who's read the Bible more than once, mind you. Nowhere in the Bible does it say what you're saying, so you are making things up. So not only is pride something you struggle with, you are also being dishonest.

Quote: An atheist telling a Christian he's misinterpreting scripture, now that's a laugh.

Now, there I agree with you.  That is unfair.  You are not misrepresenting scripture.

What you are is a jackass for thinking any of it is factual.  Big difference.

(March 30, 2018 at 1:29 am)Grandizer Wrote:

(March 25, 2018 at 8:54 pm)Godscreated Wrote: An atheist telling a Christian he's misinterpreting scripture, now that's a laugh. No pride to it, it's the truth and you are blind to God's truth. So no, I'm not making things up the verses read plain and simple.

GC

An atheist who's read the Bible more than once, mind you. Nowhere in the Bible does it say what you're saying, so you are making things up. So not only is pride something you struggle with, you are also being dishonest.

You need to prove your accusations or drop them, you have are saying things which are not true and i believe it's because you are very insecure in your atheism.

GC

(March 30, 2018 at 1:49 am)Godscreated Wrote:

(March 30, 2018 at 1:29 am)Grandizer Wrote: An atheist who's read the Bible more than once, mind you. Nowhere in the Bible does it say what you're saying, so you are making things up. So not only is pride something you struggle with, you are also being dishonest.

You need to prove your accusations or drop them, you have are saying things which are not true and i believe it's because you are very insecure in your atheism.

GC

It is far easier for you to prove me wrong by pointing to those verses that support what you're saying. So show us the verses that say that Mary herself was asked by Luke. You won't because you can't, and you can't because those verses don't exist.

(March 30, 2018 at 1:56 am)Grandizer Wrote:

(March 30, 2018 at 1:49 am)Godscreated Wrote: You need to prove your accusations or drop them, you have are saying things which are not true and i believe it's because you are very insecure in your atheism.

GC

It is far easier for you to prove me wrong by pointing to those verses that support what you're saying. So show us the verses that say that Mary herself was asked by Luke. You won't because you can't, and you can't because those verses don't exist.

You're right I can't ask her and neither can you so you have no proof or even reason to believe Luke didn't ask her. She is the one who would know about those times so it's obvious that Luke would get the real story from her. Luke was well educated and would want to know the truth from the source.

GC

(March 30, 2018 at 2:38 am)Godscreated Wrote:

(March 30, 2018 at 1:56 am)Grandizer Wrote: It is far easier for you to prove me wrong by pointing to those verses that support what you're saying. So show us the verses that say that Mary herself was asked by Luke. You won't because you can't, and you can't because those verses don't exist.

You're right I can't ask her and neither can you so you have no proof or even reason to believe Luke didn't ask her. She is the one who would know about those times so it's obvious that Luke would get the real story from her. Luke was well educated and would want to know the truth from the source.

GC

And the verses don't say that Luke interacted with Mary in any way, so quit the dishonesty and just say that you think Luke asked Mary about Jesus' early years but you're just not sure. Just admit you were wrong for being confident about it earlier.

Presumably they are still working out the explanation for this little jewel from Scripture:

Deuteronomy 25 (KJV)
19 Therefore it shall be, when the Lord thy God hath given thee rest from all thine enemies round about, in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, that thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget it.

(March 30, 2018 at 2:38 am)Godscreated Wrote:

(March 30, 2018 at 1:56 am)Grandizer Wrote: It is far easier for you to prove me wrong by pointing to those verses that support what you're saying. So show us the verses that say that Mary herself was asked by Luke. You won't because you can't, and you can't because those verses don't exist.

You're right I can't ask her and neither can you so you have no proof or even reason to believe Luke didn't ask her. She is the one who would know about those times so it's obvious that Luke would get the real story from her. Luke was well educated and would want to know the truth from the source.

GC

Another fictional person that you think existed, huh G-C.  Pathetic.

(March 30, 2018 at 3:01 am)Grandizer Wrote:

(March 30, 2018 at 2:38 am)Godscreated Wrote: You're right I can't ask her and neither can you so you have no proof or even reason to believe Luke didn't ask her. She is the one who would know about those times so it's obvious that Luke would get the real story from her. Luke was well educated and would want to know the truth from the source.

GC

And the verses don't say that Luke interacted with Mary in any way, so quit the dishonesty and just say that you think Luke asked Mary about Jesus' early years but you're just not sure. Just admit you were wrong for being confident about it earlier.

You are a wuss, you can't accept that someone is so confident in what he understands that you have to stand in the corner and cry your little eyes out. Luke must of talked to Mary to have the information of His early years.

GC

There was no "luke."  It is a name made up in the late 2d century and applied to your silly-assed gospel.  In fact, the earliest rendition of "luke" was Marcion's "Gospel of the Lord."  He never heard of fucking "luke" either.