(June 22, 2018 at 1:19 pm)Alexmahone Wrote:

(June 22, 2018 at 12:54 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Shut the fuck up.

It's a biology question for god's sake! My point was just that other races seem to have evolved/changed more than blacks relative to our common ancestors.

And I said shut the fuck up. Obvious racist is obvious.

(June 22, 2018 at 1:19 pm)Alexmahone Wrote:

(June 22, 2018 at 12:54 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Shut the fuck up.

It's a biology question for god's sake! My point was just that other races seem to have evolved/changed more than blacks relative to our common ancestors.

It's not really a biology question though, because "more evolved" is simply a nonsensical concept and is nonexistent in biology.  The only times I've seen the idea of "more/less evolved" brought up is when people try to stage one population/race/ethnicity as being superior/inferior to another.

(June 22, 2018 at 1:16 pm)Clueless Morgan Wrote:

(June 22, 2018 at 5:53 am)paulpablo Wrote: If evolution is taken to mean gradual change in heritable characteristics then it's possible that black people have evolved/changed less simply because of a change not being necessary.  Since they're in the same climate as earlier humans.

Except that there's more genetic diversity among dark-skinned Africans than there is among lighter-skinned people.  So while it's true to say that we differ in skin color, it could also be argued, per the logic of the OP, that dark-skinned Africans are more evolved because they have more genetic diversity overall.

But genetic diversity doesn't mean more change it just means more numerous different types of change.  They're all different to one another but haven't necessarily changed more than non Africans have relative to an original ancestor.

If you were to look at dogs and wanted to find out which one changed the most since evolving from wolves you'd measure that based on which is the most different from the wolf rather than which comes from a more genetically diverse breed. 

Hypothetically if you have 100 different types of Husky dogs but only one type of pug dog it doesn't mean that the pug dog has changed less because the Husky dogs are more genetically diverse.

At least that's how I understand it.

(June 22, 2018 at 1:19 pm)Alexmahone Wrote:

(June 22, 2018 at 12:54 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: Shut the fuck up.

It's a biology question for god's sake! My point was just that other races seem to have evolved/changed more than blacks relative to our common ancestors.

We all seem to have evolved pretty far from that.

https://www.livescience.com/60093-last-c...ealed.html



Well, for the most part.

(June 21, 2018 at 1:17 pm)Alexmahone Wrote: The original humans, who evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago, were most likely black. Does this mean that other races are more evolved than Blacks?

Ok I'll bite.

I don't expect to have any serious debate sine you ducked out of your last racist thread.


Define more evolved.

Are we speaking physically? Then why in the U.S. are we overly represented in sports?

Are we speaking genetically?

54 year old black woman


VS 51 year old white woman


Then there's the whole white people injecting themselves with melanin thing...

The lack of melanin is a genetic deficiency, ask any albino.

as far as common ancestors go.

Oh yeah, and a shave chimp is white.


So again, what do you mean by "more evolved"?

He thinks he is better than you.


Pompous ass.


( Him.  Not you.)

(June 24, 2018 at 1:30 am)Huggy74 Wrote:

(June 21, 2018 at 1:17 pm)Alexmahone Wrote: The original humans, who evolved in Africa around 200,000 years ago, were most likely black. Does this mean that other races are more evolved than Blacks?

Ok I'll bite.

I don't expect to have any serious debate sine you ducked out of your last racist thread.


Define more evolved.

Are we speaking physically? Then why in the U.S. are we overly represented in sports?

Are we speaking genetically?

54 year old black woman

---

---

VS 51 year old white woman

---

---

Then there's the whole white people injecting themselves with melanin thing...

The lack of melanin is a genetic deficiency, ask any albino.

as far as common ancestors go.

---

---

Oh yeah, and a shave chimp is white.

---

---

So again, what do you mean by "more evolved"?

Being white isn't a genetic deficiency. And the rest of what you did isn't science it's just posting pictures of lips, apes and random women.

(June 22, 2018 at 1:35 pm)Minimalist Wrote:

(June 22, 2018 at 1:19 pm)Alexmahone Wrote: It's a biology question for god's sake! My point was just that other races seem to have evolved/changed more than blacks relative to our common ancestors.

We all seem to have evolved pretty far from that.

https://www.livescience.com/60093-last-c...ealed.html



Well, for the most part.

LMAO.

(June 24, 2018 at 3:15 am)paulpablo Wrote:

(June 24, 2018 at 1:30 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Ok I'll bite.

I don't expect to have any serious debate sine you ducked out of your last racist thread.


Define more evolved.

Are we speaking physically? Then why in the U.S. are we overly represented in sports?

Are we speaking genetically?

54 year old black woman

---

---

VS 51 year old white woman

---

---

Then there's the whole white people injecting themselves with melanin thing...

The lack of melanin is a genetic deficiency, ask any albino.

as far as common ancestors go.

---

---

Oh yeah, and a shave chimp is white.

---

---

So again, what do you mean by "more evolved"?

Being white isn't a genetic deficiency. And the rest of what you did isn't science it's just posting pictures of lips, apes and random women.

Being white is absolutely a genetic deficiency for those living in regions of intense overhead sun shine.  They need frequent medical attention in the form of sun screens.  

Conversely being black is a genetic deficiency for those living in regions of short or weak sunshine.

Actually I've lived in Alaska 20 years without any detrimental effects. Not to mention the fact that Eskimos have dark skin.

Body fat is what's most important when it comes to cold weather.