(April 15, 2018 at 2:45 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: Remember when Trump was urging Obama to fix US first and let other countries take care of Syria?

I think the correct math is $150 million, so:

Trump launched 110 tomahawk missiles at Syria.

Each costs $1.40M to make. That's $154M total.

Estimated cost to replace Flint's water pipes? $55M.

But this missile attack was all so that Trump feels like his dick is big and that Christians get illusion how their god is the greatest of all gods.

Don't get me started on Flint water crisis.

EPA poobah Susan Hedman needs to be in prison. And that occurred during Obama era. Blame seemed to peter out the higher the scandal rose through the city, state, and federal agencies all charged with responsibilities to protect water supply.

Fucking outrageous.

(April 15, 2018 at 3:09 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(April 15, 2018 at 3:01 pm)henryp Wrote: What do you think Macron's motivations were?  Same as Trumps?  Same with Trudeau supporting strikes?

Do you view the rest of the world leaders as being Trump's lap dogs in regards to this strike?

Maybe they just let Trump do his thing thinking it may look like they tried something.

And what do you think Trump's motive is for not fixing the pipes? Not enough fireworks?

May look like they tried something?  Not sure what that means.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/04/us/flint-...index.html

The EPA (during Trump presidency) doled out 100 million towards the pipes in March 2017, and they say the water is drinkable again as of the beginning of April.  

(April 15, 2018 at 3:24 pm)henryp Wrote:

(April 15, 2018 at 3:09 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote: Maybe they just let Trump do his thing thinking it may look like they tried something.

And what do you think Trump's motive is for not fixing the pipes? Not enough fireworks?

May look like they tried something?  Not sure what that means.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/04/us/flint-...index.html

The EPA (during Trump presidency) doled out 100 million towards the pipes in March 2017, and they say the water is drinkable again as of the beginning of April.  

I don't know then why I stumble on "wrong" news like this one where they say how people in Michigan are protesting against ending of state's handing out bottled water and filters and want Snyder to resign
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/11/us/fl...index.html

(April 15, 2018 at 3:40 pm)Fake Messiah Wrote:

(April 15, 2018 at 3:24 pm)henryp Wrote: May look like they tried something?  Not sure what that means.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/03/04/us/flint-...index.html

The EPA (during Trump presidency) doled out 100 million towards the pipes in March 2017, and they say the water is drinkable again as of the beginning of April.  

I don't know then why I stumble on "wrong" news like this one where they say how people in Michigan are protesting against ending of state's handing out bottled water and filters and want Snyder to resign
https://edition.cnn.com/2018/04/11/us/fl...index.html

The governor claims that the water has been tested and it's fine.  CNN hasn't presented any information to indicate that isn't true.

If the water is fixed, the the bottled water program ending make sense.  Although, if I were a Flint resident, I'd certainly be skeptical as hell, and want Snyder to resign.  I also wouldn't be thrilled at the prospect of being first to drink from the formerly poison taps.  Definitely think protesting, and more importantly, getting all the people who fucked them out of office is the way to go.

None of this has anything to do with Trump, other than the EPA doling out the 100 million to fix the problem shortly after his inauguration.  Which was your initial complaint.  That Trump spent all that money bombing Syria, while not addressing Flint.  Which appears to just be a woopsie, in that you missed a bit of the timeline, which is understandable, given this story's been going on for 3 years.

He won Michigan, right?