(September 12, 2011 at 5:44 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I called you philosophically ignorant; you not knowing that when I appeal to scripture I am being very philosophically astute because it is my ultimate authority on matters of truth just helps to demonstrate that my claims about your philosophical ignorance were well supported.

Proverbs 16:18:

"Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall."

"A fool does not delight in understanding, But only in revealing his own mind." (Proverbs 18:2).

(September 12, 2011 at 5:49 pm)Shell B Wrote: Philosophical ignorance? This coming from you? I'm not being dishonest. I am being reasonable. You, on the other hand, are being a twat, as usual.

Well calling me grade school names does nothing to prove your assertion that you are being “reasonable” in the slightest.

Quote:That does not make that single disbelief a worldview.

Yes it does, see below.

Quote:

Quote:Solipsism is both a philosophy and a worldview and it is simply the disbelief in the existence of anything other than one’s own mind.

And?

I was just proving your assertion that worldviews cannot be based off of one disbelief wrong, don’t comprehend it or anything.

Quote:You know absolutely nothing of my "worldview." Therefore, you have no grounds to say that it cannot be defended. If you are speaking of my atheism, I'm sorry that you are so purposely ignorant that you think atheism makes up my entire worldview. As for my "complete ignorance of philosophical terms," shove it up your ass. I'm entirely sick of dealing with your flaming, Stat. You set yourself and your beliefs on a pedestal and refuse to even try to expand your own sickeningly stunted knowledge. If you really think the bible holds all the answers, you are hopelessly lost and nothing I can say will change the outcome of every debate we have. You will always end with, "The Bible tells me so, stupid atheist. Nahna." It's fucking pathetic.

Crying about it doesn't solve anything now does it?

(September 12, 2011 at 5:44 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Your ultimate authority should have been recycled for shit tickets a long time ago.

What ultimate authority are you using to judge my ultimate authority? Since you claim to be philosophically knowledgeable it should be an easy enough question to answer.

(September 12, 2011 at 5:44 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Well it’s a non-sequitur to assume just because a person is wrong about point A they are also wrong about point B. Be that as it may, Genesis is clear that man is distinguished from the animals because he was made in God’s image, this is meant as on a spiritual level, meaning man exists after death and was made with some of God’s likenesses. Some verses in the New Testament that also support the concept of a soul that exists after death are…

Matthew 17:1-8 and Luke 16:19-31

Man is spiritually distinct from the animals because he exists after death. Nice to meet you by the way.

I don't believe you have demonstrated with Matt and Luke that humans have 'souls' and animals don't. I'm getting off topic here and it's a subject that would warrant much scripture references. If you are interested to debate this topic, we could start a new thread in the Christianity forum ?

(September 12, 2011 at 6:03 pm)CoxRox Wrote: I don't believe you have demonstrated with Matt and Luke that humans have 'souls' and animals don't. I'm getting off topic here and it's a subject that would warrant much scripture references. If you are interested to debate this topic, we could start a new thread in the Christianity forum ?

I believe I have already demonstrated it with Matthew and Luke, so no thanks.

---

(September 12, 2011 at 5:55 pm)Darwinian Wrote: Proverbs 16:18:

"Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall."

Careful, if you appeal to scripture Shell will call you stupid.

(September 12, 2011 at 6:05 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:

(September 12, 2011 at 5:55 pm)Darwinian Wrote: Proverbs 16:18:

"Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall."

Careful, if you appeal to scripture Shell will call you stupid.

Not when it's apposite.

(September 12, 2011 at 6:01 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Well calling me grade school names does nothing to prove your assertion that you are being “reasonable” in the slightest.

Oh, no. It can be reasonably asserted that you are a twat. I have no doubt about it.

Quote:Yes it does, see below.

No, it doesn't. I saw below and you have yet to take every other belief and disbelief individuals have into account. If you think for a second that a person can live their whole life only believing or disbelieving one single thing, you are deluded. Wait . . .

Quote:I was just proving your assertion that worldviews cannot be based off of one disbelief wrong, don’t comprehend it or anything.

You didn't prove shit. "Based off" is very different from "is." Still, even "based off" doesn't apply to atheism.

Quote:[img] http://www.duramaxforum.com/forum/attach...crying.jpg [/img]

Lovely.

(September 12, 2011 at 5:44 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: What ultimate authority are you using to judge my ultimate authority?

None, dur. There is no ultimate authority. Your ultimate authority is yourself and you don't even realize it. Like every other deluded bible thumper, you cherry pick the bible and act according to your own whims, bending scripture to suit what you want out of life and what you are willing to do/not do, tell people to do/tell people not to do. Scary really, but you are your own god.

Quote:Since you claim to be philosophically knowledgeable it should be an easy enough question to answer.

I made that claim? You're doing that pretending Shell said something she didn't say thing again. It's a good thing most people here know I wouldn't call myself "philosophically knowledgeable" like some self absorbed twit.

(September 12, 2011 at 6:05 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: I believe I have already demonstrated it with Matthew and Luke, so no thanks.

I'm off to bed then, night night.....

Nighty, night

(September 12, 2011 at 6:08 pm)Darwinian Wrote: Not when it's apposite.

...and you determine that by?