A talking parrot wouldn;t surprise me...but when the pigeon speaks....... 

One of the best things a liar can do when caught is continue to deny, deny, deny.

(May 21, 2018 at 10:36 am)Drich Wrote:

(May 19, 2018 at 12:21 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: Autoimmune disease is not Autoimmune Deficiency Syndrome.   Autoimmune response is a bad thing in any measure and a deficiency in that bad thing would generally not be not regarded as a worrisome syndrome.

He strung together grandiose sounding words whose meaning he clearly didn’t understand and couldn’t care less about to concoct his bullshit, and even then he can’t be bothered to open a dictionary or thesaurus to find words to actually produce the desired acronym.   His made up “syndrome” only abbreviates to ADS, Not AIDS.

Actually its AID not AIDS

And AID can share the same net symptoms as one with AIDS, just no viral trigger as in the case of AIDS it can be AIDS without HIV

https://www.news-medical.net/news/201209...-Asia.aspx

---

(May 21, 2018 at 9:37 am)Khemikal Wrote: -and now you're lying about the lies you told us about your lies.  

Somehow I doubt this is gonna go over well with the big guy.  

now your lying about lying with the lies you originally told.

If anything, just as I do now I speak to individuals. I give an individual an explanation based on what he or she and I are discussing, and ne of you"good people" who are always looking for rope to hang me with. pieced and parted a story together. Because I remember the liar chage comming out of nowhere/someone I wasn't even speaking with

I originally remember trying to describe AIDS being an Auto immune deficiency meaning one with AIDS is problem is triggered by HIV, but one can still have AID and not have HIV which the article above vindicates.

You 'good people' chopped up what I said because you all are too lazy to look stuff up or even click on my links before you speak. one of you took off with popular belief about aids and found an inconsistency with what I told you AID's was about and like I said found a lenth of rope, labled me a liar and now hang me from it every chance you get.

I freely admit that I did indeed fail an HIV test but because they were so unreliable back then they automatically make you take another. and a few days before my results came back the leasions I did not have frozen off went away on their own after me and God work things out. then the test came back negitive.

That is the whole story. I never said I had full blown AIDS This was my AIDS scare story. I had a skin virus (by the hundreds of lesions ion my neck torso and arms) that only late stage AIDS people get. tested positive for HIV the leason went away after I made piece with God, and then it all came back negative. This is why I refer to this as my AIDS Scare... Now I may have said I had an immune defence/white cell cont so low that was infected with the late stage skin virius.

Later on having more trouble with my immune system (now the opposite/now over producing white cells with some sort of protein that indicates cancer started another 'scare' that took over a year to resolve. from which I found My appendix burst so time ago. can prove all of that as this was a year or so ago and I still get tests every year. This is what I call my cancer scare. What I believe was tested for over a year and never once did I blame God or falter in what I believed.

---

(May 18, 2018 at 7:07 pm)Mathilda Wrote:

---

(May 18, 2018 at 5:13 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) is specifically linked to HIV. All cases are linked to HIV. Anytime AIDS is used and not linked to HIV the authors (and you) are perpetrating a falsehood. They use the Non-HIV/AIDS term as a hook for the feeble minded. 

You need to stop lying.

AID what does AID stand for you self righteous "good person?"

Asshole is drich?

By god I do think you gave yourself a very proper diagnosis. Didn’t know you had it in you.

Has this idiot seriously tried to compare Racism to the self correcting mechanism of science . When self correction is the means by which one comes closer to being right . As i said . Science is a ever growing tree . Religion is a decaying house . And no there is no faith in science .

As for GC ignorance of astrophysics they find Exoplanets by studying the effects that planets have on stars . Radial Velocity ,Transit Photometry ,Micro lensing , Looking at gravity topography (how science found neptune with directly observing it) 

As for trying to draw a line between so called theoretical and practical science. No such distinction exists it's all science and all follows the methods of science . And without both we would be fucked .

The "self correcting mechanism" of Christianity is called "schism".

It has worked properly tens of thousands of times.

(May 22, 2018 at 3:35 am)Tizheruk Wrote: As for GC ignorance of astrophysics they find Exoplanets by studying the effects that planets have on stars . Radial Velocity ,Transit Photometry ,Micro lensing , Looking at gravity topography (how science found neptune with directly observing it) 

What GC and other theists of his ilk do not realise is that in science the evidence comes first and hypotheses are derived from it, then tested with more observations and evidence that eventually forms a theory if correct.

So he is completely incorrect when he says:

(May 17, 2018 at 12:46 am)Godscreated Wrote: I disagree, scientist are drawing conclusions about planets they have never seen

Scientists are creating hypotheses about bodies that have been measured (e.g. the intensity of light dips as the body passes in front of the star). They do this based on what they know about things that can unequivocally be measured, such as the atmosphere of the planet as the light changes as it passes across the star and comparing it to what we know about our own planet. From this they can draw hypotheses about what has produced the atmosphere. For example if it suggests an oxygen rich atmosphere, it is indicative of life. But if not, at the very least it has water.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterre...atmosphere

Quote:There is evidence that extrasolar planets can have an atmosphere. Comparisons of these atmospheres to one another and to Earth's atmosphere broaden our basic understanding of atmospheric processes such as the greenhouse effect, aerosol and cloud physics, and atmospheric chemistry and dynamics.

Whereas the religious mindset is the reverse. Instead of starting with observations and evidence and building hypotheses and then theories from it, they start off with a claim and selectively look for evidence to support that claim.

Remember, god made uranus.

(May 22, 2018 at 3:35 am)Tizheruk Wrote: Has this idiot seriously tried to compare Racism to the self correcting mechanism of science . When self correction is the means by which one comes closer to being right . As i said . Science is a ever growing tree . Religion is a decaying house . And no there is no faith in science .

As for GC ignorance of astrophysics they find Exoplanets by studying the effects that planets have on stars . Radial Velocity ,Transit Photometry ,Micro lensing , Looking at gravity topography (how science found neptune with directly observing it) 

As for trying to draw a line between so called theoretical and practical science. No such distinction exists it's all science and all follows the methods of science . And without both we would be fucked .

What?

You "good people" are so MF-ing stupid sometimes I think that is why my white cell count is so high... My immune system is trying to protect me from your stupidity as if it were a contagious virus.

For you and everyone else who needs me to unbox simple analogies like this one. I did not compare Racism to science. I compared being wrong with being wrong and self correcting with yet another wrong answer... How the F did you miss that I even explained it!!! In that 'self correction' does not intrinsically have anything to do with truth. You can self correct 1000 time and be wrong each and every time. My point to that is it take a huge amount of faith to believe a system who is always self correcting. How do you ever know when what they system says is ever "Truth?" It take massive Faith to believe a given fact is truth especially when in this system that every fact before this one was indeed wrong by the very definition of self correction. Are you people so blind you can not see this or do you pretend it does not matter and hide your faith behind personal attack and insults? IE: "Did drich compare science to bigotry?" F-ing idiot.. Shame on you if you knew better and slimed my words up to fit your propaganda, Shame on you more if you really are this stupid, and that is what you really believe!!!

I guess being stupid for the cause of science is better then standing on your own intelligence and being factually correct... Wow what a system of belief, where it is better to be made a fool of and be wrong for the name sake of science, rather than challenge the process and be right.

Science an ever growing body of work


Religion a decaying husk desperately being held together by apologist scammers

---

And sciences self correcting mechanism works . Your moronic comparison to racism does not . Not all self corrections are equal dumbass .

And Science is built on evidence not faith . That what religion is solely built on .

(May 22, 2018 at 8:53 am)vorlon13 Wrote: The "self correcting mechanism" of Christianity is called "schism".

It has worked properly tens of thousands of times.

That’s like saying shitting and squirting in your bed is the self correction mechanism for the skunk that invaded your house.