(May 2, 2018 at 12:19 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: No.  No one implied you were wrong on this occasion.

Vulcan did - he said there's more to it than that. Waiting to hear what he has.

Quote:I implied you are full of yourself to cite yourself to justify yourself.

Cite myself? I quoted it because it didn't get an answer.

I was thinking this morning after my poo that a designer could not have been too intelligent to have created corn and then made the human body absolutely incapable of properly digesting it.

(May 2, 2018 at 12:30 pm)Kit Wrote: I was thinking this morning after my poo that a designer could not have been too intelligent to have created corn and then made the human body absolutely incapable of properly digesting it.

From the guy who yesterday was complaining that there isn't enough serious theist discussion going on...

Pick out the kernels and get a bomb calorimeter and test them.

You'll be surprised at how efficiently your GI tract absorbed the corn starches and sugars. The kernel casings are necessary fibre so that's a ++ too.

(May 2, 2018 at 12:32 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 12:30 pm)Kit Wrote: I was thinking this morning after my poo that a designer could not have been too intelligent to have created corn and then made the human body absolutely incapable of properly digesting it.

From the guy who yesterday was complaining that there isn't enough serious theist discussion going on...

Poo is a serious discussion. Ask CL.

(May 2, 2018 at 12:32 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 12:30 pm)Kit Wrote: I was thinking this morning after my poo that a designer could not have been too intelligent to have created corn and then made the human body absolutely incapable of properly digesting it.

From the guy who yesterday was complaining that there isn't enough serious theist discussion going on...

You don't get the symbolism, A/M.

(May 2, 2018 at 12:30 pm)alpha male Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 12:19 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: No.  No one implied you were wrong on this occasion.

Vulcan did - he said there's more to it than that. Waiting to hear what he has.

Quote:I implied you are full of yourself to cite yourself to justify yourself.

Cite myself?  I quoted it because it didn't get an answer.

And he would be right.  The definition you provide is true but by no means adequately complete.  It is a little akin to defining thinking as changes in action potential over the surface of nerve cells.

Always true, but hardly sufficient.  You described one part of the mechanism, by no means any other mechanism that must interacts with it to produce the process.

I suspect the omission is not unintentional as it serves to take emphasis away from the fact that other mechanisms interacting with the one you describe combines to make it clear Christianity has staked its claim to truth on manifestly false foundations.

OK - waiting for an adequately complete definition from an authoritative source.

(May 2, 2018 at 12:58 pm)alpha male Wrote: OK - waiting for an adequately complete definition from an authoritative source.

Look up evolution by natural selection.

(May 2, 2018 at 1:14 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:

(May 2, 2018 at 12:58 pm)alpha male Wrote: OK - waiting for an adequately complete definition from an authoritative source.

Look up evolution by natural selection.

He won't he will just keep demanding we spoon feed him one . Then he will play dumb again .